Geneva
Current Weather
- Today
- 62°
- Local every day in
It's time to stand up to conservative bullies, and it can start with the arrest of the parent who disrupted a Mill Creek kindergarten class in a dispute over the Pledge of Allegiance.
When I read about last week’s Mill Creek Elementary School incident, I desperately wanted to chalk it up to an extreme example of conservatism run amok, but I couldn’t.
You see, the sad truth is, when a plurality of Americans insist upon shrieking socialism, birth certificate, secession, and taking back our country, a parent verbally assaulting a kindergarten class blends right in.
And please don’t try and tell me that the left is just as bad, because they aren’t. Yes! There are real conservatives who refuse to regularly succumb to that uncontrollable urge to control other peoples’ lives, but their capacity to ignore and even subtly encourage their bitter and overzealous brethren is unparalleled.
Incensed over a perceived Pledge of Allegiance omission of the word “liberty,” Colin McGroarty of Rockford launched into a four-letter-word tirade in front of his child’s kindergarten class. Then he left the premises before the sheriff’s deputies arrived.
Still unhappy, McGroarty sent Mill Creek administrators an email threatening, “I've shed blood for this Country and will do so again if necessary,” and, “I'm NOT ALLOWING you to introduce a Nazi way of life into the USA.”
Where’ve we heard that last line before?
For goodness sakes, it's kindergarten! I’m pleasantly surprised whenever any 5-year-old can find his or her left hand, much less regurgitate the Pledge. In third grade I clearly remember wondering who "Richard Stands" was. As in, “and to the Republic for Richard Stands.”
Folks, this is what the conservative movement has become: a group of screeching, paranoid, bigoted, gun-addicted, homophobic, intolerant, terrified and obliviously self-important people who see every cloud as a threat to their sad and stilted existence.
Ain’t it amazing that so many people seem to be out to get them?
And the problems really start when they’re forced to endure self-induced setback after setback and they start running out of excuses and targets. With nowhere left to turn, these neo-McCarthyiasts start seeing fascism in everything from Disney movies to, yes, kindergarten classes.
When all else fails, you call ‘em Nazis. This is the kind of thing that happens when a morally bankrupt movement is on the brink of imploding.
And this absurd self-defeating behavior is why, despite a miserable economy, the president prevailed in an Electoral College landslide. It’s why Illinois Republicans went down in General Election flames at the hands of Democrats who insist on driving the state into insolvency and raising taxes.
McGroarty also threw a hissy fit when the class went right from the Pledge into the school creed. And those principles consist of promising to treat others with respect, follow classroom rules, and do their best.
The horror!
The general innocuousness of that endeavor didn’t stop this irate parent from comparing it to Hitler Youth indoctrination. Ah yes! “Indoctrination!” The clarion call of the conservative who encounters anyone or anything that doesn’t conform to his narrow and hypocritical world view.
Ironically, couldn’t it be said that kindergartners reciting a Pledge they don’t even begin to understand is the very same thing?
And shame on District 304 and Mill Creek School, too. We so desperately want to believe school shootings are random, outside events that we get all wrapped up in complicated security schemes while ignoring the simpler and more effective countermeasures.
These threats almost always come from within. So like most savvy employers would’ve done, a quick glance at McGroarty’s blatantly open Facebook page would’ve revealed he’s the last person who should be volunteering at any school.
The wingnuts are never shy about sharing their viewpoint.
But back to the issue at hand. It’s time to stand up to “conservatives” who, under the guise of patriotism, attempt to hold others to a standard they don’t begin to apply to themselves and use it as a weapon to assert their will upon the rest of us.
As far as this particular case, though I don’t generally encourage prosecutors to engage in message sending, this time I’ll make an exception.
Considering the often-tragic consequences of school violence, not only am I asking the Kane County State’s Attorney to prosecute this man, but I’m thinking a six-months jail term might just send the kind of message that will prevent the next self-appointed conservative savior of our children from considering a similar course of action.
