Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

QuickStory: School Board Calls Special Meeting to Deal With Kindergarten Enrollment Bubble

The Geneva School District 304 Board of Education is considering busing as an option to avoid adding staff at Mill Creek and Williamsburg elementary schools.

 

Geneva School District 304 will hold a special meeting July 9 to deal with a kindergarten enrollment bubble at Mill Creek and Williamsburg elementary schools that could push classroom sizes as high as 30 students this fall.

Board members tabled an agenda item Monday that included a staff recommendation to add one kindergarten section—and the appropriate teaching staff—to each elementary school.

School Board members said they needed more information in order to make a decision and asked staff members to look into alternative short-term solutions, including busing students to other elementary schools.

School Board member Matt Henry suggested that busing some Mill Creek kindergarten students to Fabyan Elementary might be a "no-brainer" solution, since some Mill Creek families live almost as close to Fabyan as to Mill Creek Elementary. Similarly, he said, some Williamsburg kindergarten students live relatively close to Western Avenue School.

Board President Mark Grosso noted that Fabyan Elementary School is about a mile away from Mill Creek Elementary.

"I can appreciate everyone’s concern about the class sizes at Mill Creek," Grosso said. "But I’d like to see us look at the available resources we have before we hire additional personnel."

Mill Creek parents spoke passionately in favor of the staff proposal to add teachers, reduce class sizes and avoid busing students to other schools.

"No matter what the enrollment issue is, a single family should not be segregated from their immediate neighbors," Dan Solzman told the board in the first public comments session.

"I don’t want to have my son or others lost in a room of 27 students," said Melissa Swierczewski. "I realize there is a budget and that the state is not helpful. (But) any rational taxpayer would applaud that third section at Mill Creek."

Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources Craig Collins said enrollment projections show class sizes at Mill Creek at 27 and 28 students. Williamsburg's three sections would be at 26, 26 and 25 students. Those numbers probably are on the low end, he said.

"If the past is any guide, we are likely to increase kindergarten enrollment at each school over the next nine weeks, pushing class size at the kindergarten level to near 30 students per classroom," Collins said in a memo to Superintendent Kent Mutchler.

Collins said the Catch 22 about postponing a vote is that parents need to know where their kids will be—and whether they are in a morning or afternoon session—in order to make plans for day care and transportation. The board generally makes its decision in the last week of June so that parents can be informed by the first week in July.

"To the extent that we can give them this information early, we try to do that," he said.

But board members stood their ground, saying they would like to know the kindergarten enrollment numbers at other district schools, as well as the cost of busing or other alternatives before agreeing to add staff.

"We have to be able to speak to the cost," board member Bill Wilson said. "If it’s moving from Fabyan to Mill Creek, what is that plan going to look like? We need to have a couple plans in place and be able to tell people this is what’s going to happen."

School Board members agreed that it's time to start looking at redistricting as a long-term solution to the elementary-school enrollment issue. However, they also acknowledged that process takes time.

"I think the last time we did a boundary study was five or six years ago," Wilson said "It might be time to do a gut check. Are those boundaries right or do we need to change those boundaries? I think we need to look at that and see if it’s time to run that study."

But if the board is planning to change school boundaries, another problem arises—the potential disruption of students, who might have to change schools more than once.

"If it’s something we all acknowledge, I would be disinclined to do much moving this year," said School Board Vice President Kelly Nowak. "I’m perfectly happy to wait and look at the numbers. I’m inclined to go ahead and approve this knowing it’s not a final recommendation. I don’t want to move kids for a short-term solution. That’s just a waste of everybody’s time."

Mill Creek parents at the meeting agreed.

"If you rezone again, my kids would be making three transitions in three years," Stacie Solzman said. "I am asking, for the next year at least, to minimize the movement of students. ... If you’re just going to move my kids and rezone in a year, at that age, you have a problem."

"I don’t think slapping on a Band-Aid … is the right solution for our children," Swierczewski said. "Why do we have boundaries if we’re just going to ignore them?"

Patrick Murphy, a former school superintendent in Berwyn, now a Geneva resident, said it's unfair to teachers, students and parents to have one school with 28 kids in a kindergarten class and another with 17. He said it is also unfair to ask the School Board to make a decision without enrollment numbers in front of them.

"I think the board can’t make a financial decision on the whim of angry parents," he said. "It’s not fair to the taxpayers to add expenses to do that. I think with a little smarter administration … you can avoid these kinds of problems at the last minute."

Related Topics: Geneva School Board, Kindergarten Sections, Mill Creek Elementary School, School District 304, and Williamsburg Elementary School

Lynda Johnson

7:44 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I'm not a parent at Williamsburg or Mill Creek, however, I am a parent with 5 children, 4 of whom still in the Geneva School system. I think it's ridiculous to bus one grade to another school. I agree that the boundaries need to be revisited and if neighborhoods need to moved to a different elementary then so be it, but to move only certain grades or individual families on a street or block isn't looking at the big picture. The staffing should be added now and this issue needs to be the priority going forward so these families aren't moving from school to school or worse having half their family at one school and half at another when they're a grade apart.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Becki

8:40 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I second that thought!

