Geneva
Current Weather
- Today
- 48°
- Local every day in
Geneva's School Board President Mark Grosso also explains that teachers would receive a minimum of 3.65 percent salary increase in each of the first two years of the teachers union proposal.
Before contract negotiations resumed at 4 p.m. Tuesday (Oct. 23) at Geneva Middle School North, School Board President Mark Grosso explained some of the details of "step" and "lane" salary increases as well as the Geneva teachers union's "final offer" proposal to increase teacher salaries in each of the three year prior to retirement.
"The two (big issues) I see are salaries, of course, and retirement," Grosso said in a brief phone interview.
Under the present contract, teachers who choose not to take early retirement receive a 6 percent raise in their final year of service.
The Geneva Education Association is asking to increase that to 6 percent the first year, while the second- and third-year increase would be "based on the previous year’s negotiated average salary increase."
Grosso said that translates to more than 6 percent pay increase in each of the three final years prior to retirement—or more than 18 percent over those final three years.
Since pension payments are based on the final year's salary, the GEA's demand is particularly hard to swallow for a School District that's still trying to pay down a $300 million debt in principal and interest.
The GEA's final offer rationale says "comparable districts allow four years of the 6 percent salary increase."
"Pension spiking"—when compensation is inflated in the years immediately preceding retirement in order to boost pension payments—isn't illegal but it is one of the causes of underfunded pension programs and calls for reform in Illinois, California and other states.
"These increases boost the average base salary used for calculating future pension benefits," Grosso said in the District 304 press release.
Illinois has passed laws making it more difficult for employees to spike their pensions, with sanctions that include "big pension fines for just this type of thing," Grosso said.
"Many districts give more," Grosso noted. "But the state started penalizing school districts for doing it."
The Geneva Education Association's final offer seeks a 1 percent cost-of-living increase in the first two years of a three-year contract, in addition to the "step" and "lane" increases teachers presently receive.
Union leaders are proposing a freeze for the first half of the third year, but “step" and "lane” increases for the second half of the third year.
According to a press release distributed by District 304 Tuesday afternoon, each “step” increase will automatically raise a teacher’s salary by 2.65 percent in the first and second years. Similarly, “lane” movement earned for completing eight credit hours of additional coursework, will increase each salary by an additional 2.65 percent for each lane up to the master’s degree, and 5.37 percent for each lane beyond the master’s degree.
For example, under the union proposal, in year one, a teacher would receive a minimum of 2.65 percent “step” increase, plus 1 percent, for a total minimum increase of 3.65 percent. Any applicable “lane” movement leading up to the master’s degree would add 2.65 percent per lane.
A teacher with only one lane movement in the first year would receive a 6.3 percent increase in salary. If the lane movement occurred beyond the master’s degree, the teacher would receive a 9.02 percent increase in the year.
"Traditionally, a number of teachers have moved multiple lanes in a single year, resulting in even greater percentage increases," the Distrit 304 press release said.
During the third year of the GEA's final offer, the union proposes a freeze for the first half of the school year, and “step" and "lane" increases during the remaining half of the year. This equates to approximately 1.3 percent per step, and 1.3 percent per lane movement leading up to the master’s degree, or 2.7 percent after the master’s degree.
"As provided for by law, the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board will post the Board of Education’s and the GEA’s final offers on its web page on Friday, Oct. 26," the press release said.
The Board of Education will post both offers on the School District’s web page on that same day.
You can read the full GEA final offer on gea4students.org or in this related article.
Jake
6:35 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
19.1%
EnoughAlready
8:19 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
If you are in favor of fiscal responsibility and are fed up with the union tactics please email the BOE your thoughts. They absolutely read the emails.
board@geneva304.org
Jake
6:39 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Three years of 6% raises in the final 3 years before retirement compounded is 19.1%. This is more than 2 1/2 times the rate of inflation the last 3 years and more than 2.5 times the average inflation rate for the last 10 years.
Where will the money come from to pay these increases?
It sounds nice to give someone's pension an unwarranted boost, but remember it will be paid one way or another by our taxes.
Wes
7:02 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
19% pay raise during the final 3 years, that we will be paying for during the life of each teacher's pension?
Sounds like the GEA has no interest in working with the community on a reasonable solution.
Robert Jr.
7:08 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Pension Spiking sounds like something that has no integrity and is self serving. Let's eliminate it now, before we go down the path of accepting business practices that are incoherent and which promote self serving interests in public employment. This is a basic violation of public trust.
In all instances of public employment, the tax payer's interests need to be the top priority.
What a teacher is able to obtain in a privately funded business is entirely up to them, and I have no problem with a private company negotiating such a deal - however none ever would.
Robert Jr.
7:20 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
A lot has come out in the past month about the practices employed by the GEA to force their ways of doing business... as those have come out, we see that not only does the GEA use threats if their ways are not followed, but they force shady deals that have no integrity and which are based on sliding around the public view- trying to hide things, and for obvious reasons.
My question to readers is this... if it has to be hidden, and if it applies only after all of the teaching has occurred for the sole reason of increasing retirement benefits - then isn't it just going around the system of retirement benefits? And how does it benefit the quality of education?
Shouldn't the issue of retirement benefits be openly understood by the people paying those benefits? And shouldn't it be based on fair, honest benefits for fair, honest earnings- not spiked earnings needed to get spiked benefits for life?
Geneva is a fair community - let's be open and honest with our employees and provide quality benefits- but let's not allow the tax payers to be treated like idiots and taken advantage of so blatantly.
Maybe in the 1950's, when these types of programs were introduced, the public did not have the information to understand the games going on... but now we do. How can we accept this type of blatant abuse of tax payer funds?
This is a racket-
Terry Flanagan
7:30 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
I guess teachers no longer want your eternal debt of gratitude, just your eternal debt.
John Perdikus
7:35 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
I thought I was outraged before Mr. Grosso's letter.
3.65% - 9% per year!
No wonder why teachers are so disliked. Shameful.