And if he is charged, just watch him fold like a cheap suit. Like most conservative bullies and blowhards, folks like McGroarty can’t stand the thought of having to take responsibility for their actions.
Martha Hanna
7:51 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Yes it is time for the "wingnuts" to shut their traps. If we are lucky, we live into our 80's. Life is too short, stop being negative. Republicans continually want to de-fund education and mental health. Listen to what Colin Powell said on Sunday...he wants his republican party back!! All this visciousness came out of the USA electing a black man for president. Keep McGrarty away from the schools and make sure his picture is posted in the office of the schools, this man is angry and he could snap at anytime. Also we should run public service ads educating people that if they own guns they should lock them up and keep them away from their children. I remember when I was a kid a public service announcement was made for curfew...it would say something like "It's 10:30pm, Do you know where your children are?" We the people need to educate the wingnuts like this angry man Mr. McGratry.
Thomas Kibort
11:16 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
Martha, if one wants to place the blame for cutting education and mental health funding in the failed State of Illinois, one need not look any further than to the modern day 3 Stooges, Chicago Democrats Pat Quinn, Michael Madigan and John Cullerton.
And your obviously race baiting and naive statement about the election of Barack Obama is without merit and quite pathetic.
John Perdikus
8:08 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
(720 ILCS 5/26-1) (from Ch. 38, par. 26-1)
Sec. 26-1. Disorderly conduct.
(a) A person commits disorderly conduct when he or she knowingly:
(1) Does any act in such unreasonable manner as to
alarm or disturb another and to provoke a breach of the peace;
Seems pretty simple to me.
NOYB
8:28 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Thanks John for being the first one to cite a statute. He should have been cuffed and removed from the building. Could you imagine if he'd gone into a courthouse and gone off like he did? Game over, he'd have been removed in a heartbeat in cuffs. Why is it different in a school? The message should have been sent on that day -- you can't verbally "go off" on a group of young children and get away with it. Um, and how about the exception of incitement to the freedom of speech??? Incitement
The Supreme Court has held that "advocacy of the use of force" is unprotected when it is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action" and is "likely to incite or produce such action".[1][2] In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Court struck down a criminal conviction of a Ku Klux Klan group for "advocating ... violence ... as a means of accomplishing political reform" because their statements at a rally did not express an immediate, or imminent intent to do violence.[3] This rule amended a previous decision of the Court, in Schenck v. United States (1919), which simply decided that a "clear and present danger" could justify a congressional rule limiting speech. The primary distinction is that the latter test does not criminalize "mere advocacy".[4]
NOYB
8:10 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Background checks should ABSOLUTELY be done on any parent or anyone working with children. The fact that doesn't happen is always shocking to me. Not just for situations like this, but um, if you look at the stories of child molesters MOST did anything they could to be near children -- even their own child's classmates, teammates, etc. The assumption of, "Oh, his/her child is a student, they must be okay to be here" absolutely needs to be challenged. I also don't believe parents really need to be in schools. I'm a parent volunteer from time to time but mostly so my kids don't ask, "Why don't you ever come to my school like all the other parents." When I went to elementary school in the 70s and early 80s I cannot remember any parents ever being in the school. And that was okay with everyone. It was a very successful school on all levels and kids never asked their parents "Why don't you ever come to my school." Why? Because it pretty much wasn't an option! It wasn't for safety then, as I'm pretty sure our doors were wide-open and anyone could enter at any time. It was because both the kids and the teachers were doing their jobs. Some parents are at school so much they don't need parent/teacher conferences. They already know just how Susie is doing. Catholic schools now do background checks for parents (yes, it's to look out for child predators after that sordid history). Public schools need to do so as well or eliminate parent volunteers.
JC
3:09 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Background checks are state law to volunteer at the schools in Illinois.
R G
8:15 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
You are doing the very thing this column complains about. Why are you so against Bible believing, gun owning, responsible citizens? While the place was wrong for him to say what he did, he has the right to do so. Just as you have the right to spew your hatred. People who hold to your ideology will reap the consequences.
