Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

Geneva Teachers Stage 'Walk In' at High School, Middle Schools

The signs of Geneva Education Association solidarity continue, with teachers meeting en masse before school Thursday to walk in wearing green United We Teach shirts.

 

While suburban school districts such as Evergreen Park continue to deal with walkouts, Geneva teachers union members staged a "walk in" Thursday at the high school and middle schools.

On Thursday morning (Oct. 11, 2012), teachers wearing green "United We Teach" T-shirts gathered in the parking lots outside Geneva High School and the shared campus of Geneva Middle School North and Geneva Middle School South, then walked inside the building en masse.

Teachers union members have been wearing the green shirts and buttons that have come to symbolize the union's efforts to school primarily on Thursdays.

Teachers have been working without a contract since Aug. 15, being paid and receiving benefits under the same rates and conditions as the previous three-year contract. Contract talks continue under the orchestration of a federal mediator. The next contract meeting is scheduled for Oct. 23, School Board President Mark Grosso said at Tuesday's School Board meeting.

Geneva Education Association members continued to raise awareness and seek community support via a number of methods—asking parents to place "I Love Geneva Teachers" signs in front yards and offering informational coffees on the GEA website: gea4students.org.

Prior to Tuesday's School Board meeting, more than 200 union members formed a picket line in front of the Coultrap facility.

 

Read More

Get More From Patch!

Related Topics: Contract Negotitions, Geneva Education Association, Geneva High School, Geneva Middle School, School District 304, Teachers Union, and teachers strike

Sue J

12:56 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I find this utterly disgusting. They should be concentrating on teaching. It's not like there not being paid. What are they trying to prove? There are no parents (taxpayers) at the school just the children. Are they trying to get the children to go home and tell their parents that the teachers need to make more money. Greedy, Greedy, Greedy! My family has to sacrifice during this economic downturn. I don't need their greed to be laid on my back. I have enough of my own burdens. Please strike and be done with this.

Reply

Paul Bryant

1:07 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Dear GEA,

STOP demanding more of my money. It's for my children!

Reply

Jim J

1:19 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I've heard of Casual Friday, but not Political Rhetoric Thursday. Hmmmm.

Does anyone else think the union's color selection was intentional? Green connotes Money and Money connotes Greed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spence

2:00 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

..and of course, greed being what it is, ANY amount won't be enough. If we pay our Kindergarten teachers 300K, in 3 years time they'll want to be shown some 'respect' again.

Comment_arrow

Lou B.

2:31 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Spence, good point. In my business, I noticed a trend after several years of managing employees. When an employee complained that they weren't making enough money, I would give them more, thinking that would make them work harder, better, be more loyal, etc. I found out after years of this that the employees who always wanted more, were never happy, and their work never changed, regardless of how much I paid them. In fact, quite the contrary, super well paid employees tended to work less hard. The only method I ever found to improve performance, and involvement in the process was to incentivize the process. Positive incentives, paid out on a regular basis cause $$ motivated employees to really deliver... negative or no incentive programs, have just the opposite effect.

G.Ryan

2:25 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Intimidating the students now with their warfare? Will the students now be negotiating their new contract? Don't understand the purpose in polluting the schools with a "green T-shirt" parade but their unprofessional stunt reminds me of a toddler having a "temper tantrum" because he or she could not have that expensive toy.

Reply

John Doe

2:32 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Is there not Dress Code??? Doesn't look like professional attire to me!

Reply

John Doe

2:40 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

From the Student Handbook:

Students are expected to dress in a manner that promotes a positive learning atmosphere.

A student whose appearance is inappropriate or disrupts the educational environment will be sent to the office.

Reply

Bob McQuillan

2:48 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

If this is true, as they say in TV, the teachers just jumped the shark. What possible good could come from this display. They are now responsible for their actions. I hope someday they realize what they have just put at risk. Do they really expect the board of education to now sit down and discuss a "contract that is fair to everyone." They just disrespected the BOE, the support staff, the bus drivers, the taxpayers, their profession and most importantly our most precious resource, our children. If you want to picket, just call a strike and picket all day long. I think they are too scared to call a strike because they realize the community is not 100% behind them. If they want to risk their jobs, let's let them do it. They aren't going to be happy with anything less than a guaranteed yearly salary increase. I feel very sorry for those teachers that understand the issue at hand and are forced to be lumped in with this group.
What is next .... a group sick day? Why don't they get creative and just streak at Friday's football game wearing only their green t-shirts. Then at least you'll see everyone laughing at you in public. It's the old union tactic, if you can't defend your demands, create a diversion. Go ahead and keep playing your games, you are losing any community support you might have had by the minute. And they say they are afraid of losing "A Tradition of Excellence," what a joke!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Married to a teacher

3:05 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

The sad thing is that there are quite a few teachers that do get it and could absolutely live with no pay increase for the next one-three years. You don't hear from them because of fear of being ostracized by their fellow "liberal" teachers. Again the union is playing by "gang banger" rules and apparently the gang color is green.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

3:41 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Married to a teacher
I agree that there are many, many teachers that get the issue. Just think about it, there are over 400 teachers in the district. Reports have never put the "green-shirts" at more than 200 and I think that number is high. That means they have never had a majority at any function. Gang banger rules might be interesting to watch but they never accomplish anything. To those teachers that understand the issue, thanks. Again, I'm sorry you living through this nightmare. Keep of the great work, it will pay off for you in the end.

Susie Dooberstein

2:56 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Not to mention the 'slap in the face' (as they have explained it) to their colleagues in Admin who have had pay freezes for the past 2 years? I am so sad to see their behavior - where did the sense of entitlement come from? Can they not understand that while we supported them when times were good, times are not so good right now and we all need to tighten the belts?

Reply

btown95

2:59 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I say, good for those teachers!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Angela Kane

3:19 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Btown95--you are either a teacher, a union employee or what? Do you even live in Geneva, own a house or pay property taxes? Yep, still playing the role of the seagull....

Angela Kane

3:17 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

So now they are having a public tantrum. Holding the students and taxpayers hostage is not going to give them that warm fuzzy feeling for you. We get it--you're unhappy. Have you forgotten that you are PUBLIC employees? If you want to strike then go ahead. If not suck it up and deal with reality like the rest of us out here in REALVILLE.

Reply

Grace F

3:51 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Offer any private employee a contract guaranteeing their employment for the next couple of years with no raise & I bet they'd jump on it in this economy. They shouldn't be permitted to wear the green shirts in the school. How 'bout a dress code just like they have for the students. Let them strike & let's bring in replacements. No one is irreplaceable.

Reply

LMS

3:56 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I am a former Geneva student. From kindergarten through high school, I received a great education from wonderful teachers. This had such an impact on me, that I became a teacher. I taught for 3 years in a different state, in a school FAR different from any school we have in Geneva. My students had inactive parents, 100% were on free lunch programs, and fights and drug arrests were not outside the norm. This position paid far less than the what Geneva teachers are making, and I beleive there is the chance I was putting in a lot more work (50% of 7th graders reading at 3rd grade level). Now, I am NOT complaining. I actually loved my job and was understanding of the pay. I didn't become a teacher for money or a pension. I had no clue when choosing my major that my high school math teacher was making over 100,000/year. Now I am back living in the area and getting a teaching job is impossible. For 2 years I have struggled to even get an interview! I am coming to the table with 3 years experience, awards for test scores, etc. I also know that there are dozens of people just like me who would take any teaching position for a fraction of what these teachers are making right now. I really am let down that those inspirational teachers I had throughout my education are now acting in this manner.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mel

4:01 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

The thing is, you are exactly the type of motivated professional that would be an asset to the district. I suppose all we can do is hope the greenshirts strike and we can go about the business of filling the positions with bright young professionals like you.

