- Local every day in
Geneva Teachers Expected to Picket Before Tuesday School Board Meeting: Reports
The Kane County Chronicle is reporting that representatives of the Geneva Education Association will be picketing before the 7 p.m. School Board meeting at the Coultrap facility.
The Kane County Chronicle reported at about 1:21 p.m. today (Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2012) that the Geneva Education Association is planning to picket prior to the 7 p.m. School District 304 board meeting, scheduled for 7 p.m. at the Coultrap facility.
The Chronicle story says GEA President Carol Young confirmed that the "informational picket" would take place from about 6:45 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. outside the building at 1113 Peyton St. from the Lincoln Avenue entrance to West State Street and back.
Teachers and parents who support the teachers union have spoken at recent School Board meetings, and union representatives wearing green "United We Teach" T-shirts have packed the room at School Board meetings on Aug. 27, Sept. 10 and Sept. 24.
A postcard recenlty sent by the GEA asks for support of the teachers union and lists academic accomplishments in bullet points:
- Geneva High School was ranked the #1 high school in Kane County by Chicago Magazine.
- Mill Creek Elementary was named the #1 elementary school in Kane County.
- Both Geneva middle schools were ranked in the top five middle schools in Kane County.
- 80.6 percent of Geneva teachers hold a master's degree or above.
The postcard refers supporters to a website www.gea4students.org. The website includes a YouTube video as well as tabs for accomplishments, frequently asked questions and how to help.
Some of the issues mentioned on the website include:
- Compensation
- Collaboration of teachers and administration
- Teacher Plan time
- Guidelines for special education caseload limits
- Professional development
- Procedures for involuntary transfers
- Use of surveillance cameras in the high school
- Supervision guidelines
- Progressive Discipline
The homepage of the website includes a call to action.
"We care deeply about each and every child we teach and do not want to be forced into doing anything that would impact those students’ education! Working without a contract, however, is unacceptable. The teachers expect the negotiators to work together to resolve this situation. Neither side can stonewall the negotiation process! Please let the School Board know that you want this contract settled NOW! Click on the Help tab above to find out more about what you can do to help," the website says.
John Perdikus
4:03 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
www.gea4students.org!
You should be ashamed. 4students? Really? Should be 4teachers.
Highest scores? DEMOGRAPHICS.
A challenge. Show one school district with our demographics that have bad schools.
Another challenge. Go someplace else if you don’t get a raise here. Never gonna happen. Who would leave this district? Why? DEMOGRAPHICS.
Lou B.
5:09 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Pay rates in demographically advantage districts cold actually be lower (if the market was allowed to influence rates as opposed to unions), as the problems are fewer and more teachers want to work in such areas. Geneva is a prime example of a Camelot environment.
Joe S
4:12 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I am all for paying our teachers well! They are the ones who help prepare our children for the future! Why does anyone think they shouldn't be compensated the same as the teachers in the neighboring communities?
Paul Bryant
4:25 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
We're right between St. Charles and Batavia, both geographically and on average teacher salary. How do we rate on State test scores? I haven't looked myself, but I would guess we're right on par with the neighboring communities since the GEA didn't flaunt that on their nifty postcard.
rc
4:27 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
did you ever consider Batavia and St.Charles are sitting back this year, because it is Geneva's turn to fight the fight. Next year it will be either of them saying we need to be paid more because Geneva is paid more - not that they are doing anything else to earn it.
Angela Kane
4:44 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
When teachers work 12 months a year and only get 2 weeks vacation like everyone else out here in the REAL world they'll be paid more. Until then their salaries are pretty darned good when compared to other professionals with comparable education, time on job and performance. And that tenure thing--again, out here in the REAL world employees don't have tenure. Give that up, work 12 months a year (and don't try to tell us you do because you really don't) and we'll talk about salaries. Oh ya, and those pensions and your retirement age will have to be altered to be comparable to the REAL world too.
Lou B.
5:26 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Joe, labor prices are based on supply and demand, not on 'what the neighbor is getting' unless you agree that since your neighbor is paying 300.00 to have his yard mowed each week, you would agree to pay the same amount. The argument simply does not hold up, but in the Public Sector, that is how public employees justify anything and everything... "because the guy next door is getting it."
