Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

Why Batavia's Pending Chick-fil-A Should Be a Non-Issue

Do we really have to go over this again?

 

Do we really have to go over this again? C’mon! I thought I’d already cleared the whole thing up in The Beacon and Courier-News. But no! Just because some insipid fast food CEO makes some sort of asinine statement, it apparently means we that have to reopen the entire can of worms.

And this time it was Chick-fil-A head honcho Dan Cathy who regurgitated the same old tired intolerant and bigoted bleep we’ve already heard a thousand times before. “Blah blah blah, gay marriage. Blah blah blah Bible, Blah blah blah God, Blah blah blah eternal damnation.”

The irony is that, not only does the Bible fail to define the concept of marriage, but it doesn’t mention anything about same-sex unions at all. But even if it did, ain’t it funny how some southern fried folks are all too eager to pick up on some of the prohibitions while completely ignoring a host of others.

For example, Leviticus 19:19 warns against the use of mixed fibers like polyester. I always thought wearing a leisure suit was a mortal sin.

We ignore biblical caveats against Beatle haircuts (Leviticus 19:27), astrology and tattoos (Leviticus 19:19), divorce, eating shellfish, and my all-time favorite, having your wife defend you from a male attacker by grabbing him by a rather delicate area (Deuteronomy 25:11-12)!

Quite frankly, any wife willing to go that far to defend my honor is certainly worth having around—especially if she’s got a firm grip.

When the Bible does discuss marriage, it gets kinda wacky, “When brothers live together and one of them dies and has no son, the wife of the deceased shall not be married outside the family to a strange man. Her husband's brother shall go in to her and take her to himself as wife and perform the duty of a husband's brother to her.” (Deuteronomy 25:5)

Kinky!

But the most delicious irony is the Good Book’s prohibition against touching a pig, much less eating pork. Thus, anyone who’s ever partaken of a Chick-fil-A chargrilled chicken club sandwich is going straight to hell.

Hey! Don’t blame me! I only report the rules; I don’t make ‘em. It’s just that if you’re gonna start reciting biblical verses, then you probably shouldn’t be picking and choosing.

All that said, I also want to be clear that, despite what some Democratic mayors seem to think, even morons like Mr. Cathy are covered by the First Amendment. Why he’d want to wade in on this kind of controversial topic completely baffles me, but it’s every American’s God-given right to say some of the stupidest things imaginable.

I just wish you all wouldn’t avail yourselves of that right quite as often as you do.

But banning Chick-fil-A from Chicago and Boston? Really? Louis Farrakhan is a bigoted lunatic, but Rahm Emanuel ain’t saying anything about his South Side presence.

So while I certainly wish conflicting intolerances would cancel each other out, banning fast food franchise isn’t the answer. Personally, I don’t plan on patronizing the impending Batavia location, for no other reason than they serve distressingly mediocre deep fried fare that does nothing more than make you fatter than you already are.

But when it comes to this kind of semi-accepted discrimination, here’s an interesting litmus test. What if, instead of disparaging same-sex wedlock, our absurd CEO came out against interracial marriage? Remember, it wasn’t that long ago that southern pastors cited the same Bible in an effort to ban that “unnatural” practice.

I’ll tell you what would happen—there would hell to pay. Every last restaurant would be picketed, there would be real calls for a boycott, and, to save the company, Cathy would immediately issue a mea culpa and embark upon the Oprah/Jesse Jackson reconciliation tour.

There certainly wouldn’t be a ridiculous Chick-fil-A appreciation day.

Ain’t it also funny how we can so easily look back on and decry that kind of abject discrimination, but we never seem to see it in ourselves.

To wit, in order to entice $10 contributions, Republican regulars are now offering a $5 Chick-fil-A coupon. But isn’t the GOP supposed to be the party of less government? And isn’t inserting your nose into other people’s bedrooms about as intrusive as it gets?

(For an alternate ending to this column please see my blog at www.thefirstward.net.)

Who cares what people do in the privacy of their own home and, when you really think about it, who cares what some silly CEO has to say about it? As I’ve said many times before, the mere thought of observing any of my portly, white, middle class, heterosexual neighbors engaged in a carnal embrace terrifies me so much more than same-sex weddings.

Do we really want to be on the wrong side of history on this one? Do we really want our grandchildren to read the news stories and say, “What were they thinking?”

Let’s let this one go and move onto more important things.

About this column: Jeff Ward is an opinion columnist who writes for Patch and his blog, The First Ward. He is the owner of Lapinator Incorporated and does part-time consulting for the Kane County Clerk's Office. Related Topics: Chick -fil-A, Chick-Fil-A, Jeff Ward, and Same Sex Marriage

Mr. Ed

6:41 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Come on......it is chicken! Just CHICKEN!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ignatius Reilly

12:29 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

It's not just chicken Ed, it's the ultimate battle between good and evil. Where you will be on the rapture when Jesus returns? On the end of days will you be those of us who have been saved at a Chick-fil-A receiving your entrance into the kingdom of heaven? Or will you spend eternity in you know where? You decide.