Rick Anderson
7:39 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
As taxpayers, the GEA munchkins expects us to ignore the man (Michael Madigan & Co.) behind the curtain pulling all the strings that will inevitably dump the unfunded and deficit ridden teachers pension obligations on to our local community.
Jake
1:57 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The state will probably approve a plan that moves all the future costs back to the districts responsible for spiking teacher pensions - the real cause of this mess.
True, the state hasn't paid all their share into this corrupt system, but they probably have paid their share if it were a fair and responsible pension system.
Don't forget that we as tax payers pay the state's bills... do you want to pay for the Teacher's Pension through higher state income taxes where you share in a portion of all the school districts in the state, or would you rather pay for it through higher local property taxes where as a homeowner and voter, you have a little more influence in how high the bill is?
By the way, now is the time that you have influence. Send a message to the School Board and to the Teacher's Union - "No increases until our current bills are paid!"
Traci
8:34 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
I agree with Fred. couldn't have said it better myself
EnoughAlready
8:53 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
As if the outrageous scheme for "pension spiking" is not enough, it seems that retired teachers in the district get preferential treatment for substitute positions. Apparently they cannot live on their $80,000+ a year pension, they also have to "double-dip" by taking short and long term sub assignments in the district. Given how many qualified, certified, unemployed educators would love the opportunity to work, it seems ridiculous. Greed knows no limits.
Susan
8:59 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
The GEA representatives have been lying to parents… I LOVE the teachers that we have been graced with over the years, and I KNOW my children are better students because of the wonderful work that they have been doing in the classroom. Until today I have supported our teachers 100%, and even wore Viking blue to show that support. The GEA “final offer” has changed everything.
Parents were told that teacher pay raises were already budgeted for this school year, and that all they were asking for was step and lane so that they could stay competitive with local schools and attract top candidates for new teaching positions. I now can read for myself that 1) the teachers are asking for more than just step and lane, and 2) this is about much more than just making our school district more attractive to new hires.
I am very disappointed in the way that the teachers have presented this situation to parents… It was a dishonest representation of what was really going on.
Wes
9:41 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
I'll second that, Susan. As a parent, I've always had a lot of respect for some (not all) of the teachers that my kids have been fortunate enough to have. I think back on the Parent-Teacher conferences and Back to School night and feeling pretty good that we were all on the same page.
There is no other way to look at this 'final offer' than a slap in the face of the parents who have been on your side. It was always all about the money I guess.
Jake
2:03 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
I f you want to make the district more attractive to beginning teachers, only adjust the pay at the beginning of the salary schedule. The later steps are plenty high. And, the pension spiking is institutionalized corruption.
Rich Hayhurst
12:25 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Susan, these sort of shenanigans have been the norm for as long as I have been watching the school board (2009). TaxFacts has been speaking out against these school district excesses for many years before that. Now that the GEA has exposed itself as an organization that serves only the pocketbooks of the vested few, at the expense of their fellow citizens, I hope that you and others will join us in our efforts to bring a rational analysis to the matters at hand.
Rich Hayhurst
1:23 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Pat, to clarify, individuals who formed TaxFacts in 2008 had been speaking about a range of issues at board meetings for many years prior to it's official inception.
I would certainly encourage all concerned Geneva taxpayers to visit the TaxFacts website at www.genevataxfacts.org and once there, be sure to keep up to date by signing up for the mailing list.
Here is the TaxFACTS mission statement:
Geneva TaxFACTS is a group of taxpayers whose mission is to obtain, distribute and discuss factual information from our local taxing bodies. Educating taxpayers on past, current and future decisions of these taxing boards is our main focus.
Arthur M
9:05 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
If the teacher's strike, I think I might contact the major news networks (Fox News, CNN, MSNBC) and ask them to do a segment (or at least mention) this drama on their networks. Geneva should become a nationwide symbol for the need for Education Reform (i.e Teacher Compensation and Evaluation Reforms)
Bob McQuillian ought to be interviewed by Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, etc. I think they'd be impressed. I think I might contact them specifically and ask them to do a segment on Geneva 304.
Teachers, take a pay freeze for gosh sakes. Its not much to ask, everyone else is doing it. We cannot afford to pay the high property taxes anymore!
Michail Gomberg
8:24 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Arthur,
Please don't involve Fox News or any other outside organization in this debate. This is not a political, but a budgetary issue that us Geneva's can solve ourselves. We don't need divisive personalities that have never lived here to tell us what to do.
Bob McQuillian has been doing a fantastic job with disseminating relevant information and contributing to the public dialogue. I commend and thank him for that but I wouldn't want him to comment publicly on communities that he hasn't researched any more than I would want him to comment on my household budget.
Every community is different and that is exactly the reason why we can't pay the teachers the same salary as Batavia or St. Charles. We have to live within our own means.
G.Ryan
10:04 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Michail Gomberg it is political. IEA is a legally corruptive organization who collects union teachers dues to buy and fund the Illinois Democratic Party. This has been well documented. In turn, the IEA gets their union contracts fulfilled as they are filter through the Illinois Politicians who pass them.
Michail Gomberg
11:29 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
G.Ryan, are you saying that the Geneva BOE is controlled by the Illinois Democratic Party? It is very likely and expected that the GEA is taking guidance from the IEA, however that doesn't mean that our BOE can't negotiate a contract under it's own terms. The board has widespread support from the community to negotiate a contract that is fair to the local tax payers. I don't see how state politics should play into the Geneva BOE decisions even if there is pressure from the IEA.
Jeff Muranyi
9:32 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
There is no money, offer is $0 & 0% increase. Option, fire them all and start over. The increase at retirement is INSANE.
G.Ryan
11:55 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
I do hope you are not being naive here Michail Gomberg. Perhaps you have not seen the political machine at work. The taxpayers have no say in this transaction. Taxpayers are not even allowed access to the negotations until this last final offer. Some of the Board of Education members contributed to the Super PAC to help get elected to the Board. If the Board of Education was trully an advocate for the taxpayers we would not be in this fiscal mess now would we? This is the absolute truth. The CPS, Evergreen Park, Highwood, Highland Park and Lake Forest union teachers rallied with a strike. With their political public tantrum the Board of Education gave in and quickly once again fed into the legally corruptive machine with the taxpayers funds with no questions asked. The GEA is a subsidiary of the IEA. It is all a monopolized bureaucracy.