Labor rates should be a voluntary agreement between the purchaser(s) and the seller(s) with both parties satisfied and in agreement as to the cost of services, based on supply and demand.
In this case, since there are hundreds of available teachers for most positions, why would the residents of Geneva need to pay more, just because the folks down the street are overpaying?
Kim
4:13 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
This makes me so mad! The average FAMILY income in Geneva is $77,299, yet the average single teacher income for 9 months of work is $72,305...Teachers...stop being so greedy...I'm already paying your salary, paying for degrees that you are NOT using, paying for your benefits and your retirement...yet you want MORE! Check out teacher salaries here: https://geneva304.org/district_information/PDF/2011-12_ISBE.pdf . Meanwhile the rest of us that live in the real world working year round are struggling with companies that are cutting back on jobs, raises, benefits and bonuses. I really can't believe how greedy teachers have gotten and are threatening to hurt our children by walking out on them and holding us all hostage to their demands. Why can't we just get a fresh group of teachers to come in and use the same lesson plans that these teachers have been using over and over for years.
Lou B.
5:12 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Frightening to realize that individuals as out of touch with their fellow man, the economy, the facts behind what produces good educational outcomes, etc, as Geneva teachers are... are the ones who are 'educating' our children.
Joe S
4:16 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Kim, sounds like you are the Greedy one! Do you have children that attend Geneva schools?
sam
5:44 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Joe, Kims got it right and they are not working without a contract they are just working off an old contract. Most companies have not given out raises in years. Nor do they pay for higher education and if you asked for one they'd give you the one finger salute and can your butt!
Terry Flanagan
4:16 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
In the interest of information, Geneva High School is on Academic Early Warning Status meaning they did not meet AYP for two years and are eligible for state sanctions according to the Illinois Interactive Report Card at http://iirc.niu.edu/SearchResult.aspx?SearchText=304&type=DISTRICT. I realize that AYP requirements and measurements are open to debate, but we should look at all of the information if we want to evaluate our schools' performance.
Leslie Juby
4:40 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Terry,
Every school in Illinois with a sub group will eventually be on Academic Early Warning Status due to No Child Left Behind. It is important to see which group falls in AEWS before evaluating school's performance.
Terry Flanagan
5:01 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Leslie,
That would be a topic worth pursuing. Why, for example, did the Middle School South fail to make AYP while Middle School North did make AYP? The district probably needs to issue its own report card in response to the state report card to explain why individual schools did not meet the standards. We can't really point to high ratings in Chicago Magazine, which does a good job ranking restaurants, as the consummate measure of a school district's performance. We have to consider and at least explain state ratings.
Paul Bryant
4:20 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
At least with these leaks from the GEA, we're getting some idea of what's going on in the "confidential" negoiations.
We now know a moderator is involved per Ms. Youngs foray into YouTube, and from previous leaks, we can reasonably assume a salary freeze was in the contract offer from the school board.
If the GEA members are willing to picket school board meetings, it can only be a matter of time before an impasse is declared and a strike vote taken.
Based on that postcard, does anyone else get the feeling the "informational picket" may be just a little slanted to one sides information?
James
4:20 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Let teachers quit. Then we can bring in young people who actually care about our kids future and not about how much money they can suck out of the system for themselves. It's gotta stop, we can't afford it.
Lou B.
5:12 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Here here!
Anne
5:45 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Well said!
Jim J
4:22 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Wow. What an ungrateful lot these union representatives and members (teachers) are. Either that or they are a bunch of ostriches with their heads so deeply in the sand they have missed the last three years (and more) of economic turmoil.
Let's pick a color and wear it in support of the (apparent) conservative tact (finally) being taken by the school board in these negotiations.
Don't let this public service union bully you into a another bad teeacher contract.
Jim J
Ken Schuman
4:45 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I am all for paying good teachers more money. However, not at the expense of keeping mediocre teachers. A good teacher should want a merit raise because they are better than the one in the next room that hasn't changed the lesson plan in 5 years. Just because you show up for another year does not necessarily make you a better teacher or a better anything!
Greg H
9:53 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Spot on! Maybe the Geneva School Board should start a charter school where teachers are measured and rewarded on individual performance and the outcome of the educational progress of their students. In the private sector, I have to go through annual performance reviews and am held accountable for my achievements against stretch performance objectives. Rest assured, mediocre performance does not achieve a guaranteed pay increase.