R G

6:45 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Mr Ward, you clearly disregard the Bible and what it says. You picked out some verses, but have no clue what their context is. Marriage- Genesis 2:20-24. Homosexuality (God despises it, by the way)- Romans 1:18-32 specifically verses 26 & 27.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

7:14 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

R G,

Then I hope you don't wear polyester either!

Jeff

Michele Schuman

7:48 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Wow, I thought the Geneva Patch was an alternative news source not a place for ranting blogs. Your article was not good journalism. Please take time to review your article before you post it and make sure you are making a point, not just rambling. Unless I am mistaken and Geneva Patch is not considered a news source.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Loblaw

1:31 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

It's not, except by maybe the people that write for it. There is very little if any credible or ethical work being done here.

Jane Sinclair

8:05 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Have you actually read the article that appeared in The Baptist Press? Mr. Cathy of Chik-Fil-A said he "supports the traditional family." Here is what he was quoted as saying in the July 16, 2012 article in The Baptist Press: "Some have opposed the company's support of the traditional family. "Well, guilty as charged," said Cathy when asked about the company's position.

"We are very much supportive of the family -- the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that.

"We operate as a family business ... our restaurants are typically led by families; some are single. We want to do anything we possibly can to strengthen families. We are very much committed to that," Cathy emphasized."

He never once made an anti-gay or lesbian remark. It is the goal of gays and lesbians to marry. That is a civil issue not a religious one. Take it up with your government.

The First Amendment reads “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The Chik-fil-a encounter was a great exercise showing the depth of the First Amendment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike

11:37 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Jane: well said!!. Don't expect those like Jeff Ward to actually read the truth and empathize with opposing viewpoints. Jeff ward is too busy Demonizing the Opposition with words like: "Insipid", "asinine","Intolerant","Bigoted", "Moron","stupid","Lunatic","Absurd","Ridiculous","Silly CEO" all Adjectives used in Jeff's column. Does anyone wonder why the Political environment is the way it is? Its the Likes of Jeff ward and His intolerance and name calling of those he disagrees that is making Political debate impossible. Its easier For Jeff ward to make his opposition "evil" than it is to educate oneself and have a reasonable disagreement. His column is an opinion piece, not an informed article.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

11:49 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Mike,

Could that be because I'm an opinion columnist?

Comment_arrow

Mike

11:55 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

and that's the most you will be.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

12:52 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

And if that's the case then I will die a very happy man!

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:26 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

The CEO supports and donates large amounts of money to organizations that are anti-gay, therefore passing the buck to try and stay out of the media. Ooops. I guess that isn't really working out. As far as the christian/anti-homosexuality hypocrisy, I have read and studied the bible more than most "anti-gay Christians" (and honestly more than anyone really should). Here is a link to a list of abominations. I am 1000% sure you have broken most of them... Here are some verses that Millions of people violate every day:

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:26 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

1. If you have ever thrown a football, Leviticus 11:8, which is discussing pigs, reads "You shall not eat of their flesh nor touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you.". -yep, you are unclean and hell bound! Even Tim Tebow!

2. Round haircuts. See you in Hell, Beatles... and/or kids with bowl cuts, surfer cuts or (my favorite) Beiber swoop cuts. Leviticus 19:27 reads "You shall not round off the side-growth of your heads nor harm the edges of your beard.". Some of you older guys I can guess lived in the 60s and 70s. -Yep, Hell.

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:27 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

3. Fortune telling. Before you call a 900 number (do people still call 900 numbers, by the way?), read your horoscope or crack open a fortune cookie, realize you're in huge trouble if you do. Leviticus 19:31 reads "Do not turn to mediums or spiritists; do not seek them out to be defiled by them. I am the Lord your God." The penalty for that? Check Leviticus 20:6: "As for the person who turns to mediums and to spiritists, to play the harlot after them, I will also set My face against that person and will cut him off from among his people." -I foresee hell in your future.

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:27 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

4. Masturbating or pulling out: It's Genesis 38:9-10: "Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so when he went in to his brother's wife, he wasted his seed on the ground in order not to give offspring to his brother. But what he did was displeasing in the sight of the Lord; so He took his life also." -Pretty sure you violate this one at lease once a day.

5. Tattoos. Yep-No tattoos. Leviticus 19:28 reads, "You shall not make any cuts in your body for the dead nor make any tattoo marks on yourselves: I am the Lord." Not even a little butterfly on your ankle. Or Thug Life across your abdomen. Or even, fittingly enough, a cross.