Fun with Numbers
10:03 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
BOE - Let's get started on the open postings
http://www.teachinkane.org/vacancies.html?choosedistrict=true&applitrackclient=327
This demand is simply unconscionable!
Derek
9:12 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
So you are saying there are only 2 positions available in our school district? If that's the case, I don't think we need to raise salaries to make it more attractive to new hires. In fact, someone told me that Geneva 304 receives over 4000 applications for employment each year. I think I will throw my name in the hat if this agreement passes.
Lou Pierce
10:14 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
The chickens have come home to roost. Gaming the pension system has clearly become so pervasive that younger employees now expect to be able to benefit from the same trick when it's their turn to collect a pension. Still the cost to the taxpayers is small potatoes compared to the truly outrageous arrangements all over the state when administrators are given huge pension increases that are in no way earned. Is there any wonder people will be tempted to approve the ridiculous amendment to the Illinois Constitution in this election? It's not bad enough that complicated formulae might clutter up a document it has no place being in, but it turns a serious issue over to the control of the minority. Notice how well the U.S. Senate is functioning now that the GOP has twisted the already questionable filibuster into an unrecognizable tool for the sole purpose of bolluxing up the efforts of the majority.
I recently heard of a proposition that might be the best solution to the problem: charge the increased costs incurred in order to pay these goosed-up pensions to the local district. Now, the districts remain essentially unpenalized--while the total cost of pensions that are not paid by any career-long salary deductions are picked up by the state. Now that I would vote for. Let the local districts face the wrath, if any, of the voters.
Jake
2:11 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Lou,
When you say that the cost of Teachers Pensions are small potatoes compared to the Administrators, specifically what Administrators are you referring to?
Keep in mind that Administrators generally work year-round versus 180 days for teachers, and Administrators even if some have outrageous arrangements probably number less than 10% of the number of Teachers.
Jake
Lou Pierce
10:17 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
(Continued) Until then, all we can do is (1) encourage the school district to hold-out against the demand that the final three years be arbitrarily increased so that the pension formula doesn't cause the earned pension to be higher than the pensioner has earned and (2) vote no on the proposed amendment to the Illinois Constitution.
Lou Pierce
9:18 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Jake, I haven't done the research to be specific--all I have are general impressions. My comment was intended to highlight the difference in cost for the "routinely" spiked pensions of the teachers as opposed to the grossly spiked administrators' pensions that have been reported over the years. Forget the tiresome complaints about the teachers who work fewer class hours and "only" 180 days. Most teachers have to "work" long hours at home to prepare lesson plans, grade homework, keep records, consult with parents/guardians, etc. Their salaries, however, are based on the 180 day years (though that pay may be stretched over 12 months). If they get outside work during the summers, they are responsible for their own retirement planning to (plus a little social security) to "replace" that part of their annual income when they retire. When their teaching salaries are spiked during the last few years, the change in their actual pension is (or can be) real, but it amounts to only a small fraction of their total pension. The types of "golden parachute" extras given to retiring (or used to encourage others just to leave their jobs) are usually much larger additions to their earned pensions. It has nothing to do with full-year vs. 9-month jobs.
-continued'
Lou Pierce
9:19 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
(continued)
I don't mean to be picky, Jake, but your comment is loosely worded. My comment stated that the addition caused by the salary spike was small potatoes, not that the pensions themselves were small potatoes. Even if the number of administrators who get these large pensions bumps is small compared to the number of teachers who benefit from salary bumps during their last few years, the amounts of the administrators' increases are much larger than the relatively miniscule increments the teachers get from the salary spiking practice. The affect on the total pension cost by these administrator increases is disproportionate (maybe that's better than the "small potatoes" description of the teachers' pension increases). At the very least, a relatively small number of administrators' increases may have a more dramatic overall affect on the total than the larger number of smaller teachers' increases. That's what I meant to convey the first time.
Max
10:41 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Fire every single one of these greedy GEA'ers, and start over! No more reaching-out-in-friendship to those whose priorities run counter to those of our families.
GEA have willingly placed themselves in the hands of an aggressive State and National left-wing organization whose priorities have nothing to do with education, but have everything to do with lining their own pockets.
We have hundreds of enthusiastic well-qualified replacements awaiting the opportunity to demonstrate the difference between professionalism and greed. Let's give them the opportunity to reinvigorate our schools, and to help Geneva remain an exceptional community.
rc
11:01 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
So unrealistic - I question the integrity and education of the teachers to propose such a outrageous demand. Respect the teachers - after this? It will be hard to give them respect when they are not respecting any of thier community, or themselves. They know the funds are not there, but they don't care. Librarians making $98,000.00 a year, Kindergarten teachers working 3 hours a day making $83,000.00 (Mrs.Young). There was a time and place where unions were needed - but that has passed. Greed is not masked by your rally cry of attracting and retaining talent, or because Batavia is making more. The aged teachers driving this will be hard pressed to find another place to teach. BOE send a message - we will not be bullied!!!
Jake
1:39 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Don't forget that teachers only work 180 days in most districts. Often they work less than 7 hours those days and some of those 7 hours are used for "planning periods" and lunch. They are probably with students at most 5 hours of the day - when the students are there. I wonder what the hourly rate works out to be?
James Cullen
11:49 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Union Greenshirts retire at age 59 and get $ 2.3 million in pension after working the equivalent of 25 twelve-month years. Illinois’ children are condemned to suffer the burden of paying most of that pension, as necessarily- increased Illinois income taxes. The Overpaid-by-50% Union Greenshirts pay a small part of that pension.
