This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Dr. Nate: Is Antibacterial Soap Really Necessary?

Colds and flu are viral, so anti-bacterial products have no effect.

By the looks of most bathrooms these days, just about everyone is using antibacterial soaps. In fact, it can take considerable detective skills to locate soap that isn’t antibacterial.

Advertising teaches us to fear germs. You sell more antibacterial soap that way. It’s even marketed as a preventative measure against colds and flu. The problem? Colds and flu are viral, so anti-bacterial products have no effect. Antibacterial soaps contain carcinogens, are no more effective in killing germs than regular soap and are probably responsible for breeding stronger, more resistant strains of bacteria.

The U.S. Center for Disease Control agrees. It recommends that the most effective way to reduce the spread of infectious disease is washing our hands. But anti-bacterial soaps are not necessary. Neither is scalding hot water, since our hands can’t withstand the temperatures necessary to kill germs with heat.

Find out what's happening in Genevawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Experts recommend that you use a combination of soap and comfortably warm water. Rub all surfaces of the hands for at least 20 seconds, especially under your fingernails. The soap and scrubbing action, along with the slippery surface created by the soap, do the trick.

Questions?  Comments?  Email Dr. Conroy @ drnate@thechiropracticpeople.com.

Find out what's happening in Genevawith free, real-time updates from Patch.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?