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:28 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

6. Polyester, or any other fabric blends. The Bible doesn't want you to wear polyester. Not just because it looks cheap. It's sinfully unnatural. Leviticus 19:19 reads, "You are to keep My statutes. You shall not breed together two kinds of your cattle; you shall not sow your field with two kinds of seed, nor wear a garment upon you of two kinds of material mixed together.". -That poly-blend shirt your wearing wont keep out the flames of hell.

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:29 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

7. Divorce. The Bible is very clear on this one: No divorcing. You can't do it. Because when you marry someone, according to Mark 10:8, you "are no longer two, but one flesh." And, Mark 10:9 reads, "What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate." Mark gets even more hardcore about it a few verses later, in Mark 10:11-12, "And He said to them, 'Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.'" -This just took out 78% if you.. In addition to finding that four out of every five adults (78%) have been married at least once, the Barna study revealed that an even higher proportion of born again Christians (84%) tie the knot. That eclipses the proportion among people aligned with non-Christian faiths (74%) and among atheists and agnostics (65%).

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:29 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

8. Letting people without testicles into church. Whether you've been castrated or lost one or two balls to cancer isn't important. The Bible doesn't get that specific. It just says you can't pray. Deuteronomy 23:1 reads (this is the God's Word translation, which spells it out better), "A man whose testicles are crushed or whose penis is cut off may never join the assembly of the Lord." Oh, and the next verse says that if you're a bastard, the child of a bastard... or even have a great-great-great-great-great-great-great-grandchild of a bastard, you can't come to church or synagogue either. Deuteronomy 23:2 reads, "No one of illegitimate birth shall enter the assembly of the Lord; none of his descendants, even to the tenth generation, shall enter the assembly of the Lord."

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:30 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

9. Wearing gold. 1 Timothy 2:9 doesn't like your gold necklace at all. Or your pearl necklace. Or any clothes you're wearing that you didn't get from Forever 21, Old Navy or H&M. "Likewise, I want women to adorn themselves with proper clothing, modestly and discreetly, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly garments.

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:30 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

10. Shellfish. Leviticus 11:10 reads, "But whatever is in the seas and in the rivers that does not have fins and scales among all the teeming life of the water, and among all the living creatures that are in the water, they are detestable things to you."

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:30 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

11. Your wife defending your life in a fight by grabbing your attacker's genitals. No joke. Deuteronomy actually devotes two verses to this exact scenario: Deuteronomy 25:11-12. "If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the wife of one comes near to deliver her husband from the hand of the one who is striking him, and puts out her hand and seizes his genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; you shall not show pity." That's impossible to misinterpret. Ladies, if your husband is getting mugged, make sure to kick the mugger in the pills. Do not do the grip and squeeze (no matter what "Miss Congeniality" might advise). Or your hand needs to be cut off.

Comment_arrow

EV Cannon

8:31 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

As a final note, I know that nine of these 11 cite the Old Testament (not including the widely christian spouted gay verse), which Christianity doesn't necessarily adhere to as law. Strictly speaking, the New Testament says nothing at all about homosexuality unless you are talking about Corinthians 6:9–10 that says that certain types of people “will not inherit the kingdom of God.” The list of such people begins with fornicators, idolaters, and adulterers, and it ends with thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, and robbers. Do you really want to split hairs on the word fornicator considering the greed of most churches these days? Come on...

To which I say: If you're going to ignore the section of Leviticus that bans about tattoos, pork, shellfish, round haircuts, polyester and football, how can you possibly turn around and quote Leviticus 18:22 ("You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination.") as irrefutable law?

Comment_arrow

Jane Sinclair

8:56 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

@EV Canon Your script from 8:26 PM to 8:31 PM...is this in response to me? If so, it's irrelevant to my remarks, but sounds like something you like to pull out (oh, and not as you referenced in Genesis 38: 9-10, to be clear!) every chance you get for shock value and not because it has any significance to a discussion. Meh...

Tom Brown

8:09 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

This is America...

He has the right to build stores anywhere zoning permits.

His contractors have the right to charge him double.

I have the right to never go there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeannie Cormier Scown

10:40 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Amen to that! Thanks to Jeff too!

Comment_arrow

Mike Bruno

11:22 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Thanks Tom Brown. That was a bulls-eye.

Ken Schuman

9:39 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

did i miss something? who asked you to write another article on this?

However, I do agree with your first amendment comment. Obviously morons are allowed to say what they want or else you would have to find another line of work.