The teachers’ union bosses, together with the corrupt Illinois government bosses they have paid off over the last 40+ years, cleverly set up the total compensation system in a way that most citizens would just focus on the teachers’ salaries (set by the local school district contract) and not realize the pension scam (under Illinois law) that is being perpetrated against them and their children. The teachers’ unions spent millions in payoffs to corrupt government bosses, and got billions in gigantic pensions and other special benefits in return.
“The state will have to come up with another $670 million for the teacher pension system in the next budget …… The state is paying $2.7 billion into the fund in its current budget. Without any adjustments, the state would have owed about $2.89 billion in the new budget year that begins next July 1. But the changes approved Friday increased that price tag to $3.37 billion.”
9-22-12 Chicago Tribune article by Ray Long.
“The state” will have to pay more billions for teachers’ pensions. Guess who “the state” here is.
It's all about the children.
Rick Bouchard
5:36 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
I agree that what the teachers are asking for does not mesh too well with reality. However, will you all be responding similarly when the policemen, firemen, community-college instructors, etc., ask for the same thing? Guess what? They do get the same thing! I am just playing devil's advocate.
John Perdikus
8:03 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Rick,
I have been a policeman for 30 years now. Both union & non. Never once did I see anything approaching these kinds of numbers.
Rich
6:20 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Please, let them strike! Our children can recover from a strike much more easily than from the rediculous burden that the teachers union wants to put on their financial futures.
Jason
8:54 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Hear, hear!
Julie
6:40 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
BOE-Stand tall and do not give in. We are extremely upset and cannot believe what we are reading. You simply must do the right thing for the people who live here. WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH. Thank you for being responsible.
Rick-What you write is NOT true! Please do some research of local PD and FD's. The pension structure has changed a lot and I can personally tell you that many police and firemen haven't had a raise in over 2 years. Also, not all members on particular departments are in a Union in all communities. The unions need to go! They are responsible for the majority of this HUGE mess!
Betty
6:42 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Who paid for the teachers green shirts, their picket signs, the yard signs & the mailings they had printed & paid postage to mail??? Were those being worked on while they were "on the clock". Hoping our taxes weren't paying for these too!
Lisa R
6:59 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Any news on the mediation yesterday?
Miss M.
11:32 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 24, 2012
Mark Grosso, President
Board of Education
Geneva C.U.S.D. 304
Members of the Board of Education met with the GEA and a federal mediator for almost six hours last night. It was a constructive conversation, and we agreed to meet again on October 26. We are hopeful that both parties can maintain a positive approach in the effort to reach an agreement. The Board is very appreciative of the overwhelming community support it has received in this matter and is committed to reaching a settlement that is good for students, fair to teachers, and financially responsible for taxpayers. The offer that the Board submitted to the GEA and the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board on October 19 will be posted on the IELRB website and the District’s website on Friday, October 26.
Debbie Hanson
7:05 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Regarding increasing the starting teachers' salaries to stay competitive...think about what this truly means. My daughter is a first year teacher. She received a fabulous education in Geneva schools and fabulous education from the University of Illinois. Honors graduate, 3 job offers (2 part-time) and now a full-time teacher. I'm incredibly proud but incredibly realistic. As confident as I am that she is a wonderful teacher, the fact of the matter is that there is a TREMENDOUS learning curve during that first year. I see how hard she works, I see the long hours BUT at the end of the day, she is still NEW and inexperienced!. And for this we need to pay more? Just because? She drives almost an hour to get to work, works in a district with 67% low income families, is paid quite less than Geneva but she will tell you:1) she feels she is fairly compensated, 2) she knows she has a lot to learn and 3) she is happy to have a job!! The students coming out of college these days are made aware of the challenges and changes facing the educational system as they will be shouldering the burden. Teaching is still an excellent profession but will not be as lucrative as it is today. These kids are realistic yet still passionate about teaching. Perhaps there is hope for the future after all.
Sue J
10:17 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Debbie thanks for your perspective. It is nice to hear that is not all about the money. I wish your daughter well and admire her realistic perspective.
Ted Tabour
7:28 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Are they nuts! If the School board argrees to this they are crazy. The tax burden in this district is already to high for most us. stop this and break the Unions death grip on our schools.
Michail Gomberg
7:35 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The Illinois unfunded pension liability is likely to result in either a higher retirement age or a massive push back of the liability to the local communities. The pension spiking and the step and lane are very risky under this scenario with the Geneva BOE running an operating deficit this year. The deficit is partially caused by the repayments on the school debt but those repayments will go on for years. It would be irresponsible of the BOE to take on the liability of higher salaries and benefits. The fact that other communities are doing it is irrelevant. I don't go out an buy a car just because my neighbor did. I do it when I can afford it and have the money to make the payments.
The BOE does have a surplus from previous years and I believe that the Geneva community has benefited as a whole from the quality of the education in D304. I would like to propose that a portion of that surplus should be spent as a one time bonus to the teachers in the next contract year. There should be no salary or other benefit increases until the operating budget is again at a surplus at the current levy rate. Additional bonuses should be given when the tax receipts improve and the debt is paid down. The step and lane program must be abolished and future salary increases should be negotiated directly into the contract.
Even under the best economic circumstances the Geneva tax payers and the BOE must be able to plan their future and we can't do that under yearly tax increases.
G.Ryan
10:17 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The surplus should not be used as it is taxpayers money from being overtaxed and does not need to initiate any bonuses for these union teachers. Additional bonuses? When tax receipts improve? The debt repayment is at least 15 years...not looking good till then.
Michail Gomberg
8:13 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
No one has mentioned the Fair Pay portion of the contract. The board should not give into this demand by the GEA. I can't imagine why anyone would want to pay the union dues without being a member, especially if they have moral objections to the union. This amounts to taxation of the non-union teachers without representation. The non-union teachers have no say in this matter since they are not being directly represented in the negotiation and will not get a vote on the contract.
Ed Bianchina
8:49 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Does anyone know the location of the St Charles and Batavia contract? I have searched but I can't seem to locate the actual contract text. I am trying to understand where we fit in relation to those districts and I want to compare the actual contracts.