Comment_arrow

Ann

11:09 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

LMS, thank you for your perspective. You bring the harsh reality of how coveted teaching positions are and how few opportunities exist in this current economic climate. So many citizens are learning how to function on a fraction of their former salary. As a tax payer, I beg the teachers to please recognize the financial hardships that exist and not further increase our current debt. It does not mean for one minute that you as teachers are valued any less. It simply means we recognize that there are times in which we must tighten our financial belt.

Rick Bouchard

4:39 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Here's some food for thought ... you are probably right that you don't have it as good as teachers or other public-sector employees do. Instead of berating teachers for standing up for something that they see as better, stand up at your job or to your politicians or to yourself and demand something better. Why is it always a race to the bottom for anti-union people?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

5:14 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Rick
You don't seem to understand the reason there is an issue. First, this issue is not about berating, disrespecting or slapping teachers in the face. Geneva teachers have it very well. This is about the financial future of the Geneva School District. You can't tell me the union reps didn't see this coming. Every local district received concessions from their teachers between 2009 & 2011. Every other Geneva district employee took at least a 1 year salary freeze. The union could have handled this contract by offering a salary freeze and the matter would have been settled. They chose not to do that and are now paying the consequences. They have every right to ask for a salary increase and the board has every right to say no. How are the teachers "standing up for something that they see as better?" Don't they see the 10 sick days a year they get, the 100% paid medical premiums, the 3-4 personal days they get, the holiday & spring breaks that they get, the 100% paid dental insurance, the planning periods they get, the tenure they get & the guaranteed benefit pension that they get. Don't insult the taxpayers by saying we aren't standing up. We are standing up and saying enough is enough. These teachers quite possibly are risking their jobs because they will not accept a salary freeze. The newer teachers are being used as pawns by the union. If anyone gets let go, it will be the new teachers not the ones that have been teaching for 20 years and make 6 figures.

Comment_arrow

Jerry

5:15 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Hahaha, stand up TO your politicians, Rich? More like hop in bed WITH your politicians if you're a Teacher Union lifer....watch and learn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVyNlJUKgug

Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

5:22 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Why do unions choose unprofessional tactics? Unions have become prostitutal. Schools are not picket lines and/or rally locations. Unions can take their acts right out of this country as they are a major cause of the problem.

Comment_arrow

Jerry

5:42 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

True, G. Ryan, unfortunately they are also the biggest campaign contributors. They'll remain a protected class as long as they keep buying politicians.

Transplant to IL

4:46 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Those teachers fighting this fight have no idea what the reality is for so many families and seem not to care what the reality is for the town as this debt looms large. I beg the school board to stay strong and not be bullied. I am so angry about these ridiculous displays. I say we send students to school tomorrow in red shirts to send a message that we support fiscal responsibility and want the teachers to stop acting like entitled brats.

Reply

VikingLover

5:00 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Race to the bottom? how about looking to the future. If a company isn't profitable, it goes bankrupt. Much like our State. Stay strong school board.

Reply

Fun with Numbers

5:07 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

For any teacher who may cross the picket line in the near future (you have our support). Please read http://www.nlrb.gov/sites/default/files/documents/48/nlrbform508.pdf this document
Examples of Unfair Labor Practices by a Union
The National Labor Relations Board provides the following examples of ULPs by unions:
 Mass picketing in such numbers that nonstriking employees are physically barred from entering the plant;
 Acts of force or violence on the picket line, or in connection with a strike;
 Threats to do bodily injury to nonstriking employees;
 Threats to employees that they will lose their jobs unless they support the union’s activities;
 Statement to employees who oppose the union that the employees will lose their jobs if the union wins a majority in the plant ;

Read More http://www.unionfacts.com/article/unfair-labor-practices/
Know the facts
In 2009, the NLRB reported that:
 Unions faced a total of 6,367 allegations of violating labor law;
 More than 87% of charges against unions were filed by union members;
 78% of those charges were cases where a union attempted to “restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed” by the National Labor Relations Act (Sec.8(b)(1)).

Reply
Comment_arrow

TeacherMom

12:21 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

I am a teacher who is currently a stay at home mom (cannot find a teaching job). There are hundreds, maybe thousands, like me who are highly qualified, educated, certified, with great experience who apply for any open position. If didn't have children in the district, I would cross a picket line in a heartbeat to get a job. However, I have kids in the schools and I would be terrified of repercussions on them. I couldn't live with the thought of my kids being punished or hurt by their teachers because mommy tried to get a job teaching. This is so messed up I am ready to pull them and send them to a private school.

Comment_arrow

Chris

12:28 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

TeacherMom...Do it! Pull your kids from Geneva Schools and put them in private schools. All of there teachers will be old "stay at home" mom's like yourself. You would really cross the picket line? Wow...what a scab...

Comment_arrow

Jib

1:44 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

I hear ya, TeacherMom - there are no doubt thousands of qualified young educators who would take the jobs of the disgruntled Union Greenshirts in a heartbeat.

But your right, the Greenshirts would most likely make life miserable for any kid whose parent went against The Union.

Comment_arrow

TeacherMom

1:57 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

Chris
Just because I want to teach doesn't make me a scab. I want to be able to use my skills in a job I trained for and love, to pay off my student loans from my master's degree in education, and pay my mortgage so I don't have to foreclose. I am just another person trying to make it in this economy.

Comment_arrow

Chris

2:05 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

TeacherMom ~
Mater's degree? Don't even think about teaching in Geneva...This school board doesn't want to give teachers any credit for a higher degree. And if you were to cross the picket line...good luck to you and the rest of your career in that district. It happened years ago in my school district and the 2 teachers who did cross (friends of board members) had to leave the district because they didn't have a friend in the district...If a department chair knew that you made that comment about crossing...your resume would end up in the garbage...Good Luck....

Ellie

5:41 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I know many teachers and I must say I am losing respect for those who participated in this action. It is unprofessional to behave like this while negotiations are still taking place. The duty to negotiate "in good faith" works both ways.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jerry

5:51 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

And for crying out loud, is it asking too much to keep it out of the classrooms? The 'in-your-face' resentment the Greenshirts are showing their neighbors in the community is truly appalling.

For the teachers who aren't getting swept up in the Union group-think, you will always have our support and gratitude for bearing with us through hard times.

Greenshirts? Go ahead and walk.

Comment_arrow

Chris

7:49 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

You're right Ellie.....I does work both ways! I wish the low-down things the board members have done could be posted....there are a lot of things that go on that the public has no idea about...

Comment_arrow

Ellie

8:24 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Chris, the negotiations are done behind closed doors. What do you know and who told you?

viking18

7:20 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I’m a student at GHS; they haven’t done anything to cause a rift in our education. When a student asks anything related to the picketing or asking if a strike is going to be held, the teachers all say they can't discuss it, and will not allow it to disrupt class time. Our teachers set a great example for us students, something they have been trying to get through to us since we were little, to pursue and work hard for each one of our goals. I think everyone of you should think of the things teachers have gone through, go through, and could go through; then maybe you will show some respect and understanding.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellie

8:48 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

You've bought into the meme that not giving the teachers a raise is somehow showing them disrespect. If that were true, then there are a lot of people in the community being severely disrespected everyday. Some have lost their jobs completely, some have had hours cut, some have taken a pay cut and some are losing their homes. As you get older, you will learn that it is not compassionate to give teachers raises while the rest of the community suffers with the higher taxes that will be needed to pay for these raises. Of course you love your teachers and want to protect them, but that's why they have union representation, They should not be bringing the negotiations into the classroom and yes, wearing the green shirts IS bringing the negotiations into the classroom,

Comment_arrow

Avett Green

6:39 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Thank you, Ellie. I couldn't have said it better.

