8:29 am on Tuesday, May 14, 2013
The original headline and article were incorrect and have been edited. We apologize for the error.
9:28 am on Monday, May 13, 2013
To register, send an email to bhdadmin@bethel-ct.gov.
10:19 am on Thursday, April 11, 2013
Hey Folks,
Just want to remind you to please include "Brookfield, CT" with the address so the map updates automatically.
11:50 pm on Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Heard a question from a reader tonight about not being able to see the totals for some of the smaller departments when compared against the total budget.
In order to see just one department at a time, leave the search box (the second box) blank and just choose a department from the drop down menu (the first box) and click 'search.'
1:27 pm on Monday, April 8, 2013
Hey Lisa,
To answer part of your post, I have been told by members of Brookfield's Land Use Department that developers are in fact looking at these threads as they consider what they think will succeed. Obviously there's no mandate, but your opinions are being heard.
9:58 am on Friday, March 29, 2013
A statement from Stephen J. Sedensky III, State’s Attorney for the Judicial District of Danbury, clarifies what several readers have pointed out as factual inaccuracies contained in the court documents. Sedensky's statement reads, in part:
"The released search warrants were obtained on December 14, 15, 16, 2012, within a short time of the shootings. Subsequent investigation revealed that shootings took place in two of the classrooms, not three, and that the shooter was not wearing a bullet-proof vest, nor was he a teenager."
The full statement may be found at the following link: http://www.ct.gov/csao/cwp/view.asp?a=1801&Q=521714
The article has been corrected so that it now accurately reflects the facts as provided by authorities.
11:41 am on Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Hello Harriet,
You can find all 95 chapters and this epilogue listed here in reverse chronological order: http://brookfield.patch.com/search/blog_posts#/_utf8:%E2%98%83/type:blog_posts/contributor:537459/page:1/_utf8:%E2%98%83
Aaron Boyd
8:52 am on Tuesday, May 14, 2013
This is from the state statutes on Food Service Inspection:
"Every food service establishment shall maintain a rating score of eighty (80) or higher and shall not have one (1) or more four (4) demerit point items in violation, regardless of the rating score. The four (4) demerit point items include: Food from approved source, wholesome, nonadulterated; potentially hazardous food meets temperature requirements during storage, preparation, display, service, and transportation; unwrapped or potentially hazardous food not re-served; toxic material properly stored, labeled, used; personnel with infections restricted; adequate handwashing facilities, convenient, accessible, designed, installed, personnel hands washed, clean; water source, adequate, safe; sewage disposal approved and no nuisance; no cross-connection, back-siphonage, backflow; and adequate toilet facilities, convenient, accessible, designed, installed."