Dwight Swartwood

10:06 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Yes, let's add staff at any cost. I believe that is what Lynda said.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Avett Green

7:16 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

That's what I read also, Dwight.

Elconejo

10:24 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Congratulations to the board for considering utilizing our resources to the max. We can talk all day about the ideal way for things to be in a perfect world. Unfortunately, times are tough. I'm happy to see the board consider what is fiscally responsible while still in the best interests of all our children. The glass isn't always half empty. My district had to do this when I was in 3rd grade, and it was a very positive experience. I formed friendships that continue today, and I had the advantage of knowing more kids than most did when I got to middle school where everyone converges. My mother fought tooth and nail against the busing, but that was just my mother thing to do the best thing-- what she thought best. Find the positives. They are definitely there. All children matter and they can be best served if we are fiscally responsible.

Reply

Melissa Swierczewski

10:56 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

A school boundary study is the obvious answer to this issue. But that is not going to happen in the next 3 weeks, but rather will happen during the 2012-1013 school year to be implemented for the 2013-2014 school year. So in the mean time, for this ONE school year, the school board needs to approve a half-time teacher for a new kindergarten section at MCES. Then, NEXT YEAR, after they boundary study is complete, everyone in the district can be shuffled around to where the numbers are best suited. The board members admitted at last night's meeting that approval of this ONE additional part time staff member would NOT be putting the numbers outside of the salary budget. So if we have the space at MCES, we have the dollars budgeted for this already, and we have two overflowing rooms of kindergartners, why not approve a third room? Why are we opening a whole new can of worms in discussing busing a dozen kids to a completely different school where their siblings don't attend, their neighbors don't attend, they can't walk to it as they could MCES, etc. Why do we even have these boundaries if we aren't going to follow them? When I purchased my house, I was under the impression my students would be attending the school three blocks away within the boundaries, not whatever school the board feels like sending my kids to that particular year. Would those opposed to the third section feel the same way if it was THEIR young child getting sent off? I think not!

Reply
Comment_arrow

dan

2:56 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

"Why do we even have these boundaries if we aren't going to follow them?"

When purchasing a home, every concerned parent asks a realtor, where is the school that my kids will attend? Parents consider the proximity of a house to a school, part of the decision to purchase a home. That is why boundaries are drawn. Use the boundaries or fix them!

Comment_arrow

Avett Green

7:26 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Dan, guess what. Situations change everyday. Realtors want to SELL, SELL, SELL! They can only tell you where your children's school is for that single day you are buying the house, and they're certainly not going to mention that school boundaries can change according to population "bubbles" or school board decisions.

Comment_arrow

Thomas

7:55 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Yes Dan,
It is totally unreasonable to think that someone, who is about to make what most likely will be the largest single investment in their lifetime, should be told what school their child will attend. NO GUARANTEES!!!! If you don't like it, too bad so sad. Don't let the realtor sign hit your rear end on the way out of town. What is far more important is that the people who bought their homes 20 years ago and whose kids have already been through the system can be assured their taxes will remain the same or get smaller so they are not forced to sell to what most likely will be young parents who will continue to make unreasonable demands like having their kids go to a neighborhood school

Comment_arrow

dan

9:27 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sorry, my realtor comment may not have been clear. I did not say a realtor guaranteed that my kids would go to a certain school. My realtor is great. The point I was trying to make was that everyone who has kids considers the location of their home to an elementary school. That is why boundaries are drawn.

Beth Bales

11:10 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Melissa -- I'm not arguing on one side or the other. I'm more asking a question. It sounds from the story as though it's not ONE section, it's TWO, one for Mill Creek and one for Williamsburg. Am I correct? So that does make a change in numbers, I'm guessing.

Boundary changes are hard issues, and emotional. I don't envy anyone involved, not one bit.

And by the way, when my oldest daughter, who's now 24, was in kindergarten (in Geneva) all four sections were at 30 or 31. I still consider it, all these years later, as essentially a lost year, despite good teachers. There were just too many kids in the room.

Reply

Amy Wiedenhoeft

11:29 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

This seems way too late in the game to be making this decision! Our kindergartners have already been to orientation at their school, met their teachers, and sent in registration. It is obvious that a boundary study needs to be done, but you don't make this kind of decision one week before the kids find out if they're going to be in morning or afternoon kindergarten.

Additionally, my son was in kindergarten at Williamsburg two years ago and they had four section with eighteen students in each class. That's a total of 76 students. The numbers listed above for Williamsburg total 77. Why was it ok to have four sections 2 years ago? If this enrollment is expected to continue why don't that just have four sections of kindergarten like they always have?

This is such a short sighted proposition and it shocks me that the board would consider this. It seems like it is going to stir up a lot of drama, anger and resentment. If you're going to make a needed boundary change do it after much thought, consideration, and study. It's always going to be hard for people, but this quick of a change with so little thought put into it is not something I would expect from a school board that cares about children.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amy Wiedenhoeft

12:56 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I keyed the number wrong - my son's class two years ago had 72, not 77 kids and they still had 4 classes. If they're saying Williamsburg will have close to 30 kids in each class - isn't that 90 kids total? Wouldn't 4 sections be 22-23 kids in each class? Am I missing something? Isn't that the class numbers we aim for?