Dave Larson

8:05 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

How terrible! The teachers wore green shirts and, God forbid, they walked into the buildings together! Oh, the humanity! Our poor children! We should cut all of their salaries to the level of the kids in China making our iPhones! After all, their only responsibility is teaching our children; it’s not like they have an important job like a banker or an oil company executive!

Since many of the comments on this story were posted this afternoon, I’m assuming that the Jerry Springer show was a rerun!

Get a grip people. There was no lack of learning today and our kids are just fine. Why is it okay for you to band together with your conspiracy theories, “facts”, and disdain for teachers; but it’s not okay for teachers and their supporters to gather and voice their opinions? I stand with our teachers. I believe that they have one of the most important jobs in this community and deserve to be paid accordingly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrs. Henderson

9:47 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Right on, Dave Larson! Teachers are important! How can we expect a Kindergarten teacher to read to 5 year olds and make anything under 90K (with full medical and lifetime pension)

It's like China! The Disdain that this community has shown these selfless, beautiful people is appalling!

Comment_arrow

Dave Larson

10:46 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

So what's your point Mrs. H.? Is it that all kindergarten teachers make $90k or that all they do is read to 5 year olds? Maybe everyone posting here should publish a detailed list of their compensation and benefits and we can all vote on what everyone should really be getting. We all know that making rash decisions about others with just a few "facts" is a great idea!

Comment_arrow

Mrs. Henderson

11:03 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Dave...do you not understand the difference between a public union employee and a private sector worker?

Comment_arrow

Robert Jr.

11:16 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

When athletes speak out against the NFL, the commissioner takes control. It is now time for the Superintendent to take control of the situation. I do not want anymore public displays of disobedience allowed on tax payer property. Superintendent- please take charge of the situation and create rules for what is acceptable and what is not on tax payer funded property.

Comment_arrow

Chris

7:46 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Henderson...What do you think a kindergarten teacher does all day with 50 students? I would love to hear your analysis....
How many years experience do you have teaching in the classroom???

Comment_arrow

Chris

7:53 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

FRED....you want the superintendent to take charge? So, you think that his salary is perfectly ok? I thought all of you teacher haters were upset with how much the board pays the superintendent and the assistant superintendents....

Lifelong Geneva Resident

8:05 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Beautifully said Viking 18. Stand strong and united Geneva Teachers, you are among the best and well respected in the community. You will always be supported and thanked for all you have done and continue to do for our children.

Reply

btown95

8:09 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

very intelligent comment viking18, you won't see respect or understanding from the majority that frequent this website.

Reply

Jeff

10:05 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Wow. I know a bunch of Geneva teachers and I like them. I just have a real hard time believing they're on board with all this.

It's been a bad time for jobs, savings and home values for the last 4 years - can't believe they're leaning on me for a raise right now.

Must be marching orders coming down from a union big-wig.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Jr.

11:08 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

How much does the union big wig make, who pays the union big wig, and how much time off from the day job does the union big wig take, while getting paid full salary and benefits? Double dipping may not be legal.

Debbie Hanson

10:38 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

So...what was the puprose of the "walk in" anyway? The certified staff are united. Yeah, we kinda get that by now. And...it's not having any impact on the students because it's just not. And...you don't run into a whole bunch of taxpayers between the parking lot and the front door. So who was left to see? The little people? The secretaries and custodians and nurses who have already taken pay freezes on behalf of the district? The employees who can least afford pay freezes? Because we find the green shirts and behaviors hurtul and embarassing? Because we feel that such issues should not be allowed to cross over the threshold? Please...leave your issues at the door, remember we ARE all still part of the same team and start showing some compassion for your fellow CUSD304 team members.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Robert Jr.

11:06 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I believe it was one of the last get togethers before the strike is announced - to show themselves a solidarity movement.

I understood the Polish solidarity movement. I understand the sweatshop movement. This one is not easy to figure out, based on the income figures that have been reported by the state. Quite frankly, it makes no sense to me.

Robert Jr.

10:58 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

They have already voted , and it is a strike.

It is disgusting that they feel empowered to politicize their views on the job, while violating policy, and it is appalling that the Board allos such behavior.

If a student gets detention, suspension, or any penalty for their poor judgement, then the professionals who make public displays counter to the education of our children should face an equal and proportional penalty.

I know athletes who were suspended or kicked off a team for actions they took- the same should hold true for teachers. They are really showing an arrogance that needs to be reigned in and their vote to strike has been determined.

Once again, the vote to strike has been determined.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrs. Henderson

11:07 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

If true, that's actually great news. I'm confident that the overwhelming sentiment in this community is to put an end to the public union entitlement madness.

School Board, you were a little late in coming to your senses, but I respect your resolve on this one. Well done.

Comment_arrow

Chris

7:43 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Your full of crap Fred....no vote has been taken....stop trying to get people to rally with you by posting false statements.

Comment_arrow

Dave Larson

7:56 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Fred, I think your tin foil hat is wrapped a little too tight!

James Cullen

4:11 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

The current 50% overpayment of the Union Greenshirts in salaries, benefits and pension is not a “victimless crime.” Geneva’s families and households are the victims today. And even worse victims are the students, who are condemned to suffer under a mountain of debt and escalating Illinois income tax burden when they grow up, because of that 50% overpayment.
This is the true civil rights issue of our time: the right of Illinois’ children to have a chance to achieve at least a middle class standard of living as adults, without being buried under a crushing burden to pay obscenely excessive Illinois government union pensions. The Geneva school board is fighting for the civil rights of Geneva's students, who are the victims of the Union Greenshirts’ child fiscal abuse. It’s like taking candy from a baby. Protests and pickets historically have been in support of victims of civil rights abuses. Thursday it was the “perps” who were protesting.

I hope the administration has learned to pay more attention to character when they hire the new teachers.

Reply

Jennifer

7:43 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

When I went to Back to school night the Geneva teachers were professional, caring and informative and every parent I observed was just enthralled and appreciative. Until..they got home and sat behind their computer. Then the teachers make too much and it seems a monkey could replace them. I wondered why those same parents did not make any statements to their children's teachers while they could? Why they listened intently and appreciated all the knowledge, hard work and experience their child's teacher brings to the table yet dismiss's their profession when they are an anonymous person at a keyboard? I so enjoyed reading the post from Lou B who states that paying employees well does not elicit better workers. It also states it took him years to figure this out. Maybe because it's not true. I've worked for numerous corporations. When I was rewarded with better pay you better believe I had a spring in my step at work and felt appreciated and yes did better work! With Lou's way of thinking people making minimum wage should just be delighted to have a job and stop complaining about not being able to feed their family! Since when did the American way become I've got mine you don't deserve yours? Did you vote for numerous new grade schools? Where they all necessary? So we'd rather put our money into nearly empty buildings without much thought or complaint but don't want to see those who shape our children's lives earn money they deserve?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellie

8:05 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

"I wondered why those same parents did not make any statements to their children's teachers while they could?"

Seriously? Yes, some teachers change children's lives for the better, I had a few teachers like that in my life, but there are also teachers who are vindictive bullies. I've run across a few of them as well. Teachers aren't saints. They are like people in every other walk of life. There are great ones, good ones, bad ones and horrible ones.

The last thing a parent wants to do is make school a living hell for their children. I didn't fall off a turnip truck. A parent speaking up against pay raises at a school board meeting or in a classroom about teacher negotiations would mark their child for subtle and blatant mistreatment for the rest of the school year and possibly longer.