Joe S
5:13 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I am sure if there was a fair way to evaluate the teachers and let them get paid for "performance" they would support that vs. Tenure. That way we could keep good teachers and get rid of the ones that rely on Tenure rather than results.
Max
8:42 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Yes, talk to the GEA/IEA/NEA about developing that "fair" plan. You'll get your eyes opened in a hurry. No union will agree to such a plan unless it has no other choice.
Perhaps you noticed that the GEA Talk-er, Carol Young, continues to spread the untruth that the teachers are working without contract provisions in force. The contract has not disappeared, it has simply become "amendable". She also has the sheer gall to claim that "the school district can afford modest raises." This statement alone shows that the GEA's position is based on lies. In light of the already huge debt and ever-rising property taxes which Geneva families will continue to experience, the greed motivating such a statement is shocking.
Ms Young's statement has proved, if any doubt remained, that the GEA is insensitive, selfish and completely without regard either for the community its members supposedly serve, or for the truth.
rc
9:30 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Mrs Young is also pulling down $83,000 annually teaching kindergarten children, and needs to be compensated more because surrounding teachers are being paid more, not that we're getting anything for the additional cost. Call their bluff - where are they going to go?
YOUNG, CAROL L Teacher KINDERGARTEN $83,302
http://webapps.isbe.net/aarp/AdHocReport.aspx
CGeneva72
1:20 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Can someone tell me what school Mrs.Young teaches at?
OutSpoken1
12:01 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Is Carol Young on the budget committee???? I didn't know the district had a surplus. She says the "school district can afford modest raises..." Where does she think that money comes from?
Bell
10:04 am on Friday, October 12, 2012
It's a small emergency fund. Like a kid who finds 10 bucks in the cookie jar and demands a raise in his allowance even though Daddy lost his job and they have 15,000 in credit card debt.
Wes
5:24 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Hold strong, Board - don't let the Union intimidate you. You have the overwhelming support of the community behind you who appreciates the fact that you're trying to keep the contract based in reality.
G.Ryan
10:00 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
CGeneva72 she teaches kindergarten at the Harrison street School in Geneva...thanks
btown95
5:26 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Angela, you are so misinformed. If teaching is as easy as you say, go ahead and give it a try, nobody is stopping you or anyone else from being a teacher.
Max
8:59 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
The door swings both ways, btown95.
No one is stopping Geneva teachers from seeking greener pastures.
Michail Gomberg
9:59 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
This is simply not true. I've discussed this very point with several Illinois teachers and even though it may not be fully representative, in every case the teachers were loathe to leave the profession for any reason because it is very difficult to get back in. The difficulty seems to stem from the fact that there are many more applicants then there are positions to fill. I really have to ask myself why this would be the case when the teaching profession is so underpaid and under appreciated. Either teachers collectively are the most altruistic professionals short of Buddhist monks or there is another explanation. As for using emotional arguments about bringing up our kids, the future or the difficulty of the profession, please, we are talking about budgets and salaries. Since when are these discussions about emotions. As Bill Clinton wisely said, it's about arithmetic, and arithmetic always wins in the end. The longer you wait the worse the consequences are, and before you wave a dismissive hand at the fuzzy math, look around you and witness the communities that have had to disband their police forces due to the lack of funds. Maybe Geneva is not there yet but I bet the people on those communities didn't see it coming either.
G.Ryan
10:34 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
You chose teaching and all you teachers do is complain. At the School Board meeting tonight everyone of these teachers complained about the working conditions and how they should be compensated. If this is how they come across in a meeting, I wonder what they tell their students and what they teach them for that matter. Let the Greedy Teachers go it seems alot of them don't even reside in Geneva.
Avett Green
4:05 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012
I am soooooo tired of hearing hard teaching is!!! Yes, and so are my THREE jobs that I work at to get the bills paid. EVERYBODY'S jobs are hard at one time or another, HELLO! We ALL get tired and stressed and overworked, blah blah blah, but the majority of the work force does not stand around and whine about not getting their due RESPECT. Teachers, you are not any more special or work any harder than other staff employees in a school, but I don't hear janitors, administrators, secretaries, bus drivers, cafeteria workers, counselors, school nurses, etc, demanding a BIG daily pat on the back ($$$) from the community. When you went to college for your teaching degree, did you not realize you would be working with children who would try your patience every single day? Did not realize you would be helping with extracurricular activities? Did you not realize you would be grading papers at home some evenings? If you didn't, then your professors failed to teach you what to expect.