Comment_arrow

Geneva resident

8:41 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I agree 100%! My upcoming kindergartener would be affected by this. And we're talking about adding a half of a day of a teacher. Ridiculous!

Sabine Falco

12:35 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Perfectly stated Lynda!
But so I can get this straight...basically my child will be segregated because we're new here. He will be bussed to a nearby school we aren't zoned for so that we can "even out" the numbers and justify the 64 million taxpayer dollars wasted on a school that can't even hit capacity or half capacity so that the books look good?
This isn't about what happened 30 years ago and what great experiences some of you had making friends. This is about splitting up neighborhoods and segregating new people, kids without siblings in school yet and basically a big cover up to justify poor past choices. Wow! Congrats district 304! You can finally make the numbers add up to make it look like you built an elementary school based on true need! All this at the expense of the emotional well being of our children.

Reply

Sabine Falco

1:06 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Amy,
The elderly Geneva citizens attending and voting on our kindergarten class sizes stated that kindergarten is merely "milk and cookies.". They don't care about us, our children or our community's reputation for superb education. It's been at least half a century since they've had school aged kids.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dan

2:15 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The people against adding a teacher are not affected by this, obviously. Everyone is self serving, it's natural. I just think the agenda of a 5 year olds education is more important than any other agenda.

I would like to hear from a parent who lives a couple blocks from a school volunteer to, put their 5 year old on a bus for over 30 minutes a day and drive them to a school further away. Yes, the kids who are picked up first can sit on a bus for well over 15 minutes one way as the bus meanders through neighborhoods to pickup others. There are adults who will not commute to work that long because it is too much time in a car. Now I can see sitting on the bus longer for middle school or High school but we are talking about 5 year olds here. It’s about the children people, the children!

Sabine Falco

3:01 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Wow...that means half the time spent in the classroom will be spent on a bus. Now that makes sense!

Reply

msking

3:34 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

My daughter will begin Williamsburg Elementary this fall as a Kindergartner. As being a first time parent entering District 304 this is the last thing that I want to worry about 2 months before school starts. When will I know if my daughter will be bussed to a completely different school than what we went to registration for, filled out the paperwork for, and had a mini introduction into her "future" classroom with her "future" teachers? This is too little, too late. We pay enough to live where we live and for our children to go to these schools. There is no reason whatsoever that extra staffing cannot be provided. Even if it is just for this year until they figure out how to re-study boundries. And July 9th? Sure! Let's wait another 2 weeks to figure it out! It's not like time is ticking or anything.

Reply

Susan

4:11 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

This all began for Mill Creek two years ago when my son entered Kindergarten for the '10-'11 school year. That is when we went from two kindergarten teacher to one when we were told there were not enough kids enrolled to warrant the two teachers. If I remember correctly we had 22-24 kids in our afternoon class at the end of the year. For is 1st. grade class we went from 3 teachers to 2 for the '11-'12 school year where by the end of the school year we had 28 kids in our class and close to the same for the other 1st grade class. And now the word is that once again my son's 2nd grade class will go from 3 teachers to 2 because we don't have enough kids enrolled to warrant the third teacher. Really? 28 kids PER CLASS is not enough to warrant a third teacher? By the way, we are the ONLY grade in the school that continues to loose a teacher each year, though our class size remains among the highest in the school. Had we not lost our second teacher in kindergarten two years ago, we may not be in the situation we are in today with the incoming kindergartners. Early education is so very important and we need to make sure our children have every advantage they can for their upper grades. Perhaps if we spent more time with our early grade kids we will not have to spend more money for specialized reading teachers for the upper grades. Just a thought....

Reply

Sabine Falco

4:24 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

PLEASE email the board! Make your voice heard! Show up on 7/9 as advocates for our children!

Reply

Amy Wiedenhoeft

4:29 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I also wanted to mention that I just received an email from the board regarding the meeting last night. It does not mention moving kids around, it simply says that they will hold a meeting to decide whether to hire an additional teacher at Williamsburg and Mill Creek. I find it pretty deceitful to not disclose that they are considering moving students. I am very thankful that the Patch made all of us aware of what was really discussed.

Reply

Lynda Johnson

5:30 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Although it may feel better to vent on the patch, remember that only a letter to the board or comments at the meeting will impact their decision.

Reply

Bob McQuillan

6:03 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I'm going to step in here and defend the school board. I attended last night's meeting and the board did not make any decision other than to set up a special meeting for July 9th. This is a meeting that they were not required to hold. They felt they didn't have enough information to make an informed decision, that is what we elected them to do, make an informed decision. Here is the exact wording on class size from the current teachers contract: "At the elementary level, when a class size in grades K-2 reaches twenty-six (26) students, and in grade levels 3-5 reaches twenty-eight (28) students, the principal will review with the teachers and other related staff, the need for additional classroom support. The summary of that review will be forwarded to the Superintendent. If, at the elementary level, a teacher’s individual class exceeds twenty-nine (29) students, the teacher will receive additional support from a teacher assistant for at least two and one half hours (2.5) per day exclusive of any existing special education assistants."
Where is the summary of the required report, all that was discussed was what the numbers are and they "might" go higher. It is my understanding from the comments last night, that there are already assistants for these classes and it is quite possible these are certified teachers because of the lack of full time teacher positions. I'm not as concerned about the class size as I'm the boundary issue. I'l comment on that below.