Have you noted the pressure placed on parents to plant an "I love Geneva Teachers" sign in their yard? Those who want favorable treatment for their kids are pleased to oblige, That's how Geneva schools work.

Comment_arrow

Chris

11:01 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

ELLIE~ Sooooo....you believe that teachers would take out their frustrations on your child in the classroom?? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. You think teachers would punish your child by mistreating them in the classroom? Make their life a "living Hell"? Really? Are you serious?? If you feel that way about the teachers in Geneva, why the hell are you still here? I would be out of that town as fast as I could. Your statements are extremely unfair to all of the teachers in Geneva. Take the high road!

Comment_arrow

Julie

10:50 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

Ellie-Ignore Chris, she is a tad insane and she is extremely quick to strike (no pun intended) at anyone who doesn't share her exact beliefs. You are 100% correct in everything you wrote and 90% (maybe more) of Geneva knows it. Trust me, I grew up here. Okay, Chris...lay it on me..I can't wait for your name calling to begin. Say what you want, I am not bothered by it and can contain myself. We're sick and tired of this. BOE stand tall...we will back you original offer which was generous. It could have been cuts, afterall! Northern Illinois is at the ready to inform all recent graduates of any strike. I also am aware of many, many teachers with years of experience who are willing to go back as well. DO NOT GIVE IN! Oh, and the signs? Rick Anderson has the best idea out there!

Dave Larson

8:02 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Feel the hate... You teacher haters would make Darth Sidious proud!!

Reply

LMS

8:14 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Aside from some people, I don't think the comments on this story are about "teacher hating." As an unemployed teacher myself, It is just hard to see many families struggling (Yes! Even in Geneva!) and many teachers asking for more money.
I agree that years of work, experience, and education should be compensated... but as an example, that would be like me being paid upwards of $30/ hour as a babysitter (Education degree, 10+ years of experience, etc).

Reply

Robert Mann

8:16 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

This situation is like one in which an election is to be held before either candidate has revealed a position on the issues. The Board and Union ought to disclose publically what issue(s) is or are preventing agreement. Until that happens, all the comments for or against either the Board or the Union are meaningless.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bell

9:43 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Unless the comments are regarding the lack of professionalism and respect the teachers are demonstrating by wearing their 'colors' in the classroom.

Regardless of the state of negotiations, it's not appropriate.

Comment_arrow

Chris

10:22 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Why would you make it public? So quacks like Bob McQullian can give their "expert" opinion? If he doesn't like what's written down about the issues, he'll just crumple it up and throw it in someone's face.
As far as the shirts....what's wrong with "United We Teach"? Nothing wrong with United We Stand.....I think the shirts are great! I wish I could get one. I think I know where I can find a couple of them.

Sherry

8:22 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

I believe we have awesome teachers, and better pay should be given to awesome teachers. The pay to public employees is from tax dollars. Unions need to look at the demographics of the community supporting them, being mindful there are a handful of very wealthy, but that is not the norm. A friend of ours is a Geneva bankruptcy attorney he stated there were 52 foreclosures in the Eaglebrook Subdivision. The largest subdivision to support Western Avenue. I have friends whose husbands have taken pay cuts or been asked to not work and not get paid one day a week, just so they could keep their jobs. More moms are going back to work to fill in the gap of their husband's lowered income perhaps to keep to their budget, or because they were really struggling financially with less pay. Before teachers ask for more money they should go find out the facts about what is happening in their community. I've never seen so many stores close down, ever. Obviously, there are less people spending money! If the tax payers are tightening their belts and spouses are going to work, then the same should be expected of a public employee. We hope it is short term. And no-one said the teachers would NEVER get a raise again. We're saying understand our burdens and walk shoulder to shoulder with us during a trial. You are working hard, just like private sector employees, but private sector employees can't demand a raise in this economy. You should mirror that.

Reply

Dwight Swartwood

10:52 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

The next step for teachers is to take over Geneva schools forcefully. What more would they have to do to drive the administration and school board to make them stop this terrible distraction?

They have lost their credibility. Putting the kids into this. Showing no regard for their administrators or employers. They are teaching kids by very bad example. The sit-ins last fall were people out of work and no opportunity. Geneva teachers have high paying jobs. However, taxpayers have asked them to share in the economic sacrifice needed and this is their response. The hell with the Geneva community, schools, families, kids and our standing in the greater area. Their demand is: "We want more money and we want it now, you find a way to pay me." This is acting in good faith?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

11:04 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

Dwight-
High Paying?? According to you?
What should teachers make? Seing that you're an expert....

Comment_arrow

Jib

2:08 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

"...taxpayers have asked them to share in the economic sacrifice needed and this is their response. The hell with the Geneva community, schools, families, kids and our standing in the greater area. "We want more money and we want it now, you find a way to pay me."

I don't think they give a rip about the economic struggles faced by everyone else. In fact I think there's a certain resentment toward their peers who went on to careers in business or industry.

Max

11:17 am on Friday, October 12, 2012

I think the best possible thing would be for GEA to call a strike -- and the sooner the better.

At least half the GEA membership will ignore the picket lines and go to work. The remainder will trickle back to the classroom over the following few days as they realize how poorly they have been represented. The so-called "teachers'union" will be done for as a significant force in D-304.

If GEA wish to be of value to the community, they had best turn their energies to improving the results achieved by students. If pay were linked to performance, the future for GEA members would look a lot brighter. As long as pay is linked to anything else, our students are not getting what we want for them, despite rising costs.

Reply

Sherry

12:15 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

There are several reasons teachers can't be judged and paid by test results...#1 the variety of students ability and their background. In my family alone I have two kids who stink at taking tests, but they get good grades and are smart. I have one very bright child who stinks at Chemistry and got his only D ever. If his teacher were better could he have gotten a better grade? Maybe....a C? But seriously not all kids are created the same. It would be unfair to blame a teacher. The year my parents divorced my grades significantly dropped...I was despondent. Should a teacher have to answer for that? In poorer areas where there is little support to the student at home from over worked parents or a single parent who has little education the teacher cannot be blamed for the student's lower performance. I don't see that ever happening. They need a different way to evaluate teachers, I agree, but it can't be tied mostly to the student's test scores. I'd rather see a little more money spent on making sure we have the resources available to the kids who are struggling, so our test scores go up for each school, than give a pay raise to ALL the teachers.

Reply

Ken Schuman

3:06 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

I doubt they really want to be graded by standardized tests in Geneva either. the upside for improvement is pretty small. There does need to be a way to measure the quality of the teaching but the measurement must include input from the teachers who do the job everyday. It can't be just from the top down. The teachers would be smart to get in front of this issue instead of trying to hang on to the outdated step and lane increases. Showing up for another year on the job doesn't automatically make you more effective.

Reply

Bob McQuillan

4:21 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

Chris writes
"Why would you make it public? So quacks like Bob McQullian can give their "expert" opinion? If he doesn't like what's written down about the issues, he'll just crumple it up and throw it in someone's face."

I don't claim to be an expert, I'm a regular taxpayer who is tired of increased taxes with the same level of service. I decided to research how taxing bodies develop their budgets & levies and have shared that with the community. We source & verify everything posted on www.genevaTaxFACTS.org. Now people don't like the way it is reported. Sorry, I can't make the state & district report things the way you want them. Putting yearly salaries & benefits side by side over a short period is the only way you can compare what the actual increases and expenses are. People complain that stipends are included is base salary and thus the yearly increases are inflated. They are only inflated the first year a teacher takes on a new stipend. The next year the increase is based on the previous year's stipend. If people are getting 12% increases because of stipends, maybe we are paying too much in stipends.
When people personally attack me, it only shows that they can't defend their own position. Anyone who dares speak out and provides accurate information, will be attacked. I'm used to. I also know that I and GenevaTaxFACTS have spoken the truth for more than 4 years. An informed public is a powerful force. I'm glad Geneva has decided to listen to the truth.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

11:07 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

"An informed public is a powerful force."

