- Local every day in
I have lived in Geneva for over 13 years. After growing up in Chicago we moved to St. Charles when I was 16. There I graduated from St. Charles High School and married my High School sweetheart. We stayed in town and lived in St. Charles for a few years until finally moving to Geneva. Although there are always debates about which town is better and for which reasons, we have always loved Geneva. If life allowed, we would live here forever. Our three children are getting a wonderful education and the environment they are surrounded by is far and away better than what I had growing up.
So why the quick biography? Well, I am not trying to complete any "about me" pages nor am I trying to campaign for local government. I just wanted to express my feelings for the city that I call home. We have raised three children in Geneva and are very proud of the schools they attend and we always have been. Recently, however, our wonderful town has been divided by an issue that honestly, I never thought would show up in the same sentence as "we live in a town called Geneva." The Geneva school district is in open negotiations trying to either avoid or initiate a teachers strike.
As a matter of fact, it was only a couple months ago that the city of Chicago went through a similar situation. It was a citywide strike which caught many by surprise and angered even more. Then again, growing up in Chicago I am very familiar with teachers strikes. In the city's history there have been quite a few. It kind of makes sense. Chicago is a large metropolitan area with an overall lack of consistency across the board when it comes to the Board of Education. But here in Geneva, we are supposed to be protected from such things. Or at least that is what I assumed all these years.
So just what is it that brings such a "disconnect" to arise between the Geneva Teachers and our local Board of Education? Well, that is easy. It is the same thing that it always is when situations like this come up... money! I am not going to get into the details and specifics of the raging debate between the two sides. Doing so would only serve to alienate those who might read this article or at the very least anger some folks. I do not aim to do this. Not to mention there is plenty of specifics to be found on Geneva Patch. What I want to bring to the attention of my fellow Genevans is what is at stake here and what we stand to lose. And again, just like the cause of the possible strike is a common sticking point, so too are the people who will get hurt should this move into full scale war. The children.
Any time there is a strike in any industry it means that people refuse to occupy their posts. They plan to show those in power that if demands are not met the business will suffer due to the lack of productivity. It is a power struggle. The employees are trying to take the power back from the employers and vice-versa. They do this by ceasing all activities that create the product the company profits from. In the case of a teachers strike, that product is the students. Make no mistake here, sure the teachers teach but that is an intangible thing. They teach the kids and therefore it is the kids who are the product. If they do not have that education then the end result is a product that is missing some very important parts. Just like on an assembly line at Compaq for example. If the hard drive or network card is not installed in one of their computers, the end result is a product that is incomplete and will not work as promised. The same can be said about our kids in the event of a strike.
Now the strike has a date of Nov. 9th should a resolution not be attained before then. At least we are being given some warning about what will take place. I must also applaud the school district for their efforts to keep the schools open should a strike occur. If you ask me, and I know you're not, this says a lot about who we are and who we have running our schools. This is clearly the district acknowledging that it is not only the students who will suffer should a strike take place. I have not heard of many other places going through a strike and still maintaining a staff to ensure that the overall effects of the strike do not spill over into the economy of the community. I believe the district deserves a big "pat on the back" for making this decision.
So where do we go from here? Any time there is an emotional topic being discussed it is very hard for people to remain calm while expressing their opinions. This is understandable. I have likewise seen many comments from residents of Geneva (myself included) that are attempting to rally both sides and express their thoughts and opinions on the matter. Open discussion is great and I also applaud the Patch for providing a forum for these discussions to take place.
We must always remember, however, that we all live in Geneva and we all must continue to work and live together. Often times I am greeted during inclimate weather by someone that I would consider a "very incompetent operator of motor vehicles". When this happens my immediate knee-jerk reaction is to either shout an obscenity or to use some choice sign language to express my feelings at being cut off or worse. Thing is, something always stops me. What prevents me from turning into a road rage wannabe is the fact that I might have to deal with this person in the near future. When things like this happen it is usually easy to see the face of the other person, and they you.
So what happens when a verbal or non-verbal argument ensues and then two days later you are at the register paying for your coffee and the cashier is your vehicular adversary? See my point—we all have to live here ... together.
This is why we all must try and remain somewhat calm, civil, and make our best attempt to keep our common sense. We must remember that the children and their futures are what's at stake here and that nobody really wants this strike to take place. I know it is really easy to lose control when emotional subjects are the topic of conversation, but we are all reasonably intelligent adults and anyone who is involved in the conversation should be able to understand the consequences of it.
Teachers strikes are serious matters and so too are the reasons for it or against it. Hopefully we can try to educate our neighbors on the points of both sides and remain supportive. Not blindly, mind you, but supportive with a purpose. Whether you are supporting the teachers or the board we ALL must remember that we are neighbors and someday you might just need to borrow that rake from one of your neighbors.