You talk about Illinois loving Obama. Hmm, maybe that is because the food stamp rolls are the highest they have ever been. We have a huge number of illegal aliens. Do you think the bill to give them all drivers licenses plays into that? Good old Rahmy boy doesn't want to let a good crisis go to waste. Or what about that thorn in the side to everyone, Obamacare? Do you think people on food stamps and those here illegally wouldn't want that too? These are the people who voted for Obama, not the responsible people who actually enjoy their freedoms, and think for themselves. That is the key, they think for themselves. America was built on free thinking people's backs.
Sorry for you, that in third grade you still didn't know the words to the Pledge of Allegiance. That is the perfect argument against these schools, they cannot even teach the kids the correct words to say. How can we expect they will teach our children anything else. What were your parents doing?
J. C.
8:55 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I doubt Jesus would be pro-gun. Jesus loves the poor! Jesus fed the poor and gave people free healthcare! Jesus would never deport anyone. Jesus also loved little kids and I doubt he would be happy with someone taking his father's name in vain in front of them. Clearly, you read some weird evil bible.
Kate Oakley
8:20 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
He. Said. NOTHING. Against. Those. Who. Believe. In. The. Bible.
Nada. Zip. Zero.
Nor did he say anything about Food Stamps, or illegal aliens, or Rahm Emanuel, or ObamaCare. Why drag all that other stuff in? It has nothing to do with the conversation at hand. Why the need to stir things up and create conflict where there is none?
I am also a "Bible believing, gun owning, responsible citizen" - but I don't feel threatened by this post at all. WHY? Because my Bible doesn't teach intolerance or spite.
Perhaps you need to return to 3rd grade - to improve your reading comprehension.
MaryfromIL
11:26 pm on Sunday, January 20, 2013
WWJS .... Who Would Jesus Shoot?
Yet more conservative attacks on half the country, not backed up by any facts.
Jeff Ward
7:23 am on Monday, January 21, 2013
Mary,
LOL!
Jeff
Lisa Hall Offutt
8:30 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
"While the place was wrong for him to say what he did, he has the right to do so."
No, he does not. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you get to say anything you want to anywhere you want to. No one has the "right" to launch into a tirade in front of a class of kindergarteners inside an elementary school. If he were a "responsible citizen", he would have asked for a meeting with the principal or addressed a meeting of the school board about his concerns. He has no right to harangue the kindergarteners about it.
NOYB
8:34 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Yes, Lisa, you're right. I posted about the exception of "incitement" above. In light of today's climate of school violence, his "free speech" tirade absolutely falls into the incitement category. Speaking that way to children has also got to also be somehow endangering a child/children under some other statutes.
Ken Schuman
8:48 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
While I disagree with most of your commentary, I was very surprised that he wasn't arrested.
Kate Oakley
3:28 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I will tell you why he was not arrested: preferential treatment.
He is an uncle and a Godfather to at least 2 Nothnagel children... figure it out.
Sherry
8:56 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Seriously, maybe this McGroarty isn't a very good writer. When I read his comment I thought he was stating he was willing to re-enlist or go out and serve in the military again which may include shedding blood, because he was trying to show how strongly he felt about his country. And isn't the pledge given over the intercom? Surely it wasn't the kindergarten class that left it out, but perhaps the child over the intercom whose turn it was to lead the school in the pledge. I don't agree with his reaction, but your reaction? Throw him in jail for exercising his right for freedom of speech? You sound crazier than him. You wrote a long article using this man as a way to attack all conservatives. Shame on you! I don't think you should go to jail for it though. ;)
Jeff Ward
9:41 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Sherry,
You have a right to your interpretion, but most of the folks who've commented on this column and the news reports saw it as a threat - as I did.
People have been arrested for far less.
Jeff
Kate Oakley
3:32 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
In the morning, the whole school recites the Pledge of Allegiance and the school's creed together while an office staff person says them over the intercom.