Wes
5:35 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Does anyone know if the teachers are taking their discontent into the classrooms with shirts, buttons, etc?
ConcernedParent
9:01 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Yes! The teachers at my children's school have been wearing their green t-shirts and buttons in the classroom frequently.
Sandy
9:36 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
That's really unprofessional. If they really care about kids and education, leave the distractions out of the classroom.
Anne
8:48 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Yes - the teachers wear all their green. Don't decorate the halls - not to mention they have an attitude now. The atmosphere is different and not in a good way.
Angela Kane
5:42 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
If you notice, I have used my actual name--unlike you. I am not misinformed my friend. On this I have (as they say) "streed cred."
btown95
10:55 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
sorry Angela, you have no "street cred"
Joe S
5:46 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Jim, I am not saying they should get paid the same as other communities, what I am saying is we need to compensate our teachers for what they do! They have a huge responsibility to educate our children, and we should never skimp when it comes to providing the best for the children of Geneva. The teachers that don't perform should be fired we must demand that we get the best, and like any thing you get what you pay for! If anyone thinks a teachers job is easy they should try it!
Wes
5:55 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
But Joe - what about neonatal ICU nurses? Don't they have a huge responsibility, too? Should we skimp when providing the best possible care for ill newborn babies? Is it fair that ICU nurses should be subject to salary freezes and benefit reductions?
Maybe they also need a union so they can picket and demand to be immune from economic downturn. (I don't think they would, though - those are people who genuinely care about children)
Joe S
6:04 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Wes REALLY!! I believe you are talking apples and oranges!! Of course if the Neonatal nurses are good and perform their job well then they should be paid well! It really has nothing to do with the Union our school board needs to be open minded. Until we actually see both sides of this debate none of us are really qualified to judge! I want my taxes to go to important things like Education! If everyone fears tax hikes maybe they should consider that have great schools helps everyone's property values!
Wes
6:14 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
It has EVERYTHING to do with the Union, Joe. Make no mistake.
Joe S
6:17 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Wes, there are two sides here and we need to see what is asked and what is being offered.
Wes
6:30 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Joe, I'm assuming the Union wants something more than a salary freeze. Never mind their last contracts were very generous and this may be the first time the Board is attempting some semblance of fiscal responsibility.
At any rate, please take 4 minutes to watch this and you'll see an interesting perspective on teacher's unions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVyNlJUKgug
G.Ryan
10:37 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Joe, you show me your quantitative analysis study that correlates data that paying teachers more money improves the quality of education. Your entitlement attitude is getting old.
Greg H
6:08 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Parents and the community have the responsibility for finding the best teachers. The best way to do that is to create a merit based rating system for retaining teachers. The best corporations in the world value education and personnel development but with that development comes an expectations for continuous improvement. The current seniority based tenure system accomplishes none of that.
Rick Bouchard
5:50 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Paul Bryant: The fact that a mediator is involved is public information. Perhaps you were not availed of that information, but it is public.
I am not going to pretend that I agree to the letter with the teachers' union's official position. However, I am inclined to lean toward their side. Many of the anti-union commenters on here really seem to have a true feeling of derision toward teachers in this district and teachers in general. It would seem that many of you expect them to shut up -- act professionally, as some of you have basically said -- yet you refuse to hear in favor of them being compensated as if they are professionals. Although there are some worms in the organization, as there are in most, Geneva teachers tend to be top-rate, in my opinion. I graduated from the high school with the class of 2009 and am currently a first-year graduate student at a leading institution in my field. Occasionally these days, I look back to my undergraduate preparation, but, more often, I look back to the excellent education that I received at Geneva Community High School.
There is little doubt that the school district has some serious fiscal problems facing it down. These problems are not the fault of the teachers but, rather, the leadership of the school district -- the school board and the administration. Most members of the latter, incidentally, have received generous raises most years lately, with scant complaints from the dais, as it were.