Gary
9:00 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Why? So the tri-cities teachers can play an ever-escalating game with the taxpayers? At some point, someone is going to have to take a stand. It should be in Geneva and it should be now.
Ed Bianchina
10:01 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Definitely don't want to play that game. I am just curious it is really true, everyone says that but I would like to know if it really true. I would also like to see if they do the pension spiking thing.
Bob McQuillan
12:31 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Ed
Linked below are current copies of each district's agreement with the teachers. Both contracts are on the district's websites under Human Resource tabs. I have not read either contract so I can't compare then against Geneva.
Community knowledge is a powerful thing and Geneva certainly has come a long way in being knowledgeable about how the Geneva School District operates. That is a good thing.
http://www01.bps101.net/sites/default/files/documents/files/BEA%20NEGOTIATED%20AGREEMENT%202012-14.pdf
http://www1.d303.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Keq9YgE4h2k%3d&tabid=2900
Jason
8:51 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Unacceptable. Let 'em walk.
btown95
8:58 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Nice to know Geneva has so many experts on education. Seeing the comments made by people on here has made me look elsewhere to raise a family. Batavia and St. Charles are looking a lot better.
Paul Bryant
9:33 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
You won't be missed.
btown95
1:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Believe me, I'm glad to leave, I'll let you stay here and pay for this mess.
Michail Gomberg
1:34 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Quoted from an article about the Batavia contract.
"Even though there will be salary increases, the total compensation package for Batavia teachers is projected to decrease by 6 percent in 2012-13, according to a press release sent Friday from the district. The total compensation numbers include salary figures and any other benefits that the district agrees to pay for."
It seems that Batavia teachers have traded salary for layoffs and concessions on benefits. Salaries don't tell the full story.
Paul Bryant
1:34 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Still here? Thought you were leaving for greener pastures or was that just more bluster?
Julie
1:36 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Typical response from the teacher (btown). She is going to leave in a huff because she isn't getting what she thought she deserved. What you write isn't a threat to us, we welcome your departure. Yes, we'll attempt to pay for the mess you're partly responsible for by having your head buried in the sand by the union.
Grace F
9:42 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
BTown95 ... do you honestly think that if the Board doesn't take a strong stand with our teachers, that the same actions won't be repeated by the unions in the neighboring communities?
Kathy Zang
10:13 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
This demand is unconscionable. What a great math lesson for our children in school. Have them work out what they are going to have to pay when they are in their 30's and 40's, raising kids and trying to live in Geneva. They can hand in papers showing what they will have to pay if this ridiculous contract is approved. I feel sorry for the kids that these teachers are currently teaching.
I have kept quiet about my personal criticism of the education my children received in the Geneva schools. Other than one excellent teacher I mentioned a while ago, and several others that come to mind, I found the Geneva schools lacking.
The perfect instance is studying Shakespeare's great play Romeo and Juliet by watching the Leonardo DiCaprio film WHILE in class. I was outraged at the time. All of the kids in that class had already seen that movie. It took up 2 entire classes where the teacher didn't do anything. What about actually READING the play and then guding a discussion. You know, teach! Work sheets are the tool of the Geneva educators.
Compared to the Maryland school district we came from when my kids were 9 and 11, the Geneva schools lack imagination and the teachers are lazy. Both my now adult children state there are only a handful of decent teachers in Geneva.
This request is a farce. The teachers have not proven their worth to me for any raise at all. I say let them strike, and start the work on replacing them.
Kathy Zang
Miss M.
11:54 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
"Work sheets are the tool of the Geneva educators. Geneva schools lack imagination and the teachers are lazy."
Kathy- Thank you for your honest critique. My children are just beginning their schooling in Geneva Schools and I was surprised at the sheer number of worksheets being sent home. What happened to learning centers? Literacy based thematic units? Hands on manipulatives especially in the early grades? Where I taught these methods were standards, not exceptions. Worksheets were not the primary tool of teaching, but one of content review.
I find it interesting the the GEA is adamant about not having surveillance cameras in the high school classrooms. Kathy's explanation of laziness (watching a movie instead of reading literature) was a perfect example of why there should be cameras in the classroom.
Is it asking too much for effort and accountability from our teachers? Is it asking to much that they recognize how generously they are compensated already? Geneva BOE could be a role model to many other districts by setting a new precedent by how this fiasco is settled. I hope they do the right thing.
btown95
1:22 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
You can thank No Child Left Behind for this type of educational model. Everything is taught to the test.
Kathy Zang
3:19 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Then let's take a look at the CORE standards, and how they have been implemented across the country. I found it interesting that the TV news item about it had the teachers stating that they had to come up with their own lesson plans. Goodness, what will come next? I remember my room mate going to get her teaching degree many years ago from University of Maryland and she was constantly making up lesson plans.
Jill
10:24 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
If they strike, they will not get fired. There are laws protecting them. Did the CPS teachers get fired? no. How about Lake Forest? no.
And if you all think (hypothetically)that if Geneva teachers actually strike and get fired as a result; the new, fresh, enthustiastic replacement teachers would not one day ask for a raise and step/lane advancement!? Then I have a bridge to sell all of you fools in Brooklyn!
Sue J
10:32 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Jill we have to stop this now and set the expectations for new teachers to understand they will need to produce to get ahead, no more guaranteed increases for teaching another year, massive pensions on the backs of taxpayers, etc. All of us that work can claim that every year we work in our current positions we are more experienced. Does that equate into an automatic salary increase? No! In order for me and I suspect many others we have to up our game year after year and sometimes that doesn't even result in an increase.
Sue J
10:32 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Jill we have to stop this now and set the expectations for new teachers to understand they will need to produce to get ahead, no more guaranteed increases for teaching another year, massive pensions on the backs of taxpayers, etc. All of us that work can claim that every year we work in our current positions we are more experienced. Does that equate into an automatic salary increase? No! In order for me and I suspect many others we have to up our game year after year and sometimes that doesn't even result in an increase.