For the afternoon kindergarten classes, it is not said over the intercom, just in those classrooms.
Sherry
4:04 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Jeff, I did not know it was afternoon class, nor did I know he was "spouting off and throwing a fit in the classroom" I didn't read that in the Patch, that came from the comments. (witnesses?) Perhaps he is dangerous. I believe & trust the authorities to handle this appropriately in light of recent events.Their reported response seems appropriate. I seem to recall reading in the Patch that a neighbor talked to him & felt the guy over reacted but didn't mean any harm. To be safe, I'm sure the authorities will investigate. The Patch comments sound like a mob mentality. Crucifying a citizen in the paper and using his situation as a platform for tearing down conservatives is wrong. What if he has a mental situation due to his military service? Should the article be a platform for getting GI's and others the mental healthcare they need instead? The Mob always judges too quickly without all the facts. Wait it out is all I'm saying.
Rudy
6:26 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Jeff most people that comment on your articles think you are less than balanced does that make it true? I am not defending Colin or his actions I just don't think he was threatening in the E-mail. I agree with Sherry.
Martha Hanna
9:08 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
The man should have been arrested and he should not be allowed anywhere near a school. He is an adult, he should have voiced his concerns to the principal...if he were drunk he would have been arrested. Parents need to try to act like adults in front of their children, and that goes for the soccer and football field too!
Lou Pierce
2:36 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Martha, if he were black -- or suspected of being an undocumented alien -- he would have been arrested, too. Anyone who scoffs at that comment should look at the racel/ethnicity of the people populating our overcrowded prisons for the grievous sin of possessing small amounts of marijuana. If that isn't enough, also compare the race/ethnicity of the people "caught" but not prosecuted or convicted. The disparity is shocking. As an older white man, I stand little chance of being caught, prosecuted and/or convicted (and we're ignoring the little nicety that I don't do "weed").
NOYB
9:10 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Sherry -- it was afternoon K. It was probably just those classes. And, freedom of speech is all about context and place. You cannot go into government buildings to spout such things and likewise in today's climate of school violence, you cannot go spouting off in front of a group of 5 year olds in a building where they are to be safe and learning. It was very scary for those young children to see a man act that way and use language like that to their teacher. It shouldn't have happened.
Jack
8:14 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
What language?
Where is there a verbatim report, or is everyone making assumptions?
NOYB
9:12 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Sherry -- drunk people in a mall disrupting the peace are taken away. (i.e., for much less than this). ????
George H. Scheetz
9:14 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
While I do not agree with his behavior, or his methodology, I believe that he was correct in protesting the addendum to the Pledge of Allegiance, which should stand on its own.
Jeff Ward
9:39 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
George,
I will defend your or anyone's right to protest until my dying breath, but there is an appropriate time, method and manner of making that protest.
Jeff
No more taxes
9:26 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Being a jerk isn't against the law. Having crazy ideas isn't against the law. He threw a fit in a school and wrote a crazy email. Arrest? Not sure for what unless it really is deemed threatening. We can't force him to change his opinions, such a country isn't what we want. Too many other nutty people out there share his same opinions so that he gets encouragement from others. Should they ban him from the school? Of course. Will they? Not sure. Should he apologize? Of course. Will he? Not sure. He does not yet see that his behavior, beliefs and acrimony towards his ex and society may cost him access to his children. The courts will look at this incident and his online postings and make a determination in the best interests of the children. Of course how he behaves in court and communicates with the judge matter too. I do not know him other than from this incident and reading his postings.
He did say on his site that he would never harm kids. Will hope that is true. Maybe court ordered counseling will help. We do have a problem in that we can't arrest people before they do something. Thinking they might is not probable cause. Could he go nuts and start something at the school? Possibly. Based on what others sometimes do is they takes their kids and run, hurt themselves and their kids or take it out on the ex. Hope he loves his kids and won't hurt them or their Mom. With an order of protection take away his guns? Hope that is possible.