Michail Gomberg
10:24 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Rick,
Well phrased argument, but as the saying goes you have to walk in someones shoes. At some point in your upcoming adult life you will have the joyous experience of having to write some very big checks to the taxing bodies. Hopefully your top tier education will make that a painless act but you may also find that you will have occasion to weigh whether you can or even should afford to stay in a particular community. As for your point about placing the blame, as I remember from the mailings in the years past, the teachers union was 100% behind the board when it was time to issue bonds and build up a huge debt. My how quickly have the tables turned. It seems to me though that the union should be pointing it's disapproving finger squarely in the mirror.
Mitch
7:59 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Does this mean no school till a deal is finalized?
Dwight Swartwood
8:57 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
It may be better to be seen working at McDonalds than seen picketing a school board meeting.
The accepted "bell curve" on employee performance is approximately: 20% are above average, 20% are below average and 60% are average. All really good non-union companies get rid of the bottom performers and try to find a way to financially recognize top performers. The 60% in-between are usually safe, but may only receive minimum increases until they improve. Even McDonalds uses a similar system.
But a union puts everyone on the same level. Once you have tenure, you only have to put in more time. The more time the bigger the pay, and the bigger the pension. Geneva does have some really great teachers. Although they may be pressured to go along, I doubt really good teachers are happy with the union system.
The only way to be an excellent company is to reward excellence.
Greg H
10:35 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
While I have been generally pleased with the quality of the teachers in Geneva, I have also seen top notch teachers let go because seniority protected mediocre teachers. If the school system could adopt the HR best practices used by America's best and most admired corporations without the encumberance of seniority, we could retain the talent that is currently being lost. A lack of competition breeds complacency. It is true in business, sports and nature. Cleaning out the bottom 20% as mentioned above would create the right amount of healthy competition to keep the education environment vibrant and rewarding for students and teachers alike.
Max
9:08 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Not yet. But it would mean "no pay", if the GEA walks -- unless theBoard is as completely spineless as some fear, and winds up paying teachers for the days they are on the street. That's possible -- it has happened in other negotiations.
However, the D-304 board does seem finally to have realized that they have an obligation to protect the tax-payers. At least that is the impression they seem to want to leave. We'll see whether or not it is just posturing.
Steph Gilbert
9:22 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Can they wait until FOOTBALL season is over with! OMG!
Michail Gomberg
9:36 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Having two kids of my own in the 304 school system I know that the teachers are top notch and should be compensated well. Having said that I also believe that ultimately in any responsible organization the expenses must be driven by revenues. I've worked in several startups, a government lab and a large private firm. In all cases, in non-taxing bodies, the salaries were driven purely by how much money is brought in. In good times everyone benefits and when times are tough there are layoffs, salary freezes and salary cuts. The teachers union often brings up the argument that their members should be compensated on performance just as their non-unionized counterparts in the private sector are. However in many cases even top performers in the private sector have to make sacrifices for the good of the company. This is the dilemma that we find ourselves in. We can cast blame wherever we want, but the reality is that the Geneva budget is stretched due to shrinking property tax revenues, lower commercial tax receipts and a swollen debt load acquired in collaboration and with full support of the teachers union. Asking for a raise now is both unfair and disingenuous. Incidentally the argument that Geneva educators should be compensated in line with the neighboring communities fails the reality check. I too was surprised that St. Charles schools outrank Geneva by a large margin in the Illinois HS rankings. Check out US News rankings for too see where we rank.
ConcernedParent
9:55 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
A lot of the rankings and test scores the union is using to promote their cause reflect on the demographics of the students and the involvement of their highly educated parents. Our teachers are wonderful, but they teach in Camelot. If these teachers were working in a district such as Elgin or Aurora, they wouldn't be able to claim the great rankings because highly educated parents and higher socio-economic demographics always influence test scores and the student's ability to succeed.
As a former teacher I really understand how hard the teachers work. However, we live in a different economy with an unemployment rate of over 8%. There are literally thousands of unemployed teachers who would love to work. The union should recognize how fortunate their members have a job with great pay and benefits in this economy. How many of the families in this district have lost jobs, lost homes, taking huge paycuts in salaries and benefits in the past few years? Far too many. Families everywhere are suffering dramatically in this economy yet the teachers demand "respect" via a pay increase. It is insulting to all of us who live in the real world and have made dramatic sacrifices in this economy.