So true. Between the work that people such as yourself are doing to uncover the fiscal issues we're facing, and the forum provided by The Patch, I think everyone has a much clearer grasp of the situation.
5 years ago I probably would have put a I (heart) Geneva Teachers sign in my yard, completely unaware of the reality of the situation.

Comment_arrow

Wayne

7:38 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Great job Bob M... we appreciate your work keeping Geneva residents informed. He is only standing up for taxpayers... face it, who among you wants to see your taxes raised another $400? Stay strong Board; you have our support!

HMT

12:11 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

I am so sad that this is what Geneva has come to. When I began working here, I was amazed at the support the students had from parents, teachers and community members. I could not believe that people moved to Geneva, had children, sent those children through 304, sent their children to colleges (often prestigious ones), and then welcomed them home because these graduates wanted to send their own children to Geneva schools. This speaks volumes for the excellence of CUSD304. Now, many believe that teachers are asking for more than they are worth, that their request to be respected and compensated for their dedication is outrageous. What many neglect is that when moving to Geneva, people were aware of the taxes. Despite this, they still settled here because of the amenities--including an award winning public school district. Teachers do so much more than what people see. We wake up early to grade papers or plan activities, to buy materials or treats for our kids. We stay up nights because we worry about that one student each year who just doesn't seem to be ok, or we walk that student down to guidance when they reveal that they may not make it through the day and they are too scared to tell this to their parents.. What would you do if a
teacher wasn't there to help that child? What is that child worth? We know that they are worth everything. Many teachers are parents and understand that it is our job to be the best, and yes, sometimes that needs to be paid for.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heath

7:44 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

HMT - do you honestly believe the community's reluctance to continue escalating teacher pay has anything to with the perceived value of your work? That isn't the issue! Maybe that's the rallying cry that your Union bosses have said so often that you start to believe it.

Even if the Union decides to work with the community and accept a temporary freeze, we are still in a whole lot of fiscal trouble. Don't believe the Union bosses who are painting a picture of a district flush with cash.

Bob McQuillan

1:12 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

HMT
Your comments are exactly what is wrong with the teachers position. This issue has nothing to do with what people think of the role teachers play in the community. This is a financial issue that has been brewing since the last contract. I'm sorry the teachers can't understand the real issue. The district budgets continue to increase while the value of houses continues to fall. Even to get the same revenue as this year, school taxes on a $288,000 house will increase over $400 next year. That is crazy. That does not include any increase in any expenses that might occur. This year, the district is spending $4 million more than they receive. The students will continue to have the support from parents and community members. It is the teachers decision if they will continue to support the students if they don't receive a salary increase. Teachers are not being asked to pay more for their benefits, they are being asked to take a one-year salary freeze. Not a decrease in pay, a freeze. Last year Cary teachers took a 3% decrease in salary. Teachers were never guaranteed yearly increases in future contracts.
I do agree that those who started a Masters Degree program during the 2009-2012 agreement should receive the lane increase when they complete that degree. I would assume that is only a handful of teachers.
Ask any resident that has been here for more than 15 years, no one expected the taxes we are now paying nor did they expect $309 million in debt service.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HMT

8:28 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Bob and Heath,
I appreciate many of your statements and agree with them. Many teachers--not heavily involved in the union nor swayed by union rhetoric-- have discussed the benefits of the pay freeze. You have to understand that we know about the fiscal issues that exist. As a homeowner, I understand the frustration of rising taxes and falling home values. But, this is not the fault of the teachers. Perhaps frustration should be directed at banks, real estate agents, and politician who took advantage of a situation that now places people in the miserable situation. Since people will not do this, what has happened is that people are now attacking the Geneva teachers and the teaching profession because we are asking for what is believed to be too much. As I read the posts on this page and other pages, I see many who villify teachers and suggest that we are the problem because we are not worth what we make. This is ridiculous, and it is my responsibility to defend myself and my profession. I think that it is time for conservative teachers defend the profession so that people understand it is not just about money it is about the way that we are perceived in the community as well.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

9:52 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

HMT
I'm not surprised to hear that many teachers not heavily involved in the union nor swayed by the union rhetoric understand what the issue is about. I would not be surprised if and when a strike vote is taken, that a majority will vote not to strike. Teachers have a lot to lose if a strike happens. If the only issue is a salary freeze, a strike of any length is going to eat up any increase you might receive. I'm convinced that the IEA is pulling the strings and the GEA is taking orders from above. This discussion never needed to occur. The union should have realized that the last contract was very lucrative for the teachers and the talks should have started with the teachers offering a one-year salary freeze. The contract would have been settled before the end of the last school year and everyone would have accepted the terms. The union's demand for yearly salary increases, based on the 2009-2012 agreement was uncalled for. It showed a lack of respect for the board, the taxpayers and other support staff. If a strike occurs, the support staff will take a financial hit because they will not be paid during the strike. The union reminds me a child who asks for 10 things for Christmas then ignores the 9 things they received and complains about the 1 thing they didn't get. Focus on what you have, not on what you don't have.

Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

10:22 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

HMT-blaming the banks and real estate agents has no correlating merit to your statement. Please take some responsibility. You teachers are the ones who joined the UNIONS and our represented by them. By joining the teachers unions within Illinois is thus supporting the Democratic political party who gets a "kickback" from the unions. If your profession had any class or integrity you would of never involved yourself with these legal corruptive individuals and their practices. Now that is the truth. So please don't give me your exchanges that teaching in this State is all that pure and innocent because us taxpayers now know what is really taking place here with our FUNDS.

Max

3:59 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Geneva parents who are, or who might become teachers in the Geneva schools have fears of repercussions to their children if the parent were to cross a GEA picket line. If that is not a red warning-flag for how low community respect for the union-thug mentality of the IEA/NEA has sunk, I don't know what would be.

Please GEA, show us all that you have too much self-respect to allow your union reps to justify your being characterized in this manner.

Reply

Max

4:13 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

"I (heart) Geneva Teachers"?

Well, not the way things are going lately, I don't.

But here's a sign I would be willing to put in my front yard:

"I (dollar-sign) Geneva Teachers!"

Reply

HMT

9:47 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Disappointed and others who have the same points,
Many teachers have discussed the same issues. We are well aware of the economic crisis that exists as many of our husbands and wives, neigbors and friends are going through similar situations. From many of the statements placed on the posts, it seems that many people believe that the teachers have been unwilling to address the possiblitiy of a pay freeze in some capacity. That is simply untrue; many have discussed this possibility. What I would like to see is the truth. Both sides are manipulating data and presenting it in a way that makes them look right and the other side look wrong. How is that possible? Why is the board saying the teachers are not moving while the teachers are saying the board is not moving. People keep saying that information is power, so why, then are so many of us not hearing the truth?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

3:20 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

The linked article quotes the local union president on the compensation issue, specifically the freeze. It is clear that the union will not accept a freeze. If the majority of teachers will accept a freeze, they better let their union rep know. The reason your aren't hearing the truth is because the board & administration is adhering to the confidentiality agreement that both sides agreed to. Only one side has made public comments. In the future, I would like to see all talks open to the public. There is no state law that requires all talks to be held behind closed doors. The taxpayers end up paying for the agreement so why all the secrecy?

http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20121012/news/710129691/

Comment_arrow

Jeff

3:36 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

So we've got union members wearing political attire in the classroom, in apparent violation of the law...a union rep going to the newspapers in spite of the confidentiality agreement,
And they're clamoring for "respect". Uh huh.