Ellen Nottke
9:38 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Jeff, I don't usually give you the pleasure of responding to your diatribes, but I have to this time. Who was it again that you supported for County Board Chairman????
Jeff Ward
1:13 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
The winner.
NOYB
9:45 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
And, like it or not, you have to take the person and their actions in the totality of the circumstances. Here the totality includes a nasty custody battle and divorce and a history of extremist views. Let's call a spade a spade -- people with less than that going on in their lives have snapped, and the failure to recognize how inciteful his actions were the other day is a signal to many that further irrational behavior is possible.
NOYB
9:50 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Mr. McGroarty just issued a public apology on his open FB page.
Jeff Ward
1:53 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
That was no apology. McGroarty took no responsibility for his in-school actions. All he did was blame the school for goading him into an outburst.
He essentially said it was the school's fault for the leaving the pledge/creed reciting open to interpretation and it was the principal's fault for not dropping everything and speaking with him immediately!
Pray for his children people!
Jeff
Colin C.
10:20 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
If the report of Mr. McGroarty's actions in the Mill Creek School are at all accurate I think that it should be obvious that he frightened and confused group of children. That is, by definition, doing harm. The school and the parents are now left with the task of trying to remediate that.
Make no mistake, children of that age can be harmed by all sorts of inappropriate adult behavior. The consequences may not be immediately obvious but I think that it is reasonable to believe that this man's actions had a negative impact on some very young and impressionable minds.
I just hope and pray that all this will pass by and end peaceably and that no lasting damage was done.
KEK
10:33 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
As the parent of a student at Mill Creek, I too felt he should have been arrested. I had my kids recite the pledge the day after the "incident" and they did it perfectly. I did not teach them the pledge, MCES did! MCES has not changed one word in the pledge. Has anyone ever listened to 5-6 year olds recite anything? They make mistakes, don't say it in unison and can be difficult to understand. He should have behaved like an adult and asked to speak to the principal and if he didn't get a satisfactory response, move up the chain of command! There is no excuse for what he did! Did anyone notice on his FB page he didn't even say the pledge correctly!
Terry Flanagan
12:42 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
This is exactly how individuals living on the edge slip through the cracks. Assuming this individual has no criminal record he could easily purchase a weapon. Knowing what you know about this incident, would you feel comfortable selling this person a gun? We talk about the problems of mental health and gun violence, yet we have no real solutions to the problem. Behavior, such as uncontrollable rage, in a kindergarten class no less, is chalked up to an exercise of free speech instead of evidence for the need of some kind of intervention. We might do better by charging someone with disorderly conduct or assault in these instances and then having the courts require psychiatric evaluation and treatment in lieu of a jail sentence or fine. I don't think we do the individual or society any good by just ignoring the problem or by trying to justify the person's actions. The real danger to life and liberty is not some kindergarten pledge, but rather the acceptance of violent reactions to situations as the price of maintaining our freedom.
Jeff Ward
12:54 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Terry,
You are spot on! The problem is too many conservatives take a throw away the key approach and he social service aspect of law enforcement always gets cut first. Sometimes jail is the only option despite the fact that Kane County's drug court does some amazing things by address the person and not the bigger issue.
And your last sentence is perfect.
Jeff
Colin C.
1:02 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Terry, sorry, but I was hesitant to say this. Since you have opened the subject however:
After every one of these mass shootings the reports have indicated that the shooter demonstrated signs of personal turmoil and inappropriate behaviors that were either "missed" or "ignored". The implication has always been that someone should have picked up on that and done something to prevent the final act of defiance/retribution/ anger or whatever one wishes to call those horrible explosions that resulted in the deaths of so many innocent people.
Avett Green
3:16 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Amen!