Gary
10:36 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Jill, you're right - per the Union regs they can't be fired - they can, however, be replaced. Permanently.
New teachers will (rightfully) want raises as they advance in their careers. The new compensation model will reward merit instead of longevity. In the future we won't have a second grade teacher or a drivers ed instructor earning more then the Chair of the HS Science Dept.
Do some reading, around the country the old step and lane union model is goingthe way of the dinosaur. It has to. The money just isn't there.
Jim Radecki
10:34 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The logic and facts clearly support the majority opinion of the taxpayers. The school district is far too in debt, teachers are currently more than adequately compensated and the current economic enviornment we all share does not support a compensation increase. While the anger and frustration is understandable it is a waste of enery. If the wishes of the taxpayers are going to prevail it will take action, not words, The teachers union is very good at taking action. And their trump card is a strike. Until the taxpayers are willing to do the uncomfortable things it will take to neutralize a strike then the current cycle will continue. The people who will bear the pain are students and parents. They will require the support of those not directly affected. If that sounds like war that becaus it is. It really is just that simple, not to be confused with easy. Sad
Kathy Zang
3:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Basically, we are their bosses, and we are supposed to agree to a raise or not. I have not been convinced that any raise is "deserved". The company we are attempting to run is in debt. Normally that means cutting costs, either through material, compensation, or employees.
Judy
12:42 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
This is beyond anything even close to reasonable. I happen to know a Geneva teacher who attended Geneva high school and a classmate of theirs with an accounting degree. The accountant had a significantly higher GPA in both high school and college. Both have graduate degrees and the accountant is a licensed CPA. The teacher is paid a bit over $10K (w/o extra-curricular pay) more than the accountant and receives more benefits and perks as well.
Pensions are almost unheard of in many industries today. You contribute to a plan out of your pocket through a 401K and hope for a good employer match. If you get any type of pension it’s not even close to what the GEA is proposing. And if your job performance is substandard there’s no tenure to hide behind or union to fight your battles, there is a pink slip waiting for you. That’s how the free market works, but teaching is no free market. And it’s certainly not free to those paying the bill.
I find the greediness appalling and even moreso in this economic downturn. These teachers aren’t hurting. As far as I’m concerned, I’d let them strike and replace them. In this economy there are plenty of qualified people looking for jobs who would be thankful to work for much less. A significant number of Geneva teachers are not so spectacular as to be irreplaceable. And good luck to them as they go out in search of similar pay and benefits elsewhere.
Judy
12:47 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
and as for hours. That accountant arrives at 8 am and works until 5:30. During busy season more like 65-70 hours. There are no federal holidays off, extended Christmas vacations, spring breaks, nor 2 1/2 months off each summer. If you took the two salaries and divided by the number of hours worked (even taking into account the hours teachers spend planning lessons, grading papers, etc. that teacher is making far more on an hourly basis. If I had to choose between the two i think I'd be a teacher!
someone who cares
1:24 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Maybe its time for a Geneva Citizen Walk-In. With all the complaining on here we, which I think is well deserved, us citizens could be coming up with our own contract terms that we propose to the BOE for them to push.
No contract
Current teachers get a hard freeze for 2013
Step and Lane is eliminated altogether
Each teacher sets individual objectives to obtain during the year. Reach the objectives and get a cash bonus and raise - don't reach objectives no raise, no bonus, potential performance improvement plan - termination
Each school sets a couple of objectives as well - all teachers get an additional cash bonus if school achieves targets
No tenure, no job protection.
Teachers can opt to participate in a retirement program with the school district contributing a 10% match on all money contributed, vesting immediately - no pension program
Health premiums at 75%, family included
12 sick days - no carry over - repeat NO CARRYOVER
School day increases to a full 6 1/2 hours
Starting pay = $45,000
Market determines teachers pay - i.e., limited supply of math teachers and they get more money
Hard freeze on all administrators salary and benefits -
Future raises determined by school results, economy, etc.
Miss M.
1:37 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Someone Who Cares
Great points! Have you thought about running for one of the open school board positions? There are four positions that will be open next spring and we need new candidates who will make decisions based on what is best for the community their top priority.
It would be so refreshing if a school district tried to do what was innovative rather then what is expected. There has to be a school district somewhere in this country that is implementing significant changes successfully. Geneva BOE...think outside the box and be a pioneer in this area rather then repeating the same old mistakes of previous BOE's.
someone who cares
3:20 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The Denver public school system as well as Zion Benton school district here in Illinois, just to name a few school districts, have taken this approach. The step and lane system was developed in 1921 to promote equal pay among all teachers. The problem with this thinking is that it says all teachers are equal, which even the teachers know is not realistic. Our homes are not all equal, the hours each of us work are not equal and fortunately, humans are not equal. This step and lane approach does not value a teacher's work with students who show significant growth. It values a teacher's time served in the teaching profession but not necessarily improving a student. It also values graduate work that doesn't directly correlate with better learning for students. In fact, there are studies that show advance degrees don't directly relate to being a better, more effective teacher. Unfortunately for a teacher, the same step and lane system their unions have been touting for years prevents them from changing school districts and maintaining the same pay. This shouldn't be the case. Let the market determine what a fair salary is.
If the community of Geneva can get behind one plan and sign their name to it, then and only then will change be effected. Otherwise, the BOE will present what they think is the best plan of action based on many emails, letters and phone calls that aren't shared with the public and may not have the support of the entire community.
Kathy Zang
3:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
And those "objectives" have to make sense. Eight credit hours per year and an automatic 2.6% raise? Much higher if you already have a masters degree!
Why is this schooling required or being paid for? It is a hold over from the unions making deals a long time ago. Is this extra schooling giving us (the employers) any benefit? And would the extra schooling be pursued if there was not a huge compensation for it?
As someone who has been in management, trying to keep a section of business afloat, I think the above suggestion is realistic.
Lisa
10:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Thank you! We agree!
