Geneva
Current Weather
- Today
- 75°
- Local every day in
Attorneys for the city of Geneva seek to dismiss a suit filed by the family of Naperville resident Randy Suchy, who drowned while rescuing a 12-year-old boy he had taken fishing on Aug. 5, 2011.
The wrongful death suit filed by the family of a man who drowned in the Fox River near the Geneva dam in 2011 returns to court Dec. 13, court documents indicate.
The city of Geneva and Geneva Park District were sued by the family of Naperville resident Randy Suchy, who drowned while rescuing a 12-year-old boy he had taken fishing on Aug. 5, 2011.
According to an article on the website of Briskman Briskman & Greenberg, the lawfirm representing the family members, the wrongful death lawsuit claimed that “the city of Geneva knew it was unsafe and potentially lethal for children and adults to be on land in close proximity to the water, and the downstream side of the Geneva dam.”
Geneva's attorneys asked a judge to dismiss the suit, according to a Daily Herald article. Court documents now indicate a hearing on a dismissal motion will be held at 9:30 a.m. Dec. 13 in Room 350 of the Kane County Judicial Center.
Suchy, who was 59, took two boys fishing at the Geneva dam, according to reports. He entered the water to save one of the 12-year-old boy, who had been caught in the undertow.
A group of Naperville bicyclists were riding through Geneva when they spotted Suchy's struggles in the water. They immediately contacted Geneva police and some made rescue attempts themselves. Geneva fire and police officials went into the water, pulled Suchy and the boy to the shore. The boy lived, Suchy could not be revived.
Suchy was later laid to rest, and the bicyclists were honored at a Geneva City Council meeting.
Suchy’s family alleged the city should be held liable for its failure to monitor the area, according to the attorney's website article, suggesting that, "while there are warning signs, the area had not been roped off."
Common Sense
5:10 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
As sad as this is....I does not warrant a law suit.
JohnOscar
6:44 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Why not sue the Army corps of engineers for allowing to much water in the river?
Jim Radecki
8:44 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Until true frivolous pleading statutes and penalties are In place these types of suits will continue. In essence it means if you sue for no good reason and the judge rules it is frivolous you pay the costs and sometimes fees. It levels the field and would control some of these types of lawsuits. These rules struggle to become law for one simple reason. Most of the lawmakers and all of the judges were or are currently lawyers. They support their trade at the expense of everyone else. You pay for it in your insurance premiums. Until and if this ever changes all you can do is note the law firms who file these suits and keep it in mind when you need future legal services.
Jon Azavedo
9:45 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
I had a bird poop on me while walking along the river. I want the city to pay for dry cleaning, the trees should be cut down so this doesn't happen again.
the city should be able to recoup it's expenses from the ambulance chasing attorneys filing this suit. That would help put an end to this nonsense.
Anthony
9:45 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
I'd sue beavers - originators of the dam model.
Donna Mead
10:44 am on Sunday, December 9, 2012
The suit should be against the drowned person for negligence in allowing a child anywhere near the a churning dam. The City saved the young mans life...
M. S. Schwarz
7:43 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
Actually, the city did NOT save the my son's life. Captain Randy Suchy was the first stage of saving my son's life, with the diver's distress signal from the water. The next person to step in and help were the bicyclists from Knox Presbyterian Church in Naperville. He was resessitated by one of the men in that group, in the water, while pulling him to shore. Before you accuse or judge, one should know the facts.
Mother of the boy.
Donna Mead
6:39 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
My apologies Ms. Schearz. Apparently the article needs correction.
"Geneva fire and police officials went into the water, pulled Suchy and the boy to the shore. "
And I do want to state the I don't demean the man who saved your son. An accident such as this can happen to anyone. I'm sure he was a good man, trying to do the right thing.
G.Ryan
12:34 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
And this will come out of every Geneva taxpayers pocket! As the tax armageddon continues. It is us taxpayers who support the Park District and the City of Geneva is it not?
Ed Bianchina
5:09 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
How about a simple rule that the loser pays the winners legal fee.
WMD
8:23 pm on Sunday, December 9, 2012
we should just rope off all rivers, lakes, ponds, pools and all public areas. better yet, why not pay to monitor these areas. let's counter sue the moron's estate for bringing kids to dam and placing the safety personel at risk. wait, family probably broke and that's why we have lawsuit. geez
Shavon Georgis
5:02 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
All of you that leave hurtful messages have NO IDEA what it feels like to lose a best friend and the best big brother any little sister could have. Randy was a very healthy active man, a Captain in the Marines and a Padi Certified diver for more than 25 yrs. I am Randy's sister and was his dive partner. My family is not looking for financial gain from this lawsuit. We want the city to post warning signs in visible areas of the damn and to have emergency equipment such as life preservers and lines that can reach people in the water allowing the person or persons in distress to grab onto. Most damns supply these life saving tools. The same day after Randy died people were fishing in the exact area unaware of the accident. The next day someone saw a father fishing in the same spot with a child under 7yr old. The area of the accident is very accessible and very popular.Anyone thats been to the damn would agree that it does not look scary nor able to have such force to pull a swimmer under to their death.My family wants the city to make necessary measures so that no other family ever experiences the horrible loss that we have. In a Town council meeting the dangers of the damn were agreed upon and safety measures were approved but never carried out. If the damn was fenced off just in that area and rescue tools available Randy may not have lost life. We realize that there is no guarantee these measures would have saved him but at least we'd know all that could have been done was.
Shavon Georgis
5:34 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Randy was also a registered nurse that worked in a brain trauma unit. He was one of the most caring individuals that always went out of his way to help someone. Randy loved life and he always looked for the positive in all situations. Our family found out after his death that he had volunteered the little spare time he had to buy prayer blankets from a Mission to bring to and to visit cancer patients at their time of need.
Randy was loved by so many that we had to have his memorial service at a Banquet Hall. I feel the loss of my brother so deeply it truly physically hurts. If we can prevent or at the very least provide all measures to ensure another life is not lost we will certainly try. If there is any money awarded from this lawsuit my family will be distributing the award to the charities that Randy held dear to his heart. I assure all those hateful people that we are not looking for personal financial gain from this. NO amount of money could replace my brother!!
RK
8:52 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Randy sounds like he was a great guy. Terrible tragedy.
But fence off the dam? Seriously?
Teresa Keenan
9:37 am on Monday, December 10, 2012
Perhaps, instead of bringing suit against the City, the family could have attended a City Council meeting and presented their concerns. I cannot believe the deceased man would have approved of this strategy. It seems from reading about him that he was an extraordinary individual who would not want to be involved in something so negative. This is a tragic situation that just keeps becoming more tragic.
Pam
12:07 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Maybe by filing this lawsuit another tragedy like this can be avoided.
And some of these comments are reprehensible. You should be ashamed.
Jon Azavedo
12:21 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
It's a DAM!!!!!! See the white water churning at it's base? Think it's a good idea to step in the water anywhere near it? We can't legislate COMMON SENSE!! I'm tired of the moron minority suing to change what used to be known as having half a brain. He was a brave man to save a child-he also should never have been in the area. Period.
Pam
12:37 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Why can't people just post their comment without calling other people names?
Even my 12 year old knows better.
mm
9:18 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Any updates on this? Was the lawsuit dismissed?
Pam
9:48 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
It looks like it goes to court on August 9.
Rappin
8:06 pm on Saturday, December 22, 2012
So the lawyers will get rich and people will contiune to be nasty..the city should post signs (and don't forget to put it in Spanish also). .Then leave the man die a hero as he obviously was. Would like to see original law suit and see if money is involved??