EnoughAlready

4:07 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Strike vote planned for October 17 according to friend who is a teacher in the district. Teachers are asking friends to show of support by asking people to vote in a poll by the Kane County Chronicle on 10/13. They are "discouraged" that the vote is clearly not going in their favor. Hmmmm... I wonder why...

It is on the home page, bottom right corner and looks like this:

http://www.kcchronicle.com/

Reader Poll
Do you support the Geneva teachers in their labor dispute?

Yes
No
I don't care

Reply

Angela Kane

5:43 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Just a note on all this: some people have commented that it's not teachers fault that we are in our current financial situation. That is only partially true. When the referendums were proposed a few years ago to build new schools which got us into overwhelming debt, MANY teachers supported and advocated for passage of the referendums. Some teachers did not participate--but many did. They have just as much responsibility for the debt as members of the BOE who before their election to the BOE advocated for the referendums. And I remember some of them telling us it wouldn't cost us any more money to staff the extra middle school, etc. Ya sure, and I have a bridge to sell you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Paul Bryant

7:41 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Disappointed,

From the gea4students site...

"At the same time, District 304 has gone ahead with several costly initiatives including the purchase of I-pad type computers for students, the replacement of the grass football field, and repairs to the auditorium. They have even abated tax payments that they were originally expected to receive. The GEA supports these measures."

Funny that we didn't hear any objections from the GEA about these "costly initiatives" when they thought they could also get a yearly raise.

Doesn't sound very understanding from their side, does it?

Angela Kane

6:30 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Disappointed : No, I have no responsibility for the fiscal crisis we are in. We did not overbuy/overspend for our home, have not used our home equity as a piggy bank, have saved and invested responsibly, and did NOT believe the tripe proposed in the referendums. Some of the arguments proposed were just plain stupid. We did not vote for the referendums and never believed the "put on the credit card" craziness. BUT I remember many teachers who pushed for yes votes. Please don't tell me the union didn't promote yes votes (since there has been some discussion on that before I am not presenting some startling new info). Everyone who voted yes is culpable. Everyone who thought shiney new buildings were nirvana for 304 is culpable. We overbuilt and should suck it up, mothball a building or 2 and/or sell them off. We need a quick injection of fiscal conservatism or we are sunk. I am heartened by people who have come to the realization that we are in debt, the economy kinda stinks, and we need to hold the $ line.

Reply

Angela Kane

7:24 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Disappointed: I have over 20 years on you and no, I am NOT (as are others in situations similar to mine) responsible for the economic situation. Try to turn whatever phrase you want, try to demean my proposals, insult me--do your best. Still not going to take responsibility for the mess we are in. Have you ever run for school board and stated your fiscal policy in public? I did back in 2003 and said, "We can't continue to expect our local taxpayers to bear this incredible burden without looking at each expenditure and knowing we are doing our best to wisely spend those dollars." I favored "utilizing the available current vacant property" without putting us in debt. So 'Disappointed' --walk a mile I my shoes. Got a better plan? Run for the school board. I did and lost. People were not interested in my message of fiscal conservatism. The folks elected advocated for the fiscal policies that have us taxpayers in economic peril.

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

7:38 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Angela, you go girl! He came after me also. Like a democrat is going to tell us how to be fiscally responsible when the Democrats are responsible for our corrupt state and the teachers pension mess. Democrats want to tax anything and everything that moves..And it sounds Disappointed you are an expert so by all means...go for it.

Angela Kane

7:47 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Well 'Disappointed' -- I guess you are just another thug demeaning anyone with whom you disagree. Have at it. Enjoy. I refuse to back down to thugs like you--and I suspect there are tons of other people in our wonderful town who are tired of being dissed by thugs. Do we have buildings that are under utilized? Yes. Go ahead--keep them open--don't make any substantive changes. We'll see how long it is until we face economic ruin.

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

8:17 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Disappointed....I am becoming disappointed. And if there are fiscally responsible Democrats I don't think they are wearing "green shirts" do you?

Comment_arrow

Sherry

8:19 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Whoa! Let's be civil, calling names isn't going to help the discussion. Neither will people who were fiscally prepared making fun of those who were not for an unforseeable economic depression. We are where we are for many reasons, all the way back to when Clinton said "Every American should own a home". It doesn't matter HOW we got here, we're here. A one year freeze on teacher's pay is NOT asking a lot. The people they work with (bus drivers, secretaries etc) took that pay freeze and I'm guessing most of those people make LESS money than almost all the teachers individually do.Teachers didn't revolt when they saw others let go or taking a pay raise freeze, it wasn't hurting them so why stand up UNITED? I'm not sure what all the fuss is about! If other 304 district employees can take a freeze on raises and other employees can be "let go" to save money, then teachers you need to step up and join the ranks. Tax payers produce your income and a great deal of them are hurting or making doing with LESS. This has NOTHING to do with the quality of your work or the value of your position. Get a grip and listen to your employer -- the tax payers! We say "No, sorry not this year" The economy won't be bad forever, we are seeing signs of recovery; but let us actually experience the recovery a bit before you put your hand out! Be GRATEFUL you have such a wonderful job. I'm grateful for mine and my husband's job, but we aren't expecting or asking for raises, we like our jobs and need them

Angela Kane

8:09 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Yes, you were demeaning and dismissive. Not once in any of my postings on the Patch have I suggested cutting at all costs. You made sweeping ASSumptions. I have always promoted being respectful of every penny the taxpayers provide to any public body. Unfortunately that has not been the case at Dist. 304, in our state government and nationally. Anyone who has promoted adherence to fiscally conservative policies has been insulted, marginalized, called filthy names, etc. We all need to take a step back and look at where we are and how we got here. Again, I will not be bullied by thugs who refuse to wake up to the fiscal realities we face. And again, I suspect many many other voters in Geneva are sick and tired of being accused of hating teachers, harming kids or wanting to cause embarrassment to our school district. The Patch is my open window: I'm sick and tired and I'm not going to take it anymore!

Reply

Angela Kane

8:33 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Mothball a school(s) and the electricity bill goes down, you don't need the support staff or administrative staff, you don't use as much natural gas. Shut off sections of underutilized buildings and save money. Get rid of assistant this or that in administration and combine responsibilities. Don't want to do the job with added duties--then you're gone. Put the building(s) up for sale/rent. At least come up with a strategy other than raising my taxes. Has the school board been presented with REAL cost cutting proposals from the high paid administrators we have? Do we need all the people we employ? Do we need to get new buses as often as we do? I want every administrator to justify their job and their salary--that's right, every one. In private enterprise it's done! When we start treating the running of school districts as a business then they will run better and more economically. When we employ people in educational administrative positions (non-teaching related) who have business degrees and not business-Ed degrees and maybe some real business experience we might do better. Tons of proposals have been posted on this site and now suddenly I'm supposed to be the only source? I ran for BOE--I put my neck on the chopping block. Now it's time for others to step up. The ones there now who put us in this hole need to step down.

Reply

G.Ryan

8:35 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

But placing a one year salary freeze only puts off the inevitable. This bond repayment is a 15 year proposition that needs to be placed into the equation.
Disappointed....pointing out hours worked and kindergarten teaching are some of the variables that are rigors of this occupation that the teachers themselves chose. If they don't like the hours or the job duties they can find another vocation. Making a mockery out of this for attention is getting old. They are not victims here we are all feeling the pain of this economy. The system needs overhauling. It is not sustainable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

8:59 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

The mockery was of the green kind. They were in our face at the School Board meeting talking about how they deserve more $$$. They were out on RT38 holding signs and they were marching at Coultrap on Monday. The union was passing out support pamphlets. That is my examples of the mockery i observed. But the system created this money monster mockery...the system pays them for royalities. Why should they get automatic cost of living raises? Now it(the system) has created an entitlement attitude. How do you get rid of "you owe me because I exist."???