EnoughAlready
8:46 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Terry
Thank you for your well thought out and insightful comment. I truly hope someone in authority (school district, law enforcement, etc) considers the consequences of not addressing your concerns...our children's safety.
klr
12:49 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Can't we leave politics out of this? I can't believe some of you are defending his "right" to do this in a public school classroom filled with young children. Shall we allow anyone to parade through our classrooms and rant about anything they like?
At the very least, ALL volunteers (including parents) should have a background check and complete a class in appropriate behavior around children.
Jim Radecki
1:00 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Unfortunately this persons conduct had nothing to do with how the pledge was recited.
Flow
2:08 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
He could have been arrested if he was asked to leave and did not. He certainly should have been asked. If he was asked and did leave I don't see what the basis would be for an arrest. I did not read his subsequent written comments as threatening violence but as stating that he had served before and would serve again. So on that point I guess I am in the minority but sorry Jeff, being in the minority does not mean I am wrong and your are right on the interpretation. It means that it is subject to interpretation and reasonable people can disagree.
Also, being free to say something does not mean being free from the consequences of having said it. If you want to test this, next time you are in the security line at the airport joke about a bomb - or tell a teacher in clear language that if they don't do what you want you will hurt them.
Avett Green
3:21 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Jeff Ward stated in his article that Mr. McGroarty left the school before sheriff deputies arrived.
Ann
2:58 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
As a parent of children that attend MCES I would be satisfied to see legal action taken against this parent and I'm trusting that the Kane County State's Attorney will do what they can. But what bothers me most is the speculation and untruths put out there in the public by people who were in no way involved in the situation. I know we all think we know the ins and out of the story because we have read every word on his Facebook page does that really mean you know the truth? MCES wants to nothing more to continue to provide a safe setting for our students to learn and become successful students. We also want to stop being the center of prying eyes, speculation and gossip. We all know that this is an unfortunate situation and at the center of this situation is innocent children. So instead of continuing to make judgments, furthering the gossip mill, how about we get back to our own lives and leave the professionals to handle the situation.
Jeannie Cormier Scown
3:01 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I am not sure the term "conservative" fits this individual. As much as I have argument with "conservatives" this person seems troubled and stressed. Keeping an eye out for him might be a good thing. Asking him if he needs help, might even be better.
NOYB
4:09 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Sherry sometimes it's not a mob mentality but rather reasonable majority prevailing. A majority is not always a mob. Sometimes it's a the mark of what is reasonable. It's how juries work, elections work, and how our legislative process works. He's not being "convicted" for his "ideas" but rather the manner in which he went about it. Even he has recognized his errors in that regard.
Kate Oakley
4:35 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Anybody who questions this guys thought processes needs to read his very public - still! - Facebook page.
Please note a picture of a newspaper clipping posted in his "Photos" in 2011 - I believe he has an extended relation that works in high places... in Kane County government...
Dave
5:18 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
"Folks, this is what the conservative movement has become: a group of screeching, paranoid, bigoted, gun-addicted, homophobic, intolerant, terrified and obliviously self-important people who see every cloud as a threat to their sad and stilted existence."
Gee, painting with a pretty broad brush aren't you? Aside from the "gun-addicted and homophobic" part of your rant, I thought it sounded like you were describing the liberal movement.
patchedin
5:25 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
This incident shouldn't be about right v. left. As an American who believes in the Constitution, I believe that it is everyone's right to believe and say what they want as long as it doesn't cause any harm. A person's right to liberty is only curtailed when it infringes on the liberty of others. The issue in this case is not what this man believes but how he went about expressing himself. He did it in an inappropriate manner, end of story. What he believes is his business. If you disagree with it or agree with it, show your feelings in the polls. Absolutely, express your opinions to each other in a respectful manner. But don't make this into something it isn't. As a parent, I am very disturbed by the incident, but I am not concerned about his beliefs. It doesn't change anything for me or how I raise my kids. He has a right to his opinions, just like I have a right to mine. One of the greatest things about this country is that we have that right. Stop obsessing about this man's beliefs. It's his right to have them and your right to disagree or agree with them. It is highly unlikely that anyone is going to change anyone else's beliefs and gain supporters by haranguing and personal attacks. He should be charged with disorderly conduct for his behavior and not his beliefs. Let the police determine if he is more of threat than simply using very bad judgment and having poor impulse control. Speculation without information does way more harm than good.
