Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

Geneva School Board's 'Final Offer' Made Public

In the document submitted Oct. 19, the School Board calls for a salary freeze in 2012-13, a 1.4 percent increase plus lane movement in 2014-15 and a 2.65 percent step increase in 2014-15.

 

School District 304's "final offer" issued a week ago and published today (Friday, Oct. 26) calls for a hard freeze during the first year of a three-year contact and an enhanced, pre-retirement salary hike that could incent more teachers to take that option during the next three years.

According to the document published Friday on the district's "negotiations webpage," teachers would continue to receive the same salary paid in 2011-12, with no cost-of-living increase, no 2.65 percent step increase and no opportunity for a "lane" salary increase payment this school year for completing courses in an advanced degree.

The board offer includes a $500 one-time, non-recurring stipend for those teachers who would qualify for lane movement.

Under the previous contract, teachers received a 2.65 percent salary increase for each eight hours of coursework completed toward a master's degree and a salary increase of more than 5 percent for coursework completed between a master's and doctorate.

"The board is mindful that this salary proposal is less than has been offered in prior years," School Board President Mark Grosso said in the text of the 25-page document. "It is a reflection of the fiscal challenges we face as a public school district.

"It is also a reflection of the sacrifice other employee groups within the district have been asked to make in the last several years. Every other district employee group has taken a salary freeze. We now ask the same of our teachers."

The board said teachers in some neighboring districts—including St. Charles—accepted a one-year pay freeze, something Geneva teachers were not asked to do during the previous three-year contract.

The Geneva Education Association's final offer, also submitted on Oct. 19, calls for a 1 percent pay increase, keeping the 2.65 percent step increase and no lane limitations during the 2012-13 school year.

For the 2013-14 school year, the board's "final offer" was a 1.40 percent salary increase with no step movement. However, teachers who qualify for lane movement could move as many as three lanes across the salary schedule. 

The GEA final offer seeks the same as its first-year request: a 3.65 percent salary increase—1 percent salary increase plus a 2.65 percent step increase—and no lane limitations.

For 2014-15, the board proposed a step increase of 2.65 percent for all teachers but a zero percent cost-of-living increase. Teachers who qualify for lane movement would be allowed to move one lane.

The GEA's Oct. 19 proposal calls for a zero percent salary increase for half a year, followed by 2.65 percent salary increase for the second half of the year and no lane limits for the second half of the year. Grosso said previously that equates to a roughly a 1.3 percent annual increase in both the "step" and "lane" categories.

Another major bone of contention has been retirement benefits. The School Board's final offer includes a higher level of end-of-service salary hikes but not as high as the amount the GEA submitted in its final offer.

The School Board also clearly states its intent to "phase out" pension-padding salary bumps.

Under the previous three-year contract, teachers were eligible for a 6 percent salary hike on the year the teacher announces his or her retirement.

The GEA final offer seeks a pay increase of 6 percent or more during each of three years prior to retirement—for an overall salary increase of more than 20 percent.

Depending on when the teacher chooses to give notice, he or she would receive:

  • 2013/2014: 6 percent increase over their prior year’s salary
  • 2014/2015: increase based on the 2013/2014 average teacher salary increase
  • 2014/2015: 6 percent increase over their prior year’s salary

"These end of career salary increases will expire at the end of this contract in August 2015," the document says.

It's important to note that both "final" offers aren't final. Documents were submitted Oct. 19, prior to a six-hour Tuesday meeting between the School Board and the GEA and both sides are meeting today (Friday, Oct. 26) to continue the talks.

"We have the highest esteem, admiration, and respect for our teachers," the board says in its salary proposal rationale. "Our teachers make our School District a nurturing and challenging place for our students, a great and lasting value for our parents, and a strong and vibrant institution within our community.

"(But) charged with the responsibility of being good stewards of taxpayer money, the board is seeking a teacher contract which will not compromise the long-term solvency of the district. This is an obligation that we owe all taxpayers in our community."

Board Salary Cost Summary

The district’s salary schedule costs for 2011/2012 were $27,248,068.