Rich Hayhurst
10:07 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
My spouse who has her doctorate in education state that it is illegal for teachers to wear any kind of political propaganda in the classroom and that employees of 304 are to remain totally neutral.
Sandy
10:11 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
I thought the wearing of the green shirts was unprofessional at best - interesting that it's actually illegal.
Rick Bouchard
10:33 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
The issue of professionalism aside -- I won't comment on that here -- that surprises me a little.
Annabella
10:49 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012
At the "Number #1 Elementary School in Kane County" many of the teachers have been wearing the green shirts and buttons since the first day of school. Seriously, the sour expressions and unhappy demeanor of the staff on a daily basis has been unpleasant but the green buttons and shirts is going too far.
G.Ryan
10:51 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Eunice, wearing those green greedy T-shirts symbolized their Union affiliation. It has now become their new "teacher's uniform." Since when have you become an attorney?
Bob McQuillan
1:08 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Prior to tonight's regular board of education meeting, the finance committee met. There were 5 people in the audience, including two board members not on the finance committee.
The agenda included a first look at the tax levy for 2012. The levy can increase as much as 3%, not including debt service repayment. The final presentation will be made to the entire board of education on November 9th with a vote taken in early December. This levy is what determines your property taxes payable in June & September 2013.
As per the Asst. Superintendent of Finance, listed below are the school tax increases on a Geneva home valued at $288,000:
3% tax levy results in a $543 increase
1.5% tax levy results in a $474 increase
0% tax levy results in a $405 increase
While these are preliminary numbers, because of the decline in total District Equalized Assessed Value, school taxes will increase in 2013.
The Geneva School District is not in a good financial position as this year's budget has a deficit of $4 million. The District is on record calling this a planned deficit because of some capital projects included in the budget. The fact of the matter remains that we are spending $4 million then we receive and that does not include a salary increase for teachers. If the teachers receive a salary increase in the first year of the new contract, those funds must be taken from the reserves. Reserves are not supposed to be used on day-to-day expenses.
When do the taxpayers get a break?
James Cullen
1:44 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
The Union Greenshirts are already 50% overpaid in total compensation, primarily because of their P-E-N-S-I-O-N-S, which are mostly paid by Illinois income tax payers under Illinois law. The facts:
1. From 2007-2012, Geneva union teachers retired at an average age of 59. Of the retirees that had taught for 25 or more partial years, the average initial annual pension was $ 83,866.
2. Because Illinois law (bought by unions from corrupt government bosses) provides for an automatic 3% increase in the pension each year, during the average 21 years of receiving pension payments the retiree will receive between $ 2 million and $ 3 million in pension.
3. By year 21 of retirement (at 80 years of age), the retiree’s annual pension payment will have almost doubled, to approximately $160,000.
Who will be victimized by this 50% overpayment 11 to 21 years from now? Today’s students. Children, can you say, “child fiscal abuse”?
Double whammy child fiscal abuse: (1) crushing property taxes and (2) a coming avalanche of much higher Illinois income taxes.
Greg H
6:22 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
In the 20+ years I have been in the private sector workforce, I have had to make a financial contribution to my healthcare costs, fund my own retirement via a 401K (pensions are a rarity these days) and undergo annual performance evaluations to EARN a pay increase.
The teachers by comparison, want free healthcare, get a government backed pension, and get a guaranteed job for life after tenure with summers off. And don't let the propaganda fool you, the majority are not doing the summer work on their own time.
Bottom line is the teachers are asking for more of what the rest of us do not have in terms of compensation. If the teachers want more then they need to earn it via individual merit.
TJ
7:50 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
With the exception of 2 or 3 math/science teachers at GHS - NONE of the Greenshirts would be able to earn anything close to their salaries in the private sector, IMO.
Don't believe me? Give it a try!
