.

UPDATE: Key Evidence in the Drew Peterson Murder Trial Blocked by Judge

Area News: Judge Edward Burmilla rules that several allegations, including one in which Peterson allegedly tried to hire a hit man to kill his third wife, cannot be brought up in the trial.

Prosecutors lost out on some key evidence they want to use in their bid to convict Bolingbrook cop Drew Peterson on charges he murdered his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

Judge Edward Burmila ruled Tuesday—the trial's first day—that Peterson's attorneys won't have to defend him against allegations he offered a co-worker $25,000 to find a hit man to kill Savio, that he broke into the house Savio was living in by cutting a hole in a wall, or that he threw her to the ground and held her face down in the grass until the police arrived during a dispute in 2002.

Prosecutors failed to notify Peterson's defense team that they planned to use the hit man story as evidence. Braidwood man Jeffrey Pachter, who worked at a cable installation company with Peterson, was expected to testify that Peterson offered him $25,000 to find a hit man to kill Savio.

Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow nearly prompted Burmila to declare a mistrial when he brought up the hit man story during his opening arguments. Burmila decided against calling a mistrial despite arguments made by defense attorney Steve Greenberg that "You’ve got a jury in the box that heard the defendant offered money to somebody to kill his wife. What are you going to say—‘It was a big mistake?’ ”

Burmila also decided the jury should hear nothing about Peterson cutting a hole in a wall of Savio's home to gain entrance—which Peterson has admitted to doing, because he owned the home.

Peterson and Savio had lived together in the Bolingbrook house, but he moved out after she found out about his love affair with teenaged Stacy Peterson and their marriage broke down. Prosecutors contend Savio feared Peterson would kill her around the time her estranged husband happened to cut the hole in the wall, and pointed out that she was so scared that she had a neighbor install a deadbolt on her bedroom door.

Someone cut a hole in the bedroom door, as well, according to prosecutors, but Judge Burmila is not letting the jury know about that hole.

Greenberg was dismissive of the hole in the wall.

"Is that like, 'There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza dear Liza'? " he joked. "The hole has nothing to do with the case. You don't convict someone on dirt."

Prosecutors have also been deprived of telling the jury about the time Peterson hurled Savio down and held her there after she allegedly attacked Stacy, whose mysterious disappearance in October 2007 set the events in motion that led to Peterson's arrest on murder charges in May 2009.

Stacy remains missing. Peterson is the sole suspect in the Illinois State Police investigation of her disappearance. He has yet to be charged with harming her.

Savio was charged with battery, domestic battery, and visitation interference in connection with the May 2002 altercation. She was later found not guilty of all charges.

Burmila said it "doesn't matter if she was acquitted," and decided the jury shouldn't hear about it, even though defense attorney Joel Brodsky for some reason brought it up during his opening argument.

None of Peterson's friends or family attended the first day of his murder trial. Savio's father, Henry Savio, and stepmother, Marcia Savio, were in the gallery. So was Pam Bosco, the foster mother of Stacy's sister, Cassandra Cales.

After the hearing, Bosco said she found Burmila's decisions "very frustrating."

Only one witness took the stand Tuesday. Savio's next-door neighbor and close friend Mary Pontarelli testified about finding Savio drowned in her dry bathtub in March 2004 after Peterson asked her to go inside Savio's house and look for her.

During her testimony, Pontarelli gasped and let out a sob when she was shown a photo of Savio's naked body curled in her bloody bathtub. Drew Peterson stared up at the same photo when it was flashed onto a large courtroom screen. He showed no emotion.

Read More: Drew Peterson Coverage on Patch

 

Political PR Machine August 02, 2012 at 01:20 AM
Professor Plum with therope, in the bathroom
G.Ryan August 02, 2012 at 04:06 PM
The justice system in this country protects the criminals and victimizes the victim and their families. Why would the judge not allow substantial evidence in this case? Because of hearsay? The woman is dead she cannot speak for herself. But she feared for her life from the Peterson Parasite. This judge should be taken off the case as the defense attorneys continue to manipulate the truth. Of course there was no struggle as the victim knew her attacker and he's a cop who is well versed in covering up his tracks....he had to have planted her body in the tub to look like it was a drowning.....guess, this is Joliet so called Justice for you!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something