Reply

Rob Brundige

9:53 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Bible says this and that and the religious right pick and choose what it says like a smorgasbord!
This isn't about the bible, it's about civil rights. If your church doesn't believe in same sex marriage, don't perform them.
Build a Chik-fil-A anywhere you want! I won't go there, but I rarely go to any of the fast food joints in the tri-cities.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Loblaw

1:33 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

It's too bad we'll never see that many "Christians" lined up to donate at their local food pantry.

Katherine Streit

10:13 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Jeff,

Well said. I really appreciated this column. Thank you!

Reply

Jeff Ward

10:18 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Katherine,

You're welcome!

Jeff

Reply

Brian Smith

10:41 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

While I have no rooster in the Chick-fil-a fight, I do believe those who bring disdain upon the Bible need to be called out in this life. Hopefully they will change before the next one.

Since you brought up the Bible, every serious Bible scholar (and apparently you claim to be one) knows that there is an old covenant that God made with Israel and a new covenant that fulfilled the old. One purpose of the old was to set the people of Israel apart as distinct from the surrounding pagan nations. With the coming of the new covenant, the laws that set Israel apart were abolished but any law that is moral in nature must remain because God's moral nature never changes. One way to know which laws are moral is to see what is repeated in the New Covenant. Here are some New Testament verses for your revernt study and next column Mr. Ward. And remember, your final grade will come from the one who wrote the laws, not just your bubble of like minded scoffers.

Matthew 19:3-5
Rom 1:26-27
1Co 6:9-11
1Ti 1:8-11

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

10:46 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Brian,

So what you're essentially saying is, the Bible is open to interpretation and it isn't the infallible moral imperative that so many self-righteous folks use to attack people who aren't like them.

Interesting!

Jeff

Comment_arrow

Jeannie Cormier Scown

10:54 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

And for you Matthew 7:3-5
Luke 6:42
I have no interest in carrying on a conversation with someone who desecrates the very loving nature of Jesus Christ.

OutSpoken1

10:55 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

WOW...... I don't think the moron was Mr. Cathy...... but could be that "Democratic mayor" for speaking on behalf of the city of Chicago. Who does he think he is??????

Reply

RAY

10:58 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Hope we are getting a Chicken-Fil-A here in Geneva and do not have to read stupid coments from the likes of Jeff Ward.

Ray

Reply

Brian Smith

10:59 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

Ummmm... well every piece of lituare must be interpreted, including your column. There are those who purposly misinterpret.
There are those whoes world view taints their interpretation (and yours comes through loud and clear).
And there really are those who try to objectively study the text in the original languages. All who do so try to be aware of their presuppositions and world views, but part of the goal of hermenutics is to set those presuppositions aside and get to what the author of the text really meant factoring in context, culture, canon, and history of interpretation. Jeff, can you honestly say you fall into this last group?

Reply

Ray Echer

11:02 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

It's not the idea that they don't support gay marriage, it's the fact Chick-fil-a has been giving money to anti-gay groups (Take that as you will, they are most likely some kind of groups that try to turn gays straight). People don't like that, but most people aren't going to care where their money goes. It's like the idea of buying "all-american", it can't be done. The food isn't the problem, the CEO isn't the problem, and there is no one else to blame other than the people who tried to force the news story on other people. We don't want to hear about it anymore, if you don't like the company, you don't have to buy from there.

There isn't even a Chick-fil-a within the area yet, and people are refusing to go there. I would definitely go there, because I don't care if a tiny percentage of my money goes to "bad groups". Might as well never buy anything at all, because we don't know where any of that money goes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Sinclair

4:12 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Ray Echer...Please name one anti-gay group Chik-Fil-A donates money or in-kind assets?

Comment_arrow

Bob Loblaw

1:37 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Among them is Exodus, a group that claims to "cure" gay people.

Comment_arrow

Jane Sinclair

11:01 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

To the person hiding behind "Bob Loblaw"....so crafty using "Among" to insinuate there are others. WRONG They have never given a penny to that organization. You obviously know nothing about Chik-fil-a and their charitable work, but why would you? The list of their charitable contributions exists...go find it. I did.

Comment_arrow

OutSpoken1

1:30 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012

So...... it's NOT OK to give to the "straight alliance" groups? Why is it OK to give to the "pro-gay/lesbian" groups? Who is deciding which group is "bad" and which is "good"?

Ignatius Reilly

11:08 am on Monday, August 6, 2012

A Chick-fil-A in Batavia! Sweet! Finally a place my family and I can go to enjoy artery clogging proccessed fast food without the fear of my children being converted by homosexuals.

Genesis 14: 6-8

"Then the lord giveth chicken, waffle-cut fires, and peach shakes to man, and it tasted awesome"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

12:48 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Ignatius,

I have to say, after I managed to stop laughing my ass off, I decided that this is officially my favorite Bible verse and I will strive to live by it for the rest of my days.