Rosie
8:07 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
I do believe the teachers in our community are great (most of them) but we can not hold them soley responsible for the successes in our childrens academic life!! They teach in a community where the children come to school every day bellies full, nice clothes, IPhone in hand...Not much stress in these youngsters life..After school they go home to at least one parent on their butts to get homework done, helping with projects, quizzing for test...most parents I know spend just as much time on homework as the kids!! Kinda makes it easy to be a Geneva Teacher!!
marsha engle
8:27 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
My daughter is a senior at GHS. We have had some teachers throughout the years that were outstanding. I would double their salaries. They should be paid like brain surgeons. At the same time, we have had some teachers that were terrible. They should be fired. It is no secret who the "greats" are and who the "bad" ones are. Tenure protects teachers that should not be in this profession.
Fun with Numbers
8:46 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
In mid-August the GEA was very concerned about the students of CUSD 304. So much so, that they registered the following domain
Domain ID:D166369378-LROR
Domain Name:GEA4STUDENTS.ORG
Created On:17-Aug-2012 15:20:17 UTC
Last Updated On:17-Aug-2012 15:20:19 UTC
Expiration Date:17-Aug-2013 15:20:17 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Tucows Inc. (R11-LROR)
I wonder when the green shirts and buttons were ordered, and if they have settled with the trademark owner of United We Teach?
Isn’t it gratifying to know that 70% of your real estate payment funds CUSD 304, and the GEA dues paid by the teacher? Those same union dues are then reshaped into propaganda as evidenced by the shirts, buttons, mass mailing direct mail, PR communications, web development and social media designed to further extort taxpayer dollars.
If the GEA thinks that it has political capital in Geneva, they should spend it now. It would be in poor taste to have the giant scab rat on 4th street as counter programming to the Kris Kringle house on Third Street come early December.
http://instagram.com/p/PdeJ6thrbS/
CGeneva72
11:39 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
I was wondering how much it costs to mail out those postcards and maintain that website? And now I am thinking about how much it costs for those green shirts and button guys...I hope that they ordered them through a Union Labor T-Shirt Maker...OH WAIT...no such silly thing exists.
G.Ryan
11:54 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Well, CGeneva72 since us taxpayers fund their salaries and they pay union dues guess what? We the taxpayers are paying for it and it is being used against us. And I just found out that the Union representative who is a kindergarten teacher who teaches an approximate 3.5 hrs a day is allowed to take time out for her union festivities(her salary is $83,302) and we pay a substitute teacher while she steers up her union rhetoric. So in essence, she gets paid her professional rate pay salary while we pay a substitute teacher in addition to her salary while she plays UNION CHIEF steering up the TROOPS!(teachers) What a gig, all expenses paid by the taxpayers!
Melissa
9:58 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Our 7th grader came home from school yesterday and said she wished that they too could wear tee shirts that said "we see you and your green shirts and buttons everywhere and it makes us feel like all you care about is more money". While that may seem like too much to fit on a tee shirt, it shows that the kids are keenly aware of the teacher's ongoing need to sport their union flare, despite how in might make the kids feel. We have 2 kids who have already graduated from Geneva and let's tell it like it is: There are some excellent teachers. They are the minority. It's too bad there is a no-fire rule in the contract. It would be a great way to "clean the slate". Let the teachers go and find another job in this economy. I think there would be a lot of teachers with a lot of time to watch their "beloved Bears". Geneva School Board, please stay strong and do what you know is the right thing for the citizens of Geneva!
McDole Drendel
1:18 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
It has come to my attention that there are comments being made by someone who has the exact same name as me. I am the Andy Drendel who teaches in the Kaneland School District and I am not the one who has left any comments on here about it. I've never even visited this site before today and I've never left any comments regarding anything that has to do with the Geneva School District or the School Board. I do not appreciate the comments that have been made regarding my career in teaching or my salary (which I know isn't a whole lot). Please respect my privacy and understand that anyone posting under the moniker "AndyDrendel" is not me. Thank you
Matt L
10:54 pm on Wednesday, October 10, 2012
As a senior at GHS, it is really embarrassing to see all you parents bicker at each other. And to those who are saying our teachers have an easy job, that is completely wrong. They put up with so much trying to educate and lead students into the right direction. The teachers at GHS care so much about students like me and shame on all of you who said otherwise.
Lou B.
9:40 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Matt, the primary issue is not, "are the teachers caring, and hard working."