Angela Kane

8:41 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

And yes, there have been people on this site who have been thugs and tried to bully folks into silence. Let's call them out for what they have done. Folks, aren't you sick and tired of being told you don't respect teachers or don't care about kids or whatever is the attack du jour? We need to be able to exchange ideas, to express our concerns, and to complain about the economic fix we are in without being accused of being insensitive or uncaring or whatever. I'm sick of it.

Reply

Angela Kane

9:14 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

If you don't think folks on the BofE don't read the Patch you are sorely mistaken. Assorted other elected officials read it also.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

11:01 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Disappointed
Comments are getting a little out of order but to answer your question on what a 1 year salary freeze means. My answer is based on what Mr. Collins (Asst. Super of Human Resource) wrote in an e-mail when i asked the question. Also what the teachers have mentioned at school board meetings.
If a 1 year hard salary freeze is inacted for the 2012-13 school year, every teacher would make the exact same salary that they did in 2011-12. There would be no increase in step or lane. One issue that a teacher raised Monday night what that those finishing their Masters programs should be entitled to the lane increase for a Masters because the district agreed to that teacher going back for their Masters. This was apromise that the district made to the teacher. In this one particular case, I do agree that the teachers that finished a degree and would have been entitled to a lane increase this year should receive that increase. I would assume that less than a handful of teachers would fall into this category. I believe that all other lane increase should be frozen for this school year.
I'm a little uncomfortable going into detail on questions like this because other than what as been said in public and what Mr. Collins wrote to me, I have no knowledge of the contract talks.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

12:49 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Disappointed
At this point in time, I'm not planning to run for the board in the Spring election. I believe it is too early for anyone to decide unless they are already on the board. I think a lot depends on how this contract plays out, what is done on the tax levy in December and what the current 4 board members plan to do. I would assume GenevaTaxFACTS will hold a candidates forum as we have done in the past two board elections. I think this election will be key and will set the direction of the district for the next decade. It will be important for candidates to express their views clearly and for the voters to understand the challenges we face over the next decade.

Comment_arrow

Thomas

10:31 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Bob, Does your response mean that there is a "possibility" that you will run in the spring? You have proven to be a pretty smart guy and I would think you are much better off staying in your current position as the champion for the Geneva taxpayer. It is so much easier "holding people accountable" than being on the board and being "held accountable". You have become a self-taught expert on how the sausage is made but not until you get inside the factory will you really know all of the "truths" behind the product and then all the FACTS might not line up so nicely. You are like the BOE's Grover Norquist holding congressmens' feet to the fire without having to get burnt yourself. You have earned the loyalty and adulation of many of Geneva's citizens but how long will your G.Ryans, A. Kane's, S. Ellis's, D.Swartwood"s, et al. loyalty last if your on the board and they don't like the results of a decision you were a part of? Just ask Mike McCormick.

G.Ryan

9:42 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

But with all due respect to Mr. Nagel. The Patch can be an educational tool also.
We at any age can always be inspired. I am just a problem solver and when I see this outrageous spending and DEBT it can really take away your "American Dream motto". Because in this case, the American Dream is renting not owning...Sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

3:00 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Thomas
I ran for the board in 2005 with pretty the same message - spending has to be controlled. The issue still remains today and has gotten much worse. The most important thing is that the right people run for a board seat.
You'll need to ask Mike McCormick about his experience on the board.

G.Ryan

10:41 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

The American Dream was once owning a home because that is what couples/families strife for. But now in this climate, the American Dream of home ownership is not an asset it is a liability due to escalating property taxes. I have been here 8 years and every year they have increased. How does one keep up? You cannot because your salary does not adjust to this demand. This is my point with the greedy greens they don't seem to understand that we cannot keep up with their pay scales/rewards,tax levies, tax rates and now bond repayments. This community is in deep deep trouble and they don't seem to comprehend the magnitude of this. This is a 15 year payment loan pay back.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

12:02 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

School District of Geneva is approximately 309 MILLION IN DEBT.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

12:36 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Disappointed
If you follow this link https://www.geneva304.org/board_of_education/meetings/documents/Geneva_Debt_Service_PresentationJuly9_2012.pdf
it will take you to a presentation that was made in July 2012 about the bonds. Go to page 10 and look at the 2nd from the last column on the right titled Total Outstanding Debt Service. That column represents the yearly payments for the debt service. Currently we are in the $15-16 million range and will increase to $24.9 million in 2019 (tax levy year 2018). The board is currently planning to use fund reserves (currently @$57 million) to offset the yearly increases in debt service. Between now and 2026 that yearly increase will total @$69 million. The $57 million in reserves is the result of the board taking the maximum tax levy available and then not spending the total levy. Thus this money came from overtaxing the residents over a period of years. The money is taxpayers money and should either be returned to the taxpayers or applied against the debt. Also keep in mind DEBT is the money owed not including interest while DEBT SERVICE is the debt plus interest.

Comment_arrow

Bob McQuillan

1:38 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Disappointed
The reserves should be spent on paying down the debt or refunded to the taxpayers. It should not be used to pay day-to-day expenses of the district. The way the bonds were structured is a bit confusing but is explained well by Don Cummings at the last GenevaTaxFACTS town hall meeting. The link to that video is http://www.genevataxfacts.org/School-Board-and-Geneva-Tax-Facts-Meetings/08-29-2012.html
If you have any additional questions or you have a group of friends or neighbors that have questions, I would be happy to meet with you and answer any questions, to the best of my ability, you have. Just e-mail me at bobm@genevataxfacts.org We can pick a good time & place.

Sherry

11:33 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

If you don't know if doing away with Unions would save a bundle of money then please visit a state that has no teacher unions. The state I came from had just as WONDERFUL teachers as district 304, but NO union. Yes, its true! They did have tenure & compensation for more education. Nationwide those teachers make 15% less than other states. Personally, I don't think an Art teacher in district 304 should make $109k/yr. Reality is there are Unions because of the varying opinons of what teachers should make. Step and Lane might mean more student loans and stress on a teacher, but it also means keeping sharp and ensures they make a LOT more money for doing the same job year after year. Its rather brilliant. To save tax payers money and rid ourselves of inept teachers we need to rid ourselves of tenure, pensions & the union. Tenure ensures an unkind teacher keeps her job. Come now we've all seen at least one in our child's schools. Provide advice, counseling or reprimending or fire them, don't let them hide under the shield of tenure! We can do better now. Haven't most of our parents in private sector lost their pensions abruptly? Now, now, teachers shouldn't lose them! But they need phased out for new teachers and given 401k options instead, just like the private sector. My friend is 58 and making $75k/yr.for life as a retired teacher. (She's healthy). If I need to say more, then we are talking in a bubble, not reality. No unions, no tenure and no pensions = saving money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

11:48 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Sherry, I agree the unions are polluting the educational system with their rhetoric, greed, arrogance and waste like I stated before. But now how do you change the mindset of "entitlement" "give me because I exist or co-exist". If you attended the Board Meeting last Monday you would of seen for yourself their endless complaining about their jobs and how they should be compensated for long hours and extra work etc. It was one after another reading off their own scripted speeches for over 1 hour. I have never witness something like it. And they would all applaud each other at the end(like a high 5). They are not going to give up their union it is there $$$$ security. But us taxpayers will go bankrupt as you are already seeing in the increase of foreclosures last month.