I've always wondered if the use of the word "friar" wasn't a misinterpretation of the Lord's true meaning.

Jeff

Jeannie Cormier Scown

12:23 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

jeff,
I think you do a great job, I was replying to Brian Smith's Bible rant. the log in the eye was not for you....Many of us are so tired of the Bible thumpers who make judgments for their god. There is so much hate in this world and in particular in the hearts of those that tout the Bible. How in the world can they say they are followers of their savior? Hate, segregation, judgment, and a closed mind are the very things he was persecuted for. They indeed have turned many of us away from their religions which is a huge sin in their sacred book.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

12:49 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Jeanine,

Gotcha! Thanks and sometimes it's hard to tell with these Patch comment threads.

Colin C.

12:29 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

I would like to recommend this article. I think that there are some excellent points here about issues that are a bit deeper than a chicken sandwich.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/conor-gaughan/chick-fil-a-homophobia_b_1711566.html?utm_hp_ref=tw&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000008

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Sinclair

4:24 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Colin...This article is the way to present a point of view. Not attacking someone or their business because it opposes yours. Mr Cathy has never spoken out about gays and lesbians. He has only spoken for traditional family and his Christian beliefs. Tolerance in this endless debate is definitely the solution. Live and let live. Thanks for sharing this article

Max

12:48 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Yes, Jeff, you are an "opinion" columnist. Not at all an informed-opinion columnist when it comes to biblical teaching, but that is your right as an American. Lucky you.

And thank you for being up-front about your disdain for Christianity. I'm sure you've been exposed to opportunities throughout your life to gain a clearer understanding of Bible teachings, so there'd be no point in my seeking to correct your gross misreadings of the Word.

There is one thing I think you ought to remember: when you seek to bolster your pre-conceptions by pointing out individual Christians' imperfections -- rather than focusing on the perfection of our Savior, you have missed the entire point.

I hope you do come to see the truth before it is too late.

Reply

Jeff Ward

12:51 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Max,

Though I appreciate your concern, it's way too late for me. As that great philosopher Billy Joel once sang, "I'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints, the sinners are much more fun!"

Jeff

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Drye

8:07 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

but you somehow feel that bashing Christians is having fun?
The saints cry for you.

Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

8:14 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Brian,

I'm not bashing Christians, I'm holding their feet to the fire!

I'm simply pointing out that you can't adhere to some biblical edicts and not others. And a convuloted argument to justify why you can exposes many Christians and legal positivist hypocrites.

Jeff

Max

12:58 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

"...inserting your nose into other people's bedrooms...?"

This is really where you think the issue lies, Jeff? If so, you'd better stick to School Board issues, or anything for which you can be intellectually as well as physically present.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

1:02 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Max,

Republican ain't a religion! So for the folks who shriek "less government" to chime in on same-sex marriage is an oxymoron of the highest degree.

As far as this issue, what would Jesus say about self-righteous individuals who think they know "the way?"

Jeff

Comment_arrow

Brian Drye

8:10 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Actually, oppossing same sex marriage is a "less government" stance. Marrriage is, and always has been a religious institution. If the government wants to allow same sex unions than that is the governments business.

Dab

1:00 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Much ado about nothing. I believe the majority owner of Caribou Coffee is the Bank of Islam. If that bothers you, buy your coffee at Starbucks.
If you don't like Chick-Fil-A's owner stance on gay marriage, don't buy the product.
Move on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Max

1:15 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

re Caribou Coffee: http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/caribou.asp

Once you've read this convoluted attempt by Snopes to clarify the Caribou/Sharia connection, at least you'll have a starting point. As for me, I will continue to avoid Caribou, as I have since the company's beginning, but now with even more justification.

Max

1:20 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

@Jeff

Republican + religion + government + sex = oxymoron.

What else have you got -- other than name-calling and mis-direction?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

2:59 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

A keen perception of the obvious!

J

1:39 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Personally I will never step foot in a place that openly donates to anti-gay charities. As one poster said if you dont want to support something you dont like dont shop anywhere. I found an article the other day from an employee that made me snicker. Its a closeted gay employee and their feelings on the whole issue at hand.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/02/a-gay-chick-fil-a-employee-speaks-out.html
The absolute best part of the article was this paragraph,,
"I remember thinking, under stress, “I hope they choke.” That’s not true. Even though I did my best to make the salads and wraps extra-gay, I don’t want to harm the customers. (Otherwise I may have been moved to spit on their food. I didn’t, because that’s going too far.) The only thing that kept me going without screaming or storming off was simply knowing that I’m right. These people won’t choke on their food—I wouldn’t wish that, just as I wouldn’t wish anyone go hungry—but they will end up hurting. It’s going to be a long fall from the saddles of their high horses, once we do have equal marriage rights. Their descendants will be ashamed of them, just as I’m ashamed of my grandparents’ support of segregation. When their children and grandchildren ask, “How was it possible to be Christian and oppose equal rights?” their own words will choke them. They don’t need food to do it for them."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jane Sinclair

4:07 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

J...Seriously? How much validity is there in an article written by "ANONYMOUS" and posted in THE DAILY BEAST. It's about as valid as someone posting under the name "J". I always like a good fairy tale.