Michail Gomberg
11:36 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
someone who cards: Sounds perfectly reasonable. I think you outlined a framework that many of the younger generation of teachers would be more than willing to entertain. I hope the community is able to rally behind suggestions like this and make them a reality.
Julie
1:28 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
I agree and would attend a meeting w/the BOE.
btown95
1:29 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Why shouldn't a teacher make more than an accountant? Is there some law that says an accountant has to make more than a teacher? I'm tired of hearing all the sob stories on here about people not getting raises. Every one of my friends who work in the private sector have received raises the past 3-4 years. I think some of you need to be concerned with the line of work you're in if you aren't getting a raise. Some on here are trying to make it look like the teaching profession is the only profession getting raises in this economy...NOT TRUE!!!!
Paul Bryant
1:37 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Haven't you left yet?
Julie
1:49 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
A more appropriate question is why are you on The Patch during school hours? I think we all know you're a teacher. Take your "friends" with you when you leave.
Judy
2:34 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
you missed the entire point. It has nothing to do with acountants vs. teachers. The accountant could have been in any other field. It was just one "real life" example illustrating that teachers have it pretty darn good. Maybe they should try a 100% commission job and see what that's like in these economic times. Produce or you make nothing and there is no one to catch your back.
I've looked at the pay scale and what the teachers make online. I know many of them and my children studied under quite a few as well. Some are worth the money they make, but others wouldn't make close to their salary competing in other careers. It would be nice to have a system where pay is commensurate with performance and results. Teaching can be an easy field to "hide" in as the results produced by any individual teacher are difficult to assess. And there is no supervisor looking over your shoulder or co-workers by your side in the classroom day after day that can supply superiors with honest information. Do teachers sit down with a direct supervisor for a performance reviews as people in most jobs do?
Well, I don't think there is much good in going further on the subject. I may be wrong, but Isense you have preconceived notions and my comments are lost on you anyway. Just two different opinions.
btown95
7:12 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Julie, when have I said I'm a teacher? I'm not, but thanks for jumping to conclusions before even asking.
Julie
5:43 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012
btown95...really? Well, then my apologies for sure! I would have bet money that you worked at Williamsburg...and there aren't many male teachers there. Again, my apologies for thinking this. Although, we are all entitled to our opinions/thoughts.
Jill
1:47 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
bbtown95: well said! If you are complaining that you didnt have a rasie in 3-5 years then you should maybe switch jobs or possibly careers. Everyone that is complaing here that teachers are paid too high and that they are greedy are just jealous, plain and simple.
Quit complaining and go back to school, get an education degree and become a teacher. Remeber the old saying , "If you cant beat em', join em" ?
Theo
1:58 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
With hundred and hundreds of aps for each teacher job opening, it's not that easy. The old 6 figure union-lifers aren't in any hurry to leave.
Kathy
7:26 pm on Friday, October 26, 2012
Jill, you are clueless as to what this is about. $300 million debt, combined with a terrible economy mean that this is not the time to be asking for more. And some of us feel that an increase in our property taxes would be detrimental to the community, both in terms of attracting new residents as well as paying higher taxes on properties that are worth less! No need to sling mud at honest, hard-working Genevans who are just trying to keep their heads above water. And regardless of what btown says, I don't know ONE professional who has had a raise in the last few years -- they have actually taken on more responsibility because of layoffs. And I know people who have been out of REAL work for 3 years! So, don't think that things aren't still hard out there for folks!
someone who cares
3:45 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Teacher's Union Expelled from School District
If the majority of the citizens of Geneva are truly upset, then propose candidates for the next BOE election in April. Read the included link.
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2012/07/06/teachers_union_expelled_from_school_district/page/full/
Increasingly, the public has had it with the private country clubs known as “public” unions.
So it should surprise no one that one county school district is fed up. And they have finally decided to boot their left-leaning union and try life and education in the 21st century.
The Douglas County School District, a suburban community south of Denver, Colorado, has decided to part ways with their teachers’ union in the absence of progress on a new contract which expired June 30th, 2012.
“The Board of Education finds and declares that the Collective Bargaining Agreements between the District and the Unions,” said the district on July 3rd in its formal resolution dissolving the bonds between the union and the district, “which had been effective from July 1, 2011 through and including June 30, 2012, are now expired and of no legal effect whatsoever.”
The dissolution between the district and the union is unprecedented and sources close to the union tell me that unions are pensively watching, worried that other districts around Colorado and the country could take the same action as Douglas County has.
Geneva community, it's time to speak up
Miss M.
4:38 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Someone Who Cares
Thank you for shedding light on what is possible by progressive, forward thinking school boards. I hope the Geneva BOE is reading.
Barky McWatchdog
5:12 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Please, folks. SHOW UP at the Board meetings. Your silence is deafening. In the last two weeks, the GEA has had numerous talking heads in the audience, fully prepped with propaganda and mis-information, touting the "poor" teachers from here to Kingdom Come. Everyone from Carol Young's neighbor to teachers and teacher's spouses. There were TWO Geneva residents at Monday's meeting who spoke eloquently and passionately against these demands but not against the teachers. If you cannot seem to show up to fight for what you believe in, then at least email board@geneva304.org and let them know of your support.
Barky McWatchdog
5:17 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Here is an interesting proposal for each of you, tonight.Copied and pasted from today's email. (Their last meeting had a grand total of 8 people there, according to a little birdie). Might be a good chance for some of you to "show your support."
All,
Reminder that there is a meeting tonight at 7pm Graham's 318 to ask Carol Young GEA president and Barb Freeman questions about the contract negotiations. This isn't pro teacher or anti board, it is about getting information and asking questions no matter how tough they are. I think it's important to know as much as possible.
I hope to see you,
someone who cares
6:16 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Sorry, Barky. Not seeing an email containing any of this wording anywhere in my inbox, junk or other area of my email account. Who was this sent by and/or where can we find this?