Sherry

11:47 pm on Saturday, October 13, 2012

By the way, teachers who choose to work in a "low income" area (determined at federal level) for five years; as long as they make all their student loan payments on time during the five years, there is a program that forgives the remaining student loan balance...so I don't want to hear about how teachers need a high salary to pay off their student loans. Schooling and Employment has a wide array of choices and sacrifices. No-one gave my husband a high salary just because he was a college graduate, brilliant and great at his profession. In fact he worked his way through college with no help from Mom & Pop, and had no student loans until he did post graduate schooling. He put in time and effort and proved himself worthy in his profession and his pay moved up, SLOWLY. Our retirement is 401k's, IRA's and whatever we were resourcful enough to conjur up in investing or flipping. If we can do it, then certainly our smart teachers can too. There is NO need for tenure, unions or pensions in our school district. Its riduculous to me that teachers think they need something better than the private sector. There is a company match at work in the 401k plan...I'd be more willing to entertain that, then a pension or union.

Reply

Sherry

12:17 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

G. Ryan, I wasn't at the board meeting, but it isn't surprising. When a person lives in a bubble they're attitude becomes one of entitlement....it's hard to believe of all professions a teacher can't see it; there are so many wonderful books about a spoiled prince or princess who has no idea how good they've got it. Teachers pay is soo high compared to the Western non-union states. There are sooo many young people fresh out of school hungry for jobs. It smacks of ingratitutde and an unwillingness to see the world around them as it is. How am I, the tax payer doing who pays their wages? Our family has had serious financial adjustments and we are just now rising back up...its not just that we were unprepared for a depression, but our employer isn't moving us to a less expensive state as promised after our 3 year stint in IL. We had no plan to afford this state, and then our taxes went up twice, $1000 each time. My husband's profession is seeing widespread lay offs. We're grateful for what we have, everyday! And we do NOT complain that we got stuck here and it hurt us seriously financially. There was no raise for us the past 2 yrs, and no raises in our future, we've been capped. There are 20,000 guys lining up for my husband's job and they'd do it for 1/3 less the pay. I can't imagine what the teacher's long list was. Its the same job they've always had. Did they detail a real financial strain or hardship because of their lack of income? I doubt it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

12:40 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Sherry, I feel for you and your family. I too had the hardship of a 60% salary downturn in business and had to pay property taxes from my retirement which now gone. I am grateful and humbled for what I have also. But I realize the 309 MILLION DEBT this School District owes and us taxpayers must pay it will only get worse not better. The bottom line is "we work for them". Yes, it is true...their union power has created us the taxpayer to be powerless. It is a great scam. The system allows them to ask for whatever and if they don't like it then threaten you with a STRIKE. Then you have a School District who has a spending addiction and uses our money like it is an ATM machine.

G.Ryan

10:51 am on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Disappointed...the bond repayment number is now approximately 305 million as some of the bonds are non-callable.so that number does vary a bit(309)(was the number prior) but this is the approximate number.I do suggest you get involve and start attending the School Board meetings and their financial meetings to stay informed. And no I am not making up figures for the sake of making up figures. And raising the tax levies is just raising taxes on us but that is what Democrats like to do raise taxes.

Reply

G.Ryan

2:52 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Disappointed..Remember it is a 2 way street. You did come after Angela and myself's comments so the attack was initiated on your side first so one has to defend oneself. I informed you of the bond repayment with the interest attachment. I spoke with Mr.McQuillian about this in the afternoon and the range is approximately $305-309 MILLION. That is as specific as one can get with that number. So these are not figures just made up but based on your comment you felt I was just coming up with numbers. I am sorry if this is not what you wanted to hear but it is the truth.

Reply

G.Ryan

3:15 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

Disappointed, Thank you. It is my understanding that the 305-309 Million is the estimated number range of the bond repayment with the total interest. So I hope that answers your question. Mr.McQuillan is the expert on that issue. Perhaps I should of presented it better and I do apologize for any misunderstandings or confusion. Take care now.

Reply

Anonymous

10:40 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012

There have been many eloquent and persuasive points made in this comment section. However, unless the BOE is actually reading the Patch, then it will not change anything. Everyone with an opinion on these important matters should email the Board of Education and let their thoughts be known. Their email address is:

board@geneva304.org

Reply

Wayne

7:54 pm on Thursday, October 18, 2012

Perfect, thanks for that email! Many of us can't attend BOE meetings due to work and fear of repercussions for our kids. Email works!

Reply

Max

2:23 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@ Dave Larson

Illinois is one of almost two dozen States that forces teachers to PAY the union even if they don't want to join the union. As a result, these teachers may decide to join in order to have a vote, even though they would prefer not to join. Even those whose religion or strong moral beliefs prevent them from formally joining a union must still pay the union, whether or not they become members.

http://www.nrtw.org/a/a_1_t.htm

Unions are undemocratic in the extreme, despite any representations to the contrary, when they use public law to facilitate coercion of money from teachers and pay raises from communities.

With all the talk about unfair advantage to corporations, it's time to consider the way federal and state governments protect unions from having to compete fairly in the market place. And there is no more troublesome example of government/union conniving than in the case of public employee unions.

It may be impossible to make a chicken/egg determination WRT corrupt legislators vs corrupt unions, but why bother? The connections are obvious, and if we fry one we'll be a lot closer to cracking the other.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Fortune

2:43 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

No they don't Max...It's called "fair share". They don't ahve to be a member. If they don't agree with money being sent to a particular area, all they have to do is ask that their money for that area go to a charity of their choice....

Comment_arrow

Myra

3:49 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Tom, you have -0- credibility.

Comment_arrow

Max

4:55 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

@ Tom F.,

Teachers still have to put out money in an amount determined by what the union claims, and in very rare instances could be called upon to substantiate, are its representation costs.

You claim that there are at least two teachers in D-304 who have the courage and commitment to take a principled stand against union membership. You agree, I believe, that these teachers are either paying union costs, or they are contributing a like amount to an approved charity.

Even these concessions ignore difficulties attending a teacher's setting himself up for ostracism by union members for taking such a principled stand. And, following either choice still results in remaining in circumstances where a loss of income is attended by the surrender of his ability to improve his earning power by exceeding the accomplishments of his peers.

Where is either the justice for the individual, or the advantage to the community, in allowing unions to control education? I don't see it. And I won't vote for it.

D-304 has got its last "yes" vote from me on any additional tax issue which may in the future be placed before the voters. When the debt is paid and the budget is balanced at a reasonable level of taxation, then I will be happy to consider reinstatement of my willing support for the D-304 school system.

Comment_arrow

Tom Fortune

5:17 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Myra...why? Do you know more about teacher's unions?

Comment_arrow

Myra

6:04 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Tom, you seem to throw around all sort of unsubstantiated 'facts'. McQuillan called you out on your claim that the board contributes 9.4% to the administrators pension and you have failed to respond.

Married to a teacher

3:06 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Hmmmm. Don't have to be a member but still has to pay but they can ask for the money to go to a chairty of their choice. That sounds really fair - you are going to pay period!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Fortune

5:19 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

Married to a teacher~
The reason why you have to pay fair share is because the teachers that are not actual members benefit from the work that the union does.

Max

10:18 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

No Tom, teachers don't necessarily always "benefit" from the work the union does, except by the union's own self-serving interpretation. What does happen is that the good teachers are limited by their union. We will see just how badly all D-304 teachers will be inconvenienced, embarrassed and disadvantaged by their union's actions in the next three weeks.

I hope for D-304 teachers' sake that the GEA/IEA will do the right thing.

Reply

Ron Procire

3:58 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012

Hey, how about the janitor (sorry, I mean custodial engineer) that makes $106 a year?
it's all on geneva304.org - it's entitlement gone wild (joe francis not included)

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how