And to quote you: "Personally I will never step foot in a place that openly donates to anti-gay charities."

Are you insinuating that Chik-Fil-a donates to anti-gay charities? Please, name one.

Comment_arrow

Bob Loblaw

1:40 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

I'm going to bet that at least some if not all of the $2 million Mr. Cathy donated to such "enlightened" groups as Exodus, which claims to "cure" gay people, came from CFA revenues.

Comment_arrow

Jane Sinclair

11:05 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

Once again...see my last response to you person-TOO-CHICKEN-to-post-under-your- real-name..."Bob Loblaw"...meh

Mia

1:56 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Tolerance cuts both ways.

Reply

Colin C.

2:01 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Jeff,

I don't know why you continue to get caught up in discussions about the Bible's relevance to questions such as these.

The Bible is a collection of ancient texts. We do not know exactly who wrote many of them nor much about the circumstances that prompted their authorship. We do not have original texts but rather copies of copies of copies, many of which have been altered over the centuries.

There is no proof (as in "scientific proof") that these texts reflect the word of a supreme being any more than there is proof that the Qur'an, the Vedas, the Tipitaka or any other holy text or tradition do.

The acceptance of any of these as the dictate of a supreme being, beings, or presence is based upon faith, not fact. And that is perfectly acceptable. Anyone should have the right to believe in and practice any religion that he or she chooses (as long as it does not harm other people).

But to attempt to use a "free" government such as ours to enforce the particular beliefs of any religion on everyone is inappropriate.

Therefore, for example, those who wish to pass laws that prohibit access to contraception simply because their particular religious sect believes it is sinful are way out of line in our democracy. They have every right to express their views but not to attempt to pass laws.

The homosexual issue is the same. We may, as a nation, pass legislation regarding this issue based on the will of the people, but not on the teachings of any religion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dee

2:20 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Spot on, Colin! And if I want to marry seven consenting women and a wolverine, who is the government to tell me I can't!

Comment_arrow

Jeff Ward

3:03 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Colin,

Yes! I could've made that point myself, but it's much more fun to watch 'em squirm when you point out that they're not living up to the whole enchilada. Then the convoluted excuses start forming and you expose those not very Christian Christian folks for who they really are!

Jeff

R G

3:54 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

It all boils down to free speech and the freedom we have been given. Everyone has the right to express their thoughts and beliefs. No one is being forced to buy anything from Chic fil A. If you don't agree with a company because of who or what they support, you have the choice to not spend your money there. It is no different than me choosing not to shop at a local store (whose name has a red bullseye attached to it) because they contribute money to the homosexual agenda.

Reply

Colin C.

4:29 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Dee,

Maybe The Department of Fish and Wildlife might object?

C

Reply

Mike

4:43 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Come ON!! This whole thing is NOT about Gay rights. Those of you who bash on the church or religion are just using this as an excuse.I believe we should do it like in the UK
http://www.civilpartnershipinfo.co.uk/
Civil "marriage" for those who want to be recognized in the church. and civil partnerships for those who don't. solves the problem right?
NO. because the Pro gay marriage folks aren't concerned about equal rights under the law, they want to change and attack christianity...while ignoring the same beliefs in Islam, Judaism, and in almost every black church. THAT"s why so many came out (pun) to support Chick-fil-A. People are attacking Christianity!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Drye

8:18 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Exactly,
This whole attack had nothing to do with the gays. It was instigated by liberal poltical types and blown up by the media before the facts were checked. Every chance they get the liberals love to bust down the church doors and instill their opinions on everyone. Christian bashing is their favorite past time.
The liberal motto is: "all men were created equal...except liberals are more equal than everyone else"

Colin C.

6:32 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

No Mike,

We are attacking the lack of equal rights resulting from the bigotry that prevents civil marriage in most states, a stance supported by many churches and conservative politicians.

Both have poured tons of money and much effort into campaigns to outlaw any form of legal union between same sex couples.

The churches (Christian, Muslim, et al) are being attacked for their bigotry and their political activities.

And, if anyone needs a Biblical quote that will easily cover and answer how we should approach all this try Matthew 22:37-40.