Reply

Sabine Falco

6:14 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

What many people don't know is that new families are being DENIED initial registration at Mill Creek Elementary even though as you stated, nothing has been decided. I wonder why that is...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

6:54 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Are they being DENIED or being told that their child might not attend Mill Creek Elementary? There is a difference. Again, no one is guaranteed attendance at any particular school.

Bob McQuillan

6:49 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Since Geneva has "neighborhood schools", everyone believes their child will attend the closest school. The only guarantee a parent has is that your child will have a seat somewhere in the District. Shodeen falsely advertised that Mill Creek had a school in the neighborhood and that is where the children would go. Good Real Estate agents don't tell you what school your child will attend because they don't know, boundaries could change at any time. That is why the MLS sheet lists the District but not a specific school. No District employee will guarantee a school based on where you live for the same reason.
Does it make sense to assume if you buy a house 3 blocks from an elementary school your kids will go there? Of course it does, but reality is you received no guarantee where you kids would go. This is the real problem not class size, kids can adapt to class size. This will only be solved by a boundary change and those that are unhappy now will be happy and those happy now will probably throw a hisssy fit if their kids need to change schools. In the end, the kids will adjust to their new school, everything will be fine and parents will forget about the fit they threw. It appears that we have two sections of kindergarten that will be affected this year, lets make the smart decision. The parents need to calm down, understand the situation and allow the board to make a decision on the 9th. I have faith they will take into account all options and decide what is best.

Reply

Amy Wiedenhoeft

7:06 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Bob, it is very obvious that you are for saving money at any cost. Would you just like to put all the kindergartners is the district in one classroom with one teacher? That would save a ton of money! Every time there are uneven numbers at any grade level should we just switch the kids around? That sounds like pure chaos. I've never heard of a school doing that. How far are you willing to go to save money? If Williamsburg is expecting 90 kindergartners, it is extremely reasonable to have 4 classes with 22-23 kids in each. And for the record there have been 2 full time kdg teachers at Williamsburg until this past year when enrollment decreased. The kdg enrollment for the upcoming year is completely consistent with years past when there were four sections.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

8:35 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Amy
Yes, I'm for cutting expenses but not at any cost. Your ridiculous comment about putting all the children in one classroom is exactly the hype that I'm talking about. Go ahead throw a hissy fit right in front of your child and get them all upset for no reason. No one said Williamsburg will have 90 kindergarteners with 30 kids in each section. The last boundary change was 5 years ago and no one says to switch kids around every year. This is a public school system that needs to meet everyone's needs not just yours. You are twisting the truth and the board hasn't even made a decision. You are not "entitled" to a kindergarten classroom that has 15-17 kids unless you send your kids to a private school. We are talking about a half day kindergarten which amounts to 2 1/2 hours per day. Your child is not going to be harmed because there are 28 kids in the class for one year.

Comment_arrow

Amy Wiedenhoeft

8:56 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Bob - here's the quote I'm referring to: "If the past is any guide, we are likely to increase kindergarten enrollment at each school over the next nine weeks, pushing class size at the kindergarten level to near 30 students per classroom," Collins said in a memo to Superintendent Kent Mutchler.
Thirty times three is 90. If you divide 90 by 4, you get 22-23 in a classroom.
And when did I say I wanted 15-17 kids in a classroom? In fact, though I wouldn't be thrilled with 28 kids in the class, that isn't what I'm concerned about. I'm concerned about switching the kids for one year. I have another child at Williamsburg and am not going to get them to two different schools at the same time, especially when I'm two blocks away from Williamsburg.

Also, if you read my previous comments, I am completely for a boundary study, and if needed change. I do not think making a decision to switch kids after they have already had their orientation, met their teachers, and registered is beneficial.

I am a rational person that can see every side of the issue. I would like you to think about telling your five year old that they cannot go to the same school as their brother, the school that they've already been to and gotten used to. I understand that changes need to be made to accommodate everyone, but not this late in the game. If a change needs to be made let's figure out the correct long term solution instead of a band aid approach.