Julie
8:35 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
barky, you inspired me to go to Graham's 318 to see what kind of new coffee flavors they had. I can tell you that there were no more than 12 people there, not including Mr. Young, although he waited outside of the meeting room. They ordered some drinks and then had some fondue delivered to their little meeting. From what I could hear, and it wasn't much, they were talking about how other districts pay their beginning teachers more than 304 does. They also stated that there were 34 teachers that announced their retirement during the summer and I believe they said they anticipated 60 teachers that will announce their retirement next year. Hmmm...must be why they want to pad the pension fund so well. From those who attended, I would say that 80% of them were in there 20's or very early 30's. Two men attended. It was awesome to see a handful of wonderful "I love Geneva Teachers" signs on site also. I say for the next meeting, we join and ask if they would mind us just sitting in? My question is, if there are 400+ teachers in 304, where were the rest of them if they are so committed to the cause? I mean, really, it's for the children!
Ann
9:39 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Julie, I also attended the meeting this evening. It was very interesting to hear the teachers' side of this debate. Much of the information they presented was new to me. In many aspects of this negotiation I am seeing the validity of each side's perspective. I do not envy the difficult decisions facing the GEA and BOE. As a parent and citizen I fear that after all is said and done the difficulty moving forward will be repairing the relationships between the community and the educators. No doubt there will be hard feelings felt on both sides. Julieanne
Julie
9:42 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Oh, Pat, you're such a charmer! BS...it isn't anti-board/anti-taxpayer. Bringing in those signs to pass out isn't pro teacher? Ssssssuuuurrrreee. Nothing you say here affects me anyway since you lied about where you live when you first started posting. Remember? You said you lived in Batavia and just read Geneva Patch for fun...but alas...you live in Geneva. Have a great night!
Julie
10:08 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Yes, you should! Many of us "creepers" would like to meet you. Also, get yourself a grammar book! You're just upset because you got caught in your own lie. Funny, I think there are many people on my side. I take no offense to what Ann wrote and I agree very much with the fear she writes about because she is right!
Jerri
10:29 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Oh my, the Union boys are getting nasty. Don't be mad because it's over - be grateful that it happened.
Bob McQuillan
11:32 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Pat L
Don't go down the road that Tom Fortune (I'm sure a fake name) traveled by saying something that isn't true. I have never posted under any name other than my own. Do you really think that I am willing to stand up and speak in front of 200 green shirted teachers but I use a fake name on the Patch. Ask Rick Nagel to check the sign up information and e-mail addresses of those that you think I am. If you find my e-mail address associated with any name except mine, I'll donate $500 to your favorite charity. I know you won't make the same offer if all the names turn out not to be mine. I have been speaking out for more than 10 years, I have no reason to hide as many do on this site. I would suggest if you want to accuse someone of something you have proof. The more you post here the more your credibility erodes.
Jerri
10:48 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Okay, spouse of a Greenshirt, whatever - you're still sucking away at the taxpayer trough.
Angela Kane
10:51 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Ok folks, this is getting really nasty. Both sides have very deep feelings about this situation but verbal assaults are not the way to resolve anything. Taxpayers are frustrated and feel as if they are being financially reamed by the unions. Unfortunately some of the unionistas respond by accusing posters (who are vocal in their concerns) of not respecting teachers, not caring "for the children," not understanding how hard the job is or any of the many standard responses the state/national union officials train them to use. It's so frustrating to hear those same lines over and over again--it's like a UAW/SEIU/NEA broken record. How do we get past this impasse? REALITY. We love our town but we're not living in some little bubble Pollyanna world. Our school district is in debt, our state is in debt, our pension systems are sucking air, and our federal government is $16 trillion in debt. Teachers--want respect? Then respect your bosses--the taxpayers--and be part of the solution--not the problem. Admit you have had it good and now you need to back down and stop listening to the state/national unionistas and accept a freeze. You teach in a good place and make good money with good benefits. You are in nice buildings and have job security. Suck it up, smile and act grateful for a change. If you don't want to be here then leave. You are not prisoners, but us taxpayers are--prisoners of stifling debt, and we are tired of YOU disrespecting us.
Angela Kane
10:59 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
The title,of this story says it all: 18% increase in final 3 years before retirement. Wow, that's the ultimate hubris.
Angela Kane
11:28 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012
http://illinoispolicy.org/blog/blog.asp?ArticleSource=5180
582,000 people in Illinois unable to find work.
Anonymous
8:31 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012
I suspect many post anonymously because their children's teachers are very vocal about their union entitlement, their "rights", their demand for "respect". If we use our real names, there is a fear is that our children would feel a consequence for a parent disagreeing with the union.
Teachers can be wonderful, but I have also seen them be extremely unkind and humiliate children to make their point (yes I reported it to the principal, nothing was done.) Anytime I have written the BOE, I used my real name. When I post on the patch, I do not reveal my real name so that may protect my kids. This is the world we live in as parents. Both sides have a lot on the line and many will stoop to new lows to get what they want. Children seem to be expendable in the unions drive to get what it wants.
Torie
10:31 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012
BTW, today, Harrison kids were asked to wear green as a "clothing challenge" in support of Red Ribbon Week. Apparently some teachers were able to only find one "united" green shirt in their closet this morning. Interesting.
Bob McQuillan
3:23 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012
Anonymous
Your comment is spot on. All three of my children have been approached by a teacher and asked why their Dad is speaking against teachers. They where smart enough to say, I don't know you should ask him. None of their teachers ever approached him.
It is a shame that people feel they can't voice their opinion without their children bearing consequences but it does happen.
Kathy Zang
4:35 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012
This is a shame Bob, and I think it points to a group of teachers who are not, "thinking of the children" but only their own compensation. I realize that these are individual teachers, but add in the case of Harrison requesting wearing green in support of Red Ribbon week and I wonder. Do they wear purple, or orange on some of the other days supporting Red Ribbon?
Show Me The $$
12:14 am on Saturday, October 27, 2012
Since I have been living in Geneva, I have paid over $119K in teachers Salaries and pensions. I am in the process of calculating the average % increase. Can I have a school wing named after me, or at least a classroom? The corrupt union has to go.