No more taxes
5:50 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
He did just apologize. Not sure how many mass murderers would do that. The Facebook page is a sign of how he thinks, his personal life is not in a good place with a divorce. Is there anyone that knows him and can vouch that he is stable?? Facebook friends that agree with his crazy ideas don't count:) What I don't think he realizes is that it is his actions plus the letter were bad, then when people review his site they get real scared and question his sanity. Too much survivalist, weapons, and conspiracy theory stuff makes one wonder. If you say control population he'll think genocide, no machine guns may mean no guns at all and no way to combat the government, government is going to take away all of our freedom.... a person can be well read and recite a whole bunch of books/facts but can still reach some crazy conclusions. He thinks kids say the Pledge wrong and it is the State indoctrinating our children for nefarious reasons and the start of the end of the free United States...
klr
8:28 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I was feeling bad for him and feeling like this was perhaps blown out of proportion, but I just looked over his FB page. He has irrational and intense fear (well before the incident in the classroom) and is certainly not someone you want influencing your children. Now I'm the one afraid of him: https://www.facebook.com/cmmcgroarty
I would really like the Republican party back, please. Fox news and right wing extremists are scaring the daylights out of people. Enough.
Avett Green
9:36 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
His Facebook page content is very intense and one-dimensional. Approximately 280 photos of just the St. Charles Memorial Day parade.........
klr
8:31 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
...and seriously? This was included in his "apology":
I’d also like to clarify that the “disturbance” where I told the children they shouldn’t promise to follow rules when they don’t know what the rules are and to ask their parents about the Nazis and why this lesson is important, did NOT include any profanity.
Jeff Ward
8:31 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
KLR,
That last paragraph is music to my ears!
Jeff
Justin Eggar
10:34 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
Some valid points if it wasn't also spewing political nonsense. Don't worry Jeff... One day everybody will learn better and have the same opinion as you.
1. McGoarty likely should have been arrested if his actions were deemed threatening. We don't need that in our schools. (Granted, it's difficult to know what exactly was said and what context it was said in). We should likely give our teachers enough room to make a little bit of a judgement call. Certainly enough to call the police if a situation develops.
2. Conservatives certainly don't agree with an adult frightening or cussing in front of children. Suggesting otherwise is delusional and self serving.
3. Switch it up Jeff - give us something fun rather than the same tune blog after blog. People want to like you... But it's like the one-dimensional soap opera that never develops. Throw a little bit of enlightened Jeff 2.0 out there.
Beth
12:28 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Jeff, as usual, I loved the article and your willingness to lay it all out there! I also have children at MCES and am very concerned about this man's views and actions. I'm glad the district acted aggressively. I also agree that Martha, NOYB, J.C., Terry and klr made some great points, specifically the one most pertinent to the issue..background checks for volunteers. Some parents are in the school every day (which is more often than some employees are there) yet there are thorough criminal background checks done on all employees but not volunteers. It always surprised me, but now it concerns me. I also feel bad for his children. Hopefully, they are not being treated badly by their classmates because of something that is out of their control.
Ray B
12:40 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Typical paranoid, psychopathic, burned to the bone that there is a black Democrat (read "socialist") President, who, coincidentally, has a "Muslim" name. His children suffer, his community suffers, and all he needs to do is take his medication, see a therapist, and stop wasting his time w/ Fox News, Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh & the like, who only exist to feed on & exploit said paranoia
Ray B
12:41 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
“Colin says that god is important to him. He also says that people should not just blindly follow authority. He needs to make up his mind.”
Ray B
12:53 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
They're kindergarteners. If you asked, I bet half of them think "4 witches stand" is in the pledge. Also, "invisible".