Sabine Falco

7:19 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

They were DENIED until they made some noise. Just ask the MCES school secretary. I'm sure it's no secret or maybe it is a big cover up.
Imagine living in an area where you just moved from half way across the country. You don't know anyone but your neighbors who thankfully have children your children's ages and are grateful enough to offer to help you in times of need. Say you're husband is traveling, your baby is sick and your Kindergartener needs to be picked up from school for an emergency situation. Oh no! All the neighbor kids are bused to another school and on a field trip that day! Who do you call? Remember...half way across the country...no family, only neighbors. Let's not just try to make the bottom line add up. There are real live PEOPLE and CHILDREN involved!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

9:45 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Amy

Again, for me, the issue isn't about class size. It is about moving a child out of their "neighborhood school." I don't believe that makes sense. The fact that another sibling is already at a school makes the decision even easier.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

9:55 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Sabine
They may have denied registration at Mill Creek elementary but they should not have be denied registration in the district. I don't know the specific circumstances so I don't know what was said. I would not be happy with the situation but where you live doesn't guarantee your children will go to a particular school. If people were under that impression when they purchased their home, they received wrong advice or didn't think to ask the question.
Our family was in the same situation you described 15 years ago. Your example is believable but not something that the school district is responsible to plan for. The district needs to serve thousands of children and while they do the best they can, they can't make their plans around individual situations.

Becki

7:49 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Ok Bob,
When your kid is standing on the corner waiting for a bus with friends and they get on one bus while your kids get on another how do you think they'll feel or when the kids are going to a school function and your kid is sitting watching them go but they can't, what do you say? Sorry you didn't make the cut. I have worked for a school for 28 years and kids shouldn't have to adjust in this matter. Kids have enough on there plates in this day and age, pressure of test scores, bullying and sometimes home life. Are you forgetting what a community is, why we move into one? Not to send our kids to another! This should be about kids NOT the almighty numbers. This is not a “corporate business” but yet everyone wants to run it like a big business. This is the business of making happy children into good citizens.
Maybe this district needs to look at Multiage classrooms for a year or two to average out numbers without kicking children out of their base school. There are a lot of great benefits to it. Many schools have gone all multiage and it has worked out beautifully. What about the schools that have a low enrolment, bring one or two teachers over to Mill Creek till the boundaries are worked out? There are many solutions without kicking kids out of neighborhood schools. If you do that you surely don’t belong in a school district you belong in the cut throat business world, you are not thinking of our kids!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

8:49 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Becki
You didn't read my posting. I said that, in my opinion, the problem wasn't class size the problem is kids not going to the school closest to their home. I agree that sending 1 or 2 children out of the neighborhood doesn't make sense. What I was trying to explain is that, according to the district rules, NO ONE is guaranteed their children will go to a particular school.
Also to your point, every child that goes to a private school faces the example that you just wrote about. They get on different buses, if they are bused, they go to different schools, they have different school functions yet that all seem to survive just fine. The difference is, of course, that the parents choose to send their kids to a different school. Those kids adjust well because the parents have a good attitude about the school their kids are attending. I'm suggesting that if the District decides it is best to bus children to a different school for one year, it is not the end of the world. If the parents understand the situation and present it in a good light, they will be amazed how their child will adjust. Just ask the parents that didn't want their kids to go from Western Ave to Coultrap 5 years ago? Within 6 months the vast majority would not have sent their kids back to Western. As with any situation your child faces, it is what the parents make of it. If the parents are upset the child will be upset. If the parents are understanding and have a good attitude, the child will also.

Sabine Falco

8:23 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Beckie,
Please email the board too!
Board@geneva304.org
And I think the superintendent is KMutchler@geneva304.org
And don't forget 7/9 meeting!

Reply

Bob Johnson

8:55 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I love that some here post ad nauseum on any tax issue imploring people to get involved and regularly bashing the school board. When an issue comes up that would require additional expenditures, an outpouring of support is then met with calls of "hissy fits" and a need to "calm down," Now we learn that the same individuals are experts in the impact of class size on your child education. I'm glad our community is blessed with these "experts" to shepherd us through adulthood.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

10:10 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I have gone to Geneva school board meetings for more than 10 years and my wife and I have raised 3 children, so I think I know just a bit about how kids react and how this school board operates. Our children have moved 4 times and have had to adjust to new neighborhoods and yes, new schools. Several times I was at the new location 3 months before the rest of the family arrived. Yes, there were issues to deal with but every one of the kids adjusted to the change because my wife and I were positive whenever we spoke to them, even if we weren't always positive ourselves. Our last move the kids were in 3rd, 7th & 10th grade. It wasn't easy, especially for the 10th grader, but we were together as a family which was the most important thing. All have graduated college and have started their adult lives without any social or emotional needs due to changing schools. Actually they have had many experiences that their cousins have and will ever have. While every child is different, I stand by the statement that the parent's attitude is key to any change kids need to go through.

Comment_arrow

Avett Green

8:05 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Rhonda Lee
15 seconds ago
Bob, your comment right below this one is ON THE MONEY. We don't give children enough credit for how quickly they can change and adjust. When my children were younger, my husband's career required that we relocate several times, usually across country where we had no family or support system and usually in the middle of a school year. Each time we worried about how they would handle leaving their old friends and school and how they would transition to a new area, but my husband and I kept it to ourselves. And you know what? Each time they amazed us! Children will respond to a new situation depending on how it's presented to them, whether positively or negatively. Kindergarteners have nothing to compare it to, so they'll adapt very quickly. So they'll have "school" friends and they'll have "neighborhood" friends, the more friends the better! Parents are the ones who get their panties in a knot, not the kids. BTW, those moves in my children's school lives? They aren't even a blip on the radar now that they are adults.