Under the board's final offer, the projected costs are as follows:

  • 2012-13: $27,248,750
  • 2013-14: $27,630,233
  • 2014-15: $28,276,813

Related Articles

 

Related Topics: Geneva Education Association, Geneva School Board, and School District 304

Max

3:33 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

In reviewing the Board of Education proposal, I found it to be very liberal and generous. Probably too generous given our circumstances. If GEA/IEA-NEA are willing to strike for something even MORE generous than this, they will remove the last vestiges of sympathy which may remain in the mind of any objective resident of the District.

Geneva teachers, your union is selling you out for their own purposes. I hope that the best teachers will not lose their jobs by making the mistake of walking, but I think most of them are too smart to do that. The others ... well, the replacement list is long, with many experienced, proven teachers waiting to serve the Geneva community in place of those misguided few.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jason

4:09 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

I agree Max. The details of the Board's offer seem more than generous. I hope they stick to their guns on this one because if this is the starting "offer" with the intent to move somewhere in the middle between this and the GEA's proposal, this tax payer will not be happy about it.

Comment_arrow

Anonymous

4:26 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Well said Max.

Some teacher's spouses are now claiming they (the teachers) didn't know what the GEA was offering/negotiating/rejecting. If the teachers were truly in the dark about what the GEA was doing then that proves the point that unions are not serving their purposes anymore. If the teachers are really and truly disgusted with the GEA, they should move to dissolve the union, agree to merit pay, and get on with teaching.

I apologize if this seems rude, but I am suspicious when any teacher claims "we didn't know what the GEA was doing". Honestly, I think this will be the phrase to save face because "we didn't know" is more convenient then admitting they were greedy, selfish and wrong.

Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

4:31 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Thanks Max and Jason, I agree it is a quite liberal offer an apparent 6% increase? From what the Kane County Chronicle article stated it seems the parties plan to meet again tonight so stay tuned.

Comment_arrow

Judy

7:19 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

I agree as well. If that's not good enough then they ought to go find a job elsewhere that pays as well and offers as many benefits and the protection of a union, tenure, etc. GOOD LUCK!!

Robert Mann

3:47 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

If the Board's offer is not accepted by the GEA, then a total impasse clearly exists. The Board therefore can and should implement its last offer and declare an end to negotiations for this year. Being unburdened by a union-negotiated collective bargaining agreement, the Board not only will be able to maintain a quality education program and continue to improve that program but will be able to do so much more efficiently. The approach of the holiday season, cold weather, ready availibility of highly qualified striker-replacement personnel, the prospect of lost income and benefits and especially the richness of the Board's offer, all combine to make the threat of any strike and certainly a susptained strike, hollow.

Reply

Avett Green

4:59 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Think hard, teachers. Be careful what you demand. The taxpayers have clearly lost allegiance and patience with you. School classes can and will continue without you. You've been greedy for too long. Are you REALLY ready for the consequences of not accepting the Board's generous offer? I'd be scared if I were you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

G.Ryan

9:28 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Thanks, Ed for the insight. It reminded me of divorce proceedings when the divorcee knows you have savings(bonus) in the bank(surplus) and they think of every notion known to man to get their claws on it. Wow, this GEA and IEA are aggressive. In retrospect of this process, did they forget this is an educational institution for students to learn? It seems to be all about them(the union and the union teachers). Time for serious reform and forget this contractural process with making decisions with a third party's funds.(us taxpayers) But what can you expect, after all it is the government?

Comment_arrow

John S

2:02 pm on Saturday, October 27, 2012

I think there has been a lot of misrepresentation from both sides. I suggest the truth lye's somewhere in the middle and the mediator needs to lock both parties in a room and hammer out a deal before everyone loses. Yes a strike is bad for everyone. As taxpayer, I voted for the referendum. I understood the consequences. When both sides start to lob grenades, it will become personal and thats when our entire community will lose. Get back to the table before it is too late!

Show Me The $$

11:27 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Since I lived in Geneva I have paid $119K for Teachers Salaries and Pensions. I am in the process of calculating the average percentage increase. Do I get a school wing or classroom named after me?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal

11:32 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

Sorry - all you get is the accusation that "you don't respect teachers"

Comment_arrow

Show Me The $$

11:53 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

@Sal

I would not know anything about the teachers. My kids went to private schools. I just saw the contract portion that is in dispute and the contract seems to be written in the 1920's. Remove the corrupt union and Geneva will be a great place to live.

Show Me The $$

11:29 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012

The Teachers Corrupt Union has gotsta GO!!!!

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how