And some might say I pledge allegiance to the flag, and to the republic for Richard Stands.”
And others may say "with liberty and justice for owls"
and those that just want to end the pledge say "with liberty and that's just all".
C'mon Colin, wise up.
Matilda B
6:59 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Thank you for saying what needed to be said. I greatly appreciate it. And I also thank those who have constructively responded. Jeff, you said it all
steve todd
12:14 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Jeff,
I agree with Sherry. I found your article extremist.
Are you now a liberal bully? ..put the guy in jail?
I think the police spoke to the guy, got the facts, and with the judicial system took the proper, cautionary response to keep the guy away from the school (no trespass order). They got the facts and acted, and I believe they took the correct action....I only say that because they did get all the facts, which we don't all have..
Also, Jeff, a plurality of Americans are not secessionist or extreme....more and more they're just sick of the Democrats and Republicans pulling the country apart. Did you write this article before your morning coffee or something?
Jeff Ward
12:51 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Steve,
Coffee? Can you imagine me on caffeine?
Jeff
JC
2:53 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Jeff,
You and Colin are the reason there are so many people registering as independents. you are both extreme and use bully tactics. Colin seems to use the constitution as a shield even if he does not really know what it says. you seem to hide behind your employer to protect you from danger. Colin took his stances and violated the very principles by reacting inappropriately in front of children, I believe it is safe to assume that at least a couple of the kids were frightened by his actions. this is against the law.
You print in an article that he "launched into a four-letter-word tirade in front of his child’s kindergarten class." This statement has not been validated by any source as there has been no report of profanity or vulgarity. This is defamation of character, which is also illegal. as the pot has now called the kettle black maybe both of you should become educated and stop being so radical that everyone only reads your writings for the humor found in your stupidity.
Jeff Fairchild
4:47 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
In the interest of discouraging “bitter and overzealous” bloggers, I feel compelled to post my agreement with Sherry, Dave, Justin, and Steve. Ward's column is extreme in its attempt to smear "conservatives" and evidences a potentially dangerous level of hatred towards those unfortunate enough to wear that political label in Jeff Ward’s view. Thank goodness this ranting column was presented in the Patch and not some kindergarten class. Somewhat tongue in cheek, I will state my hope that the police are present to protect the innocent if Ward ever approaches a school or other public space, glassy eyed and mumbling semi-coherent phrases about “screeching, paranoid, bigoted, gun-addicted, homophobic, intolerant, terrified and obliviously self-important” conservatives.
Jack
10:52 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013
I should have said that. It needed to be said. Thanks
juicebox
12:55 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
this man needs to be permanently banned from school property and if his ex wants to make her tro stick, i would support that also. this is no time to mess around with threats, dont be fooled by his poor excuse of an apology. i will not subject my children to any risk in their school not even 1 in a million.
juicebox
1:37 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
one more thing - the background check is a great idea. i bet most of us assumed it was done on all. i'd only suggest that an extensive background check be done now on the mcgroarty parent. ...and published for all parents to see
JC
5:27 am on Wednesday, January 16, 2013
I was under the impression that it is state law that all volunteers have to have a background check.
JCLK
8:48 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013
Wow! Guilty until proven innocent? One so called conservative defines all conservatives?
juicebox
11:58 am on Sunday, February 17, 2013
JEFF WARD's article is proof in the pudding identifying the problem as being America's division between left and right, blame, finger pointing, denial and open minded disgust. Those who need to link violence to politics are part of the problem. Jeff is doing that here. Although the pledge parent appears to be a far right political fundamentalist, the truth is, he is an end of his rope psychotic whom cannot be trusted with children or authority figures. He believes everyone is his enemy and he will do anything to justify his own irrational thoughts and behavior. Stay away from this man, keep our children away from this man, or we will be wondering why no one warned us, no one cautioned us... It's not political. It's Sandy Creek, Aurora, Colorado, Virginia Tech, NIU on and on and on... Psycho's everyone of them.