Comment_arrow

Stacie

8:11 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Rhonda,
I'm wondering if any of the neighborhoods you moved into, bussed your kids out of the neighborhood to go to a different school for a year and then moved them back to your home school the following year? That would mean three new schools in three years for your kids!

Comment_arrow

Avett Green

9:02 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

No, Stacie, they didn't change schools 3 times in 3 years in the same neighborhood, but they DID attend two different schools IN THE SAME YEAR in different cities and in different states and in different sections of the country FOUR times.

Comment_arrow

Avett Green

9:08 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Correction, Stacie, if your child starts school in Mill Creek, then changes to Fabyan for a year, then goes back to Mill Creek -- that's two "new" schools, not three, because they're returning to a school they already know.

Comment_arrow

Stacie

9:23 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sorry, Rhonda. Maybe you should have been given all the facts before commenting on my situation. We just moved here with our Kindergartener and Second Grader. Both of my students will be forced to attend Fabyan next year and then return to Mill Creek the following year. That makes three schools in three years. The other point I would like to make is that this is a choice being dictated to me, not one that I willfully chose for my children. So I don't know if that makes me ahead if that is the game we are playing. I will also be paying off that debt next year that everyone is screaming about that my children didn't reap the benefits from. Your Welcome! I'm guessing you don't have a Kindergarten student who is affected by this. I'm also assuming you lived in Geneva during the time this debt was incurred and you weren't doing much screaming then. Now you are doing the screaming because you don't want to pay the taxes anymore, but you want us to pay the taxes to pay off your debt. In the same instance, you want my kids to be bused out of their neighborhood so this can happen. Welcome to Geneva!!!!

Comment_arrow

Avett Green

9:55 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I'm sorry, Stacie, that you think we're playing a "game"; you asked me a question and I answered it. I do not envy your situation. Been there, done that, and I'm just saying our children are more resilient than we realize. The school transfers my children made were dictated also by my husband's career, not our choices. As far as the math about 3 schools in 3 years, that is correct. However, in your first comment you said "3 NEW schools in 3 years," which is what my correction was referring to.

John R

8:57 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Good luck parents. You are going to have to build a very strong case for the addition of sections. This is a very fiscally conservative school board. You will need to get as many parents as possible to attend the special meeting on July 9th.

Write yor emails and start knocking on doors. Figure out your strategy you will be up against a lot of resistence not just from the school board but from other groups as well. Get your supporters to the meeting on July 9th.

One thought......could they combine sections at another elementary school and shift a teacher or two too the schools that need an added section??? Probably not but maybe that could be considered.

Good luck,

John Rice

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

10:18 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

"This is a very fiscally conservative school board."

Anyone who has followed this board for more than 3 months knows that this statement is far from the truth. Until very, very recently, this board agreed to the vast majority of requests made by the administration. Just check the meeting minutes and the voting results. It is true that the board has to now look closely at all expenditures because of mounting debt and other increasing expenses.

If the need is there, this board will hire the necessary teachers to provide a good kindergarten experience.

Comment_arrow

Mr. Gibson

10:32 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Very fiscally conservative board? John, this board has consistently spent and taxed at the highest levels permitted by law.

Glen

10:47 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

27 kids in a kindergarten class! The horror! Float a bond issue and build some new schools ASAP!!

Reply

G.Ryan

11:13 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

And Glen we were told at the Board meeting last night the class is approximately 2.0 to 2.5 hours long and they have an aide along with a teacher in the classroom already. If the Board needs to restructure to avoid additional costs it is a reasonable remedy. But all this emotion, I wish there was more emotion to institute a remedy to solute the 321 MILLION DEBT this community faces in the future. Now that is a MAJOR problem. If this Board was so conservative it would have mandated fiscal responsibility to avoid a debt situation.

Reply

Stacie

12:35 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

My kids will be impacted by the busing issue described at Mill Creek. I don't consider myself throwing a "hissy" fit, but rather advocating for what I feel is right for my kids. We are new to Geneva (3 weeks and running) and have a Kindergartener and Second Grader. I agree with Bob, in that children will adapt to change; however, I think it is unfair to ask kids to change three schools in three years. That is something I think even I would have a difficult time with as an adult. I understand the Board is in a difficult position, but all I am asking is if you're going to make a needed boundary change do it after much thought, consideration, and study. Don't hand pluck my children from a neighborhood and send them to a different school to only then address a much larger problem and rezone accordingly. Why not leave the kids where they are for a year, while making a well-informed and much needed rezoning change? I have addressed my concerns with the Board members and would encourage you to do the same. I will be at the July 9 meeting, not as an irate parent screaming at the Board about class size; but, rather a concerned parent who wants to address the bigger picture.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

9:38 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Stacie
I didn't mean to imply that you are throwing a hissy fit. Those that have spoken at the board meetings have handled themselves extremely well during a difficult period for them and their kids. My comment about "hissy fit" which I knew everyone would key in on, was about the boundary change discussion. I have seen it happen everywhere we have lived. Parents don't want their children to move but expect that others should move. Believe me, and I think board members will agree, making boundary changes is one of the most difficult things that any school district will live through..
It needs to be done and I agree that no movement should be done this year if a boundary study is planned for this school year.