Yes, and read it again and again. It is Jesus speaking and it means just what it says.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike

9:55 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Colin
"Marriage" is a RELIGIOUS word. Recognized as a sacrament is many religions. The Gov't recognizes this and gives "civil marriages" certain rights. But "marriage" is NOT a right. It's NOT in the constitution. Churches and politicians and MOST Americans are against changing the RELIGIOUS definition of marriage. Obviously you didnt read the UK law. IT's a great compromise giving same sex unions every "right" as married folks but not called "marriage". Looks like you are to busy being self-rightous and calling people who disagree with you "bigots" than you are about actually giving equal rights.

Comment_arrow

Mike Bruno

11:20 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

@Mike
It would certainly be simplified if, indeed, the word "marriage" was owned by the religious. Alas, the etymology of the word "marriage" is ambiguous...and I have done a fair amount of research. It should be evident that, since we are still battling over it's meaning, the ownership of the term is NOT clear.

I would suggest that, from the civil perspective, the states recognize "religious marriage" and "civil marriage" as being identical under the law. Civil authorities can define it as they wish, and religious organizations can define it as they wish.

Comment_arrow

Colin C.

12:23 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Mike, If you wish to live your life following "moral" codes based on myth, superstition, and magical thinking that is your right. It is not your right to try to impose those codes on those who prefer to follow science and rational thought.

Colin C.

6:40 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

BTW, Jeff,

Your quoting Deuteronomy is very interesting. Makes me wonder... If this was so important as to be included by the author it would seem that it must have happened pretty often. The punishment, cutting off her hand, is just another example of how terrified men are of angry women (justifiable fear, I believe).

Reply

Rob Brundige

9:57 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

EV Cannon. Who are you? My new hero? Jeff, pay attention to this man!

Reply

Max

10:58 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Competing sources of propaganda attempt to lead us away from a fundamental issue.

The government, in attempting to do some social engineering, uses the tax code to provide benefits to some people which they do not allow to others. This is wrong. The whole notion of rewarding personal relationship choices by special tax benefits deserves to be struck down by the Supreme Court, and I continue to be surprised that no effective challenge has been made. The desire of same-sex couples to avoid being taxed at a higher rate is a legitimate one.

There is also nothing in the Constitution that justifies deductions for children, yet because the government apparently feels that to be childless is somehow unAmerican, it subsidizes reproduction.

When a Christian organization comes out in support of equal treatment for all citizens under our tax laws, I'll believe that they respect both biblical teachings AND the founding principles of the USA. It's not easy to be both a good Christian and a good American, but I believe it is possible. Being consistent would be an excellent beginning.

Reply

Candy

11:52 pm on Monday, August 6, 2012

Why does everyone try to save everyone else! I believe in traditional marriage but I also feel who has the right to control another persons life? You want to be gay? I don't care let them be married! !! Worry about your own soul getting to heaven and let them worry about theirs! If the bible said we should not love the opposite sex you wouldn't change my mind! As for CFA, who cares what they support with their money, the government takes my money in turn forcing me to pay for many things I do not condone, ie: abortion! Long story short, I guess everyone should stop shopping or paying taxes because someone might spend that money on something you don't like!

Reply

Dwight Swartwood

12:08 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Well, it seems we care more about this Chicken stuff than we do about our taxes.

Chick-Fil-a has a pretty strong and public belief tradition. They are not open on Sunday for example. Why? They believe Sunday is central to worship and family values. If you want chicken on Sunday, you can get it somewhere else.

If you don't like their high regard for the traditional family, you can get your chicken some where else as well. McDonalds and Burger King love when people become fixated on this stuff.

Reply

donaldowens

1:51 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Companies do give out samples. They are looking to put their products in potential consumers' hands. They wouldn't do it if it didn't work one of the place that always worked is "Official Samples" search online

Reply

thefunkychicken

6:14 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

If you want chicken on Sunday ,cook it at home.

Reply

Gabrielle McLeod

10:35 am on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I find it a little ridiculous that we boycott Chick-fil-a because the owner prefers traditional marriage, when in in the middle east, Muslims actually kill homosexuals... and will we stop buying gas from them? Of course not; we tolerate their intolerance. Why do we not tolerate the somewhat intolerant religion that shaped America, and instead tolerate the radically intolerant religion that's threatening to destroy America?
Furthermore, I can't believe how uninformed Jeff Ward is. Homosexuality is mentioned in the Bible on more than one occasion. And I wish people would stop citing Biblical rules from Leviticus to try to make Christianity seem ridiculous; the whole point of those rules is that they're stupid. They're impossible to follow. That’s the point of Christianity, to be freed from having to follow those ridiculous laws.
Someone needs to inform Ward to that it's usually a good idea to get your facts straight, before posting articles online.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob Loblaw