When you go out and purchase something, you evaluate the cost, relative to the benefit. In the labor market, there are well established methodologies to establish the cost of human resources. Local residents contributed hundreds of millions of dollars in labor costs during your four years in high school. Wage rates are not small issue. Geneva residents who are asked to pay the teacher's inflated salaries have seen significant declines in their own incomes.
There is very little statistical correlation price paid per teacher to quality of education. In fact, the quality of the community, crime rates, parental education levels, college expectations, class size, truancy rates, native iq, parental involvement, etc. all factor to a greater extent into the quality of the educational experience. Chicago teachers make more $$, and yet their outcomes are abysmal.
There are thousands of young people who, upon graduating from college, would love to bring their enthusiasm to the teaching profession. Unfortunately, you and your friends will be locked out of job opportunities by the very Teachers Union that does not value quality of service, but instead rewards longevity of service.
Mort
10:11 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Matt - the issue of 'it's a hard job' and 'they care so much' is a smokescreen. That's probably true, but it's irrelevant.
It boils down to spending us deeper and deeper in a hole
I imagine the Greenshirted teachers have you as a captive audience to make their case in the classroom, but try to read the very clear responses form those who see the need for some fiscal responsibility.
Greg H
7:13 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012
Matt,
The problem is simple economics. The demand for education is very inelastic. The supply of teachers is very elastic in this area. The union creates artificial inelasticity of supply by protecting the teachers with seniority and "no fire" clauses. This creates an artificially high price point for teachers salaries (the intersection of supply and demand). When you compound this fact with a pay and incentive program that rewards time in position over results of employee, you end up with too many overpaid, under achievers clogging the labor pool. I am not saying that every teacher in Geneva is an underachiever but there certainly 1-2 teachers in every school that are biding their time under the protection of tenure to get to retirement (the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow).
The issue at hand is that the teachers salaries are at an artificially high price point and they are looking to take that price point higher in the face of current economic conditions. If the labor market for teachers was allowed to operate efficiently, you would actually get better teachers who were more caring than the ones you have today at the same or better price than what we have today.
Ellie
9:02 am on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Matt, as a senior you should be old enough to listen to and understand that there are at least two sides to every story. "You're embarrassing me," is not a very informed understanding of the situation. You are old enough to understand that sometimes when people have said "no" to you, it has been for your own good. You are old enough to understand that in real life, people must budget. They must choose between wants and needs. Right now, you idolize your teachers. For good or bad, they seem to hold your future in their hands, but like your parents, they are not perfect. After high school, they will matter less and less. Your success or failure will depend on you. Teachers can be and should be told "no" this time. We can't afford to give them a raise right now just because they demand it. What good is a beautiful town like Geneva if the taxes are so high that you will never be able to afford to live here after college, unless you live in your parents' basement?
Matt L
12:56 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012
If you read my comment carefully, I made no stance on the subject. I have not read up enough or researched enough to make a stand on the topic. However, I have read many hateful comments regarding this whole situation. I was only trying to make a point to those who are saying that the teachers do not work hard and are selfish. Those comments are simply not true. I was in no way saying that their care and hard work were the primary issues. I am merely saying that hateful comments are truly a shame.
Bob McQuillan
4:07 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012
Matt
If you are a senior, I applaud you for writing your comment. The vast majority of Geneva residents know that teachers work hard. If you read the background stories you will realize that this is about two issues
1. Over the last 5 years, assessed values on homes have fallen. School taxes are based on assessed value and the budget the district requests. The district budgets have continued to increase, thus school property taxes continue to increase in a falling market. This will continue for at least three more years because of the way assessed value is calculated. The teachers didn't cause the market crash nor did the homeowners. Yet, because property taxes contribute @ 80% of the district's revenue, we can't ignore the situation.
2. Over the last 10 years, the community has approved many new school buildings. Just recently, it was uncovered that an experts enrollment projections were inflated without informing the community. We have extra space everywhere except the high school. Our debt for all this building is $309 million and is scheduled to be paid back by 2027. We now pay @$16.1 million a year in debt service repayments. That number will jump to $25 million by 2019. This community can not repay the debt as it is currently structured.
The teachers are demanding yearly salary increases just for working another year. We can't afford these yearly increases. This is a finance issue and has nothing to do with the quality of your teachers.