Bob McQuillan
2:51 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
What you are talking abut here is a difference of opinion and that is not necessarily a bad thing. As you stated, this issue is and never has been about the quality of education or the quality of the educational staff. This issue has always been about money and benefits. This is not a personal issue of neighbor against neighbor, this is a difference of opinion on the direction the district needs to take in the future. This issue is also not confined to the teachers agreement. This issue, a financial one, is going to be the basis for many decisions over the next decade. We find ourselves in a situation where enrollment is declining, property values are declining, expenses are increasing, property taxes are increasing, revenue is decreasing (unless levy is increased) and the GEA is requesting salary and benefit increases. If all that were not bad enough, we have $306 million in debt service that can no longer be ignored. Next year, school taxes on an "average" house will increase more than $400, if the board approves a 0% tax levy. The board, in at least the last 17 years, has never approved a 0% tax levy. We can spend time on discussing how we got here but that isn't going to help us find a solution. Till this point, the GEA has refused to admit the district is in poor financial shape and believes they are entitled to part of the reserve fund. They are not "entitled" to the fund. This community needs to look at the big picture instead of just the teachers agreement.
Kathy M
4:01 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Illinois posted the fourth biggest state total, with 151,304 properties receiving a foreclosure filing in 2010
http://www.realtytrac.com/content/press-releases/record-29-million-us-properties-receive-foreclosure-filings-in-2010-despite-30-month-low-in-december-6309
412 foreclosures presently listed as of the week of Oct. 29th
http://www.realtytrac.com/mapsearch/il/kane-county/geneva/60134/?address=60134&parsed=1&ct=geneva&cn=kane county&zp=60134&stc=il&lat=41.885864&lon=-88.310085
As of the census[11] of 2010 there are 26,652 people, 6,718 households, and 5,186 families residing in the city.
Foreclosures are dangerously close to 10% of the family population and have been high for several years and the union still thinks it wise to tap a "surplus"? Non-union staff (including the teachers' aides who are not allowed to qualify for benefits) have been in a pay freeze for 2-3 years, how can teachers let the union lead them on this path and still look them in the face? Instead of a Masters maybe they should re-take a course in Consumer Education.
Tony Pronenko
7:03 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
While it is certainly true that there is much more at stake here than just the teachers and the deal they get/do not get, the community has put it's focus squarely on the GEA and BOE. Bob and Kathy you both bring up some very good points about the local economy, housing market, and the effects that it has on other surrounding economic factors. In most of the articles that I have read about the strike only a few really get into the hard facts about how the strike will effect the area relative to which way it turns out. Now I am no expert on the current teachers contract or what apparently is wrong with it. I do know 3 people who are teachers and each of these three people had at least 5-10 years of experience teaching between them. All three of them would have given ANYTHING to work in this district. However, they could not get in for whatever reason and had to take jobs elsewhere. If the contracts were so terrible here, why do so many want to work here?
Bob McQuillan
7:54 pm on Saturday, November 3, 2012
Tony, the key elements for Geneva are it's demographics, parental involvement and quality teachers. You might want to play with the ranking order but those are the three key ingredients. In the past neighbors in small groups would complain about the taxes but would never dare question the BOE, GEA or the teachers. When the real estate market crashed in 2008 and assessments dropped and taxes increased, people started to question what was going on. When all other area district union's gave concessions in 2009-10, people really started to question why Geneva did not. The GEA took silence from the community as a message of support. The GEA made a major mistake by asking for more in this contract. Each week their statements got worse and the communty woke up.
While this has been a difficult situation to live through, I believe it is the correction that Geneva needed. Actually, it is a correction that every district will need to go through over the next 4 years. Assessments will continue to fall and if overall expenses are not reduced, local districts will face a financial crisis that they may not be able to recover from. Geneva has a short window to plan for the next 10 years and the teachers agreement is only the first step. Next up is the tax levy.
We can make it but everyone needs to understand the the issues and we need to get on the same page. Geneva is a great place to live or work but if we don't face our problems, they will change the fabric of this town forever.
Kim
9:31 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
There is no doubt that the strike is going to impact the community. But instead of tearing us apart. Perhaps we should look at this as an opportunity to set things right. Union organized labor in our schools is out of step with our community. There is no need for it and it hinders real credible teaching. The union has sold the teachers a bill of goods and its taking our money to funnel into it's own political agenda. None of which is serving the people of Geneva well.
What would our schools look like if the unions were thrown out? Would we pay gym teachers over $100,000? Probably not. But we would pay for innovators who could motivate and excite the students to learn math and science, which by the way according to the recent report card is not improving.
The system is broken. The union is holding us hostage. We can wait it out and give them what they want or we can start fresh.
Dave
9:37 pm on Sunday, November 4, 2012
You're absolutely right Kim, the union is holding the education process hostage. Not only here in good old Geneva, but all over the country.
Fixing it is going to be a long process. On state and national levels, the teachers unions are among the biggest political campaign contributors. They have bought pols at every level and that why it's mandated that public school teachers kick back a portion of their salaries to the union.
We can change it, in fact, we HAVE to change it - but it's going to be a battle