Stacie

12:36 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

It is extremely difficult to put on a "happy" face for my children every day when they continually ask what school they will be going to and I have to answer somewhere in Geneva. They are little and are looking for security and familiarity. Even though we have been granted initial enrollment at Mill Creek, I don't want to confuse them. Transitions are so difficult for kids that we were hoping by moving at the beginning of summer we would be able to provide them with some stability. I am greatly saddened that I too can't be more excited about moving to Geneva.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Avett Green

8:15 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Stacie, parenting IS difficult! It's the most difficult job you'll ever have. Trust me, putting on a "happy" face is the EASIEST thing you'll have to do once they become teenagers.

Thomas

5:39 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

All this emotion....And Irony!!! Apparently there might be a new "pitchfork and torches" crowd showing up at the school board meetings. Hopefully the school board will make the right choice or we might have a new demographic "leaving by the truckloads", and then who will buy the homes from all the other "truckloads" leaving? I don't know how one can stand so much HYPERBOLE!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert

5:51 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

@Thomas. It really is a hoot to witness the tax FACTS folks asking folks to remain calm and don't get hysterical. Really is ironic.

dan

7:44 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

As I get older and wiser, I still have a lot more growing-up to do, I find myself wanting the best for everyone, especially all kids. Just because I had some tough times growing up, doesn’t mean other kids should.

I sure the heck did not move here to live on an ocean, for a mountain view, for the weather, or for a job (I drive to Chicago every day). I moved here for the schools. The taxes here are high but I burden that finance, for the schools. I moved here for my kids. I expect that the majority of people live here for that same reason. That is why I would like the board to consider what is best for the kids.

A school district that debates the idea of adding a teacher to an over crowded grade scares me. Add the teacher already. Some decisions like purchasing a new curriculum, drawing new boarder lines or building a new school should be debated at length.

Reply

Sabine Falco

8:04 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

So many people are missing the point and arguing just to argue. At the end of the day, all of our Geneva schools are great! What we the parents who this is affecting are upset about is the singling out of our children to be sent to another school for a year while rezoning happens. My culdesac has 8 houses. My family only knows our neighbors since we just moved here from Florida. Please don't single us out because we are new. Send my son to the same school as the only friends he knows, where we are zoned. That's my point and that is my simple request.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

9:27 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sabine
I agree with that request, it makes all the sense in the world. A kindergarten child doesn't know what is or is not a large class size. With a good teacher and 1 or 2 assistants, their experience can be fantastic. This is a half-day program for one year. Three "teachers" in the room would bring the ratio down to 10:1. Maybe there could be a system where parents would volunteer to help the teacher and assistant. With 180 days of school and 30 kids in a class that would mean each parent needs to spend 6 half days in the classroom each year. Many parents would jump at that opportunity.
This is a tough situation but thinking outside the box could turn this into a great opportunity for everyone involved.

Comment_arrow

Bob Johnson

11:36 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I have an idea. You can show up at a classroom one morning and become a "teacher" and we'll send someone to your office to do your "profession." I'm assuming no education or experience is required to do what you do. It is laughable and somewhat offensive that any adult in a classroom is a "teacher." It is this kind of thinking that marginalizes the role of educators (with degrees and certifications) in our culture.

Betty Oetting

9:53 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Some years ago the south Mill Creek kids started out at Mill Creek Elementary, then were moved to Western Avenue, then moved to Fabyan. They all turned out just fine.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Avett Green

11:07 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

You're right, Betty, I had forgotten about that. Yep, all those students meet up again in middle school and high school anyway, and friendships turn on a dime during those years!

Betty Oetting

9:57 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Also, when we moved here in 2006, the people moving into north Mill Creek were told the Mill Creek was full, and a separate bus went around and picked up those kids and brought them to Western. That didn't involve us but maybe someone could speak to that experience?

Reply

dan

10:02 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

LETS TALK MONEY:
Add up the cost of a couple school buses to pull a few kids away from the 2 over populated kindergarten classes and send them to a different school. Add the cost of leasing at least 2 more buses, the cost of maintenance, cost of fuel, cost of equipping it with a camera system, the cost of a driver. How much more does it cost to hire 1 teacher who teaches 2 sessions of half-day kindergarten for a year?

The people who comment about how their kids move city to city and switch schools all the time, sounds like it was their choice to do so.

The district is not rezoning and sending a SECTION of kids to a further away school. I understand and accept that is a difficult decision that has to be made from time to time. What I have an issue with is the following. ONE OF THE PROPOSALS WILL HAVE MY ONE CHILD WHO LIVES A COUPLE BLOCKS FROM THE SCHOOL, NO ONE ELSE AROUND US, BUSED TO A FURTHER AWAY SCHOOL. Are there really people out there who think is acceptable?

Reply

Avett Green

11:04 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

If you're speaking about me, dan, please reread my comments. Those moves were dictated by my husband's career, not our choices.