1:48 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

This post is so comically ignorant it's disgusting. You clearly know nothing about Islam (the largest religion in the world, by the way). And let's not forget about the Crusades if we're going to characterize entire religions as being bastions of violence extremism! Why are you allowed to cherry pick out the aspects of your religion you don't like (sorry, the Old Testament is part of your religion whether you like it or not!), the adherents of which could be considered extremists, yet you characterize all of Islam as a violent religion that's threatening to "destroy America?"

c.stange

10:28 am on Wednesday, August 8, 2012

To those claiming to be "Christians" posting here, Please get over yourselves!!! Since when did God ask for your help???? What he did ask us to do was share the Gospel The Good news of what Jesus has accomplished for us on the cross, and with his resurrection. And to Love God and Love our Neighbor as ourselves. Wouldn't doing this have been a better use of time, instead of advocating Chick-fil
-a. and being judgemental??? If I want a chicken sandwich, I will have a chicken sandwich wherever I want. The chicken Sandwich didn't have anything to do with this !!!!!

-

Reply

Jill K. Amoni

3:52 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Thank goodness for free speech so that I may tell Jeff Ward...yeah...YOU, dude...that your comments are the epitome of ASININE...
Your values or lack thereof, are NOT mine!
I came to this article because I wanted to find out when the Batavia Chick-fil-A will open and this popped up when I googled with NO date at all...just a long rant of a proud secular man!
When will it open? That's what I want to know. Can you please let me know something useful?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Bruno

4:03 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

Jill; you wield the word "secular" like it is something bad. One should understand that the opposite of "secular" is "theocratic". Our nation was founded as a secular nation and I honor our founders for it and we should all strive to live to their ideals.

BTW: Chick-fil-A says "Late summer 2012" for their Batavia opening.

Comment_arrow

Mike Bruno

4:19 pm on Thursday, August 9, 2012

...except for the slavery and stuff like that!! :-)

Colin C.

8:39 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Brian,

We are not "bashing Christianity". We are arguing against hate, bigotry, unfairness, and injustice. When some people use quotes from the Christian Bible to support and justify their intolerance we will argue against that also.

Gays, per se, are not the issue. The same disagreements have sprung up concerning slavery, civil rights, women's rights and a host of other issues.

Instead of accusing "liberals" of church bashing perhaps you might consider accusing "conservatives" of misusing the Bible for their own purposes. since you can "cherry pick" some passage from it to support almost any idea.

Again I would like to refer everyone in this discussion to Matthew 22:37-40. Whenever I have a question about what it means to be a Christian I go to that for an answer. I don't always like that answer but then, in any moral decision, the most difficult thing to do is usually the right thing to do.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Drye

10:25 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Excelent bible verse, however didn't you just acuse me of cherry picking? And when did conservative become synonamous with Christian? If you ever took a logic class, some Christians are conservatives and some conservatives are Christians, that does not mean all Christians are conservatives, and it deffinately does not mean that all conservatives are Christians. I would argue the point that many that call themselves Christians do not practice Christianity, but it is not my place to judge. The point is you are judging a man for having an opinion that is part of his religious belief PERIOD. He did not descrimnate and openly hires gay people to work at his business. It is like saying I don't condone divorce, I am against divorce, I wish divorce on no one, but I do not hold it against you if you are divorced. What is wrong with having that belief?

Colin C.

12:50 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Brian,

There is “cherry picking” random and sometime relatively peripheral passages in order to “prove” a particular point of view and then there are, according to Jesus, the two most important laws, upon which everything else is based.

But, as I have said before in this discussion, the real point is that it is counter to the intent of our democracy to pass laws that are based upon a particular group’s religious beliefs alone.

Many people who state an opposition to homosexuality identify themselves as “conservative Christians”. I did not create that designation.

Any person can hold any belief that he or she wishes in America but when that person acts on that belief to the detriment of others a line is crossed that makes that action unacceptable.

It has been widely reported that the president of this company has contributed a considerable amount of money to “anti-gay” causes. I believe that crosses the line from belief to active discrimination.

At any rate, I have not condemned the man or his belief. I have simply stated that I will not patronize his restaurant because there is a chance that a part of any money that I spend there will go to support a cause with which I disagree.

And I do oppose any action that discriminates against any group because of race, religion, creed, gender, or sexual orientation.

It’s time that we get past this tendency in America.

Reply

Brian Drye

8:24 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

"It has been widely reported that the president of this company has contributed a considerable amount of money to “anti-gay” causes. I believe that crosses the line from belief to active discrimination." So pro-family, or pro-marriage is now anti-gay. I think if they want to have civil unions that's fine although I do not support the gay life style. My personal belief is that it is harmful to society. If I donate to causes that seek to educate why this is harmful, or to share my opinion is that anti-gay? Even if you find it anti-gay that does not make it hate speach.

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how