Reply

Sabine Falco

11:21 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The only time a career isn't a choice is during a draft. I believe the last draft was Vietnam.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dan

11:38 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sabine...

I was going to go into detailed response to Rhonda about how my wife & I made a CHOICE and a huge sacrifice for one of us to quit our job and stay home with our kids as infants and toddlers. I was going to post about how I made a CHOICE to pass up a relocation job and other jobs with travel involved to avoid moving our kids constantly.

I think you summed it up better. Thanks

Noel G. Rooks

10:44 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I think rezoning is the answer. Obviously the numbers from the last survey didn't pan out, whether by deceit (as some claim) or just a change in circumstance (Crossings of La Fox never got built, etc.). Regardless, sending a select group of kids elsewhere for a year doesn't fix the issue. In today's NCLB world, Kindergarten isn't "milk and cookies" as some older folks remember, it is basically first grade, with reading, writing and math. 304 does a whole lot in those 2.5 hours, my youngest just completed kindergarten and I am impressed as to what he learned. Can the teacher do that with 28 in a class? Even with an aide? I don't know. 304 is obviously going through some growing pains here. I think the best solution is to implement the 2 half time positions, and do a boundary review in 2012-2013. It's too late to do one for this year, and bussing select kids makes no sense. We built the new school based on certain asumptions, they haven't held true, now we have to fix it. While my family isn't directly affected by this latest issue, in the 6 years we have lived here, our neighborhood has been zoned to 3 different schools. I can appreciate that kids are resilient, switching schools when moving is one thing, but switching schools while living in the same house is counterintuitive at best.

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

10:10 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

With what funds can 2 half time positions be instituted? We are 321 MILLION in DEBT. St. Charles School District has a procedure in place if the population exceeds the contractual agreement and that is the child will be relocated to another school. Throwing money at every issue to solve a problem always seem to be the answer here in Geneva. Please remember there are no FUNDS=no money that is the reality and is not an option.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

12:53 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

The Settlements of LaFox did not come into play when the decision was made to build Fabyan Elementary. Fabyan was for the build out of Mill Creek. Settlements of LaFox was going to have their own "neighborhood school."
It was stated at the board meeting that these sections already have a teacher and an aide. Many of the recently hired aides are certified teachers, so in reality you have two teachers not one. The administration needs to show the enrollment of every section in every school and if there is an aide or not in the classroom. Because of daycare, kindergarten has clearly changed from milk & cookies to a somewhat learning experience. But it still isn't 1st grade. If the children are able and willing to learn in kindergarten, 2 people (possibly 2 certified teachers) in a classroom of 28 - 30 should be enough. Add some parent help on a volunteer basis and these children should be ready for 1st grade.
As I told my son years ago when he wasn't selected for a travel soccer team, if this is the worst thing that ever happens to you, you'll be just fine. If a 5 year old is in a kindergarten class of 28 - 30 kids it will not be the worst thing that ever happens to them and will not destroy the rest of their school experience. Unless of course the parent makes it their worst experience. The board seems to have grasped that we are in tough financial times, the administration needs to think outside the box instead of increasing expenses for a one year period.

Avett Green

10:46 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Dan and Sabine:
The original comment I posted about childrens' abilities to adapt has apparently escaped you. I know you don't want to hear it because your kids are your babies. I felt the same way about my kids and still do. However, you've taken a different path about my comments that you know nothing about and are judging me for it. It's too frustrating working with amateurs, so have a good day. Over and out.

Reply

Geneva resident

8:57 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Bob McQuillan:

I live in Randall Square as well and have a kindergartener enrolled at Willaimsburg for the fall. So happy to hear that you aren't for plucking students out of neighborhoods and sending them to different schools. However, I received a letter in the mail asking if I would be willing to bus my child to Heartland or Western. They are asking for volunteers. All because they don't want to add back in a fourth ( part time teacher) class, which they've had for years past until enrollment was down last year. And they are scared to spend a dime because of your taxFacts group. Parents are more than concerned in this neighborhood and we are going to take a stand. Would you like to come over on the first morning of school, and explain to my five year old why he can't get on the bus with his friends and neighbors? Would you like to explain to him why he has to get on a bus alone and attend a school he's never stepped foot into with teachers he's never met? I was told he is high on that list because he doesn't have older siblings at Williamsburg. Great work, taxFacts!

Reply

Martina Natoma

9:20 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Interesting that we hand out the equivalent of two teachers salaries (150k last I looked) to people just before they retire (to boost their unfunded pension) and yet we haggle over the cost of hiring a few teachers to reduce class size. There is more than enough money coming into Geneva 304 to promote small class sizes, but the spending priorities are those promoted by the self serving teachers union, and not those desired by parents.

Reply

Amy H

9:39 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

Martina,

We're not even talking about hiring new bodies. This issue would require having two kindergarten teachers (one at Mill Creek and one at Willaimsburg) work a full day instead of half of a day.

Reply

John Doe

2:23 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012

Well Said, Geneva Resident and Amy H. This essentially alienates children at a crucial age and puts an